May 05, 2018

Joined: Feb 09, 2018

Posts: 105

Kudos: 81

Self-reported Score:
720 Q50 V37

GMAT Club Tests

REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by gmat club tests [?]

Starting with plus points . Quant is very good . User interface is pretty similar to actual user interface. Post test Analytics should have included something similar to manhattan Cats where you get to analyse your mistakes more clear. Errors topic wse should be more clearly be shown . verbal section scoring was a bit tough compared to actual Quant . I scored 38 on actuyal GMAT and 18 on Gmat club tests . Quant was pretty similar to actual Gmat , bit tougher . Manhattan Quant is even tougher Explanations for quant questions are mostly given by experts , but verbal section laks explanations for few. Overall with slight modifications it is a good resource , especially fpr quant .

Login to create/modify/remove your own comments