Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 06:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 14

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2011, 21:55
karlsyf wrote:
I think the answer is A, reasoning below.

Budget is equivalent to spending, i.e. output.

Argument is a lack of spending has caused economic slowdown under Governor Verdant.
argument, but they haven't.
E) concerns the cause of austere budgets, not their effect, not relevant.

Answer is A) real spending increase under Verdant is 6% - 3% = 3%, real spending increase under previous governer is 11.5% - 10% = 1.5%

Clearly Verdant spends more in real terms, and therefore is not more austere.

Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2011, 20:36
yup, in a simple thinking, A is correct. If we look back the critical reason, about the growth average, they didn't focus on the growth figures ( 6% and 11.5%) that include or exclude an basic inflation rate.
So, I also pending between A and B
Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2011, 22:36
Question Type: Weaken

Argument says:
Drop in annual budget means drop in city spending.

A. things were more expensive in the previous governor's term than are now. [Weaken]
B. Both Federal and State taxes have been lowered. IRRELEVANT. discussion revolves around drop annual budget and State spending.
C. each year budget was greater than the last year. IRRELEVANT. We are interested in average annual budget rather than each year budget.
D. Charges were introduced or discontinued for numerous services. IRRELEVANT. We are interested in annual budget as whole, we are not interested in cluster of services. May be those services were not expensive.
E.what old governor did to reduce spending is IRRELEVANT. We are interested in how current governor's annual budget relates with spending of the city.
_________________

WAHEGURU JEE DA KHALSA, WAHEGURU JEE DE FATEH

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 240
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 25

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2011, 12:32
kumarp256 wrote:
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.

thanks

i think the answer is d which looks more logical and clear
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2012
Posts: 204
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
GPA: 3.08
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 105

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2012, 15:11
I didn't know what austere meant. Confused me quite a bit. Oh well.
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 240
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 25

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2012, 03:35
IMO all options are wrong.
A argument does not talk about inflation. out of scope
B Argument does not talk about tax rate. out scope
C break up category : tells more about increase in budget (6% )
D Charging private citizen is out of scope
E although the term "austerity" was introduced during privious gov, The conclusion of argument states that austerity budget during current gov cause slow down. does not weakens the conclusion

IMO This is not GMAT like CR
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 175
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 83

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2014, 06:11
rajeshaaidu wrote:
karlsyf wrote:
I think the answer is A, reasoning below.

Budget is equivalent to spending, i.e. output.

Argument is a lack of spending has caused economic slowdown under Governor Verdant.
argument, but they haven't.
E) concerns the cause of austere budgets, not their effect, not relevant.

Answer is A) real spending increase under Verdant is 6% - 3% = 3%, real spending increase under previous governer is 11.5% - 10% = 1.5%

Clearly Verdant spends more in real terms, and therefore is not more austere.

please note that more percentage does not equal greater number!
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 78

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2014, 12:08
E should be the answer. Conclusion is - the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.
E provides an alternate cause that weakens the 'effect'.
A would rather be OOS. How does inflation affects the slow down ? What if there is no relationship between rate of inflation and slowdown ?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2016, 18:52
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 654
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Followers: 63

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 36

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2016, 01:47

Here's the explanation

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
Higher inflation means less purchasing power and a weak currency value. Meaning more dollars will be needed to buy anything. Lower inflation means the same thing can be bought in less dollars. Example when inflation is 10 % a car would cost you 1000 dollar but when inflation is 3 % the same car would cost you 400 \$. Now since inflation is reduced by 66% (3/10), the purchasing power of dollar has increased by 66%. so people can buy items by paying less money. So less money is buying more things. Now when you spend less obviously the market will receive less and hence the general situation will appear as a slowdown.
hence A is right.

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
It's opposite. It strengthen. Low income tax means more money in hands. So people should have spend more money.

(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
Mildly Strengthening. If each year the budget spending is increasing then it means it started increasing the first year of verdant being elected. if verdant become governor in 2010 , the spending was more than 2009. But in 2009 there must be another governor in the office. so verdant actually performed better than him in first year and keep on performing better with each passing year. So by no means the lack of budget spending can be attributed to Verdant who is actually better than the earlier governor.

(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
Strengthening. Two things are happening here. Earlier water was free, now its being charged. So people are spending. spending should increase
Earlier free health checkup was done. It is not done now; it's discontinued. So the cost of these free checkups should reflect in other ways in economies.

(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.
Again strengthening. If there is a slowdown , its because of the decision of earlier governor and not because of verdant.

thanks
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s   [#permalink] 11 Jun 2016, 01:47

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 28 Dec 2015, 05:12
5 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 8 10 Feb 2016, 04:35
3 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 7 16 May 2015, 09:27
5 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget 11 31 Oct 2016, 07:02
8 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 21 Sep 2016, 08:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by