Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whene
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 21 Nov 2018, 00:47
3
9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
5% (low)
Question Stats:
84% (01:13) correct 16% (01:45) wrong based on 1028 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whenever a policyholder makes a claim, a claims adjuster determines the amount that Vasquez-Morrell is obligated to pay. Vasquez-Morrell is cutting its staff of claims adjusters by 15 percent. To ensure that the company’s ability to handle claims promptly is affected as little as possible by the staff cuts, consultants recommend that Vasquez-Morrell lay off those adjusters who now take longest, on average, to complete work on claims assigned to them.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the consultants’ criterion for selecting the staff to be laid off?
(A) If the time that Vasquez-Morrell takes to settle claims increases significantly, it could lose business to other insurers.
(B) Supervisors at Vasquez-Morrell tend to assign the most complex claims to the most capable adjusters.
(C) At Vasquez-Morrell, no insurance payments are made until a claims adjuster has reached a final determination on the claim.
(D) There are no positions at Vasquez-Morrell to which staff currently employed as claims adjusters could be reassigned.
(E) The premiums that Vasquez-Morrell currently charges are no higher than those charged for similar coverage by competitors.
Re: Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whene
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2011, 05:15
The assurance company needs to layoff workers, but wants to continue to provide high level service. It hires consultants to determine whom to lay off. The consultants say lay off adjusters who take the longest to complete their work on claims.
B is the answer because one can imagine a situation where the most complex claims will take longer than really simple claims. If your complex claims are being handled by your best people and they take longer, then the consultants suggestion will result in you laying off your best people. That's not ideal at all.
C doesn't really call into question the consultants recommendation does it? I mean, look, it says that claims will not be paid until the adjuster makes final determination. That seems to support the idea that hey, this company really needs to get rid of people who take too long on claims right?
Another way to think about it is that you have a group of people working on claims. They all having varying speeds of completing their work. Now a bunch of them are going to be laid off. That means that the remaining workers will have to pick up the work of the laid off workers. In this situation knowing that your remaining workers are going to have to take the work of the laid off workers, would you rather lay off the slow people or the fast people? Well, you'd lay off the slow people right because if you gave the slow people even more work, they'd take even longer to complete the claims whereas if you gave the fast people the slow people's work, they'd be better able to get the claims done quickly.
Thus, C supports the consultants conclusion and is the incorrect answer.
Re: Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whene
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Dec 2014, 09:23
1
1
P1 : Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. P2 : Whenever a policyholder makes a claim, a claims adjuster determines the amount that Vasquez-Morrell is obligated to pay. P3 : Vasquez-Morrell is cutting its staff of claims adjusters by 15 percent. Goal : To ensure that the company’s ability to handle claims promptly is affected as little as possible by the staff cuts, Method to achieve the goal : consultants recommend that Vasquez-Morrell lay off those adjusters who now take longest, on average, to complete work on claims assigned to them.
Assumption: method to achieve the goal will not have other bad impact on the goal.
To find the 'statement which most seriously calls into question the consultants’ criterion for selecting the staff to be laid off', we need to hit out assumption. So, we need to show that if there is longer time taking staffs are laid off, it will impact the ability to handle claims promptly.
(A) If the time that Vasquez-Morrell takes to settle claims increases significantly, it could lose business to other insurers. >> It is strengthener
(B) Supervisors at Vasquez-Morrell tend to assign the most complex claims to the most capable adjusters. >> Yeah, if complex claims handlers (and hence longer time taker) are laid off, the time taken to handle those claims would increase further than would decrease. hence, it is a weakener.
(C) At Vasquez-Morrell, no insurance payments are made until a claims adjuster has reached a final determination on the claim. >> nonsensical
(D) There are no positions at Vasquez-Morrell to which staff currently employed as claims adjusters could be reassigned. >> there is scarcity of jobs there. laid off employee will not be given work. But how does that matters.
(E) The premiums that Vasquez-Morrell currently charges are no higher than those charged for similar coverage by competitors. >> nonsensical
Re: Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whene
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Mar 2017, 07:35
1
Top Contributor
So here's what we're being asked for:
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the consultants’ criterion for selecting the staff to be laid off?
And this is the consultants’ criterion for selecting the staff to be laid off:
Quote:
...consultants recommend that Vasquez-Morrell lay off those adjusters who now take longest, on average, to complete work on claims assigned to them.
And as kumarashok29 mentioned, here's the company's goal, in the exact words of the passage:
Quote:
To ensure that the company’s ability to handle claims promptly is affected as little as possible by the staff cuts...
Kumarashok29's answer is pretty thorough here -- but let's talk a little bit more about B.
Suppose that B is true, and "supervisors at Vasquez-Morrell tend to assign the most complex claims to the most capable adjusters." If so, then the company's best adjusters might also be among the slowest, since they're assigned the most complex claims. And "the most capable adjusters" are exactly the ones that you don't want to lay off. If the company lays off the best adjusters, it follows that their goal ("handle claims promptly") will be undermined.
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Re: Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers. Whene
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Nov 2018, 00:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
84% (01:13) correct 
