It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 16:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

7 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 116 [7], given: 0

Location: san jose , CA
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2004, 00:51
7
This post received
KUDOS
93
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Edit: The discussion is locked. Go HERE for further discussion.


A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

Last edited by broall on 30 Aug 2017, 18:37, edited 3 times in total.
Too many pages for this topic. Do not try to unlock this post again!

Kudos [?]: 116 [7], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 589 [2], given: 22

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2009, 02:19
2
This post received
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Erukumk wrote:
+1 for D wats the OA

It is A, but i am with D too (At least until somebody clarify this...)


Probably, you must have referred it from 1000sc, only in 1000sc it is A, but the same problem is in OG 11 th edition. where OA is D, 1000sc has many questions with wrong OA.


Economist wrote:
Is the OA geniune:)
Because I cant understand how A can be the answer, there is absolutely no need of "had been allowed to dump"..as there is only one action in the past.


OA is D

IT IS A PROBLEM FORM OG 11 , PROBLEM NO.62 REFER IT.

Kudos [?]: 589 [2], given: 22

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1489

Kudos [?]: 1452 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2009, 02:58
crejoc wrote:
noboru wrote:
Erukumk wrote:
+1 for D wats the OA


It is A, but i am with D too (At least until somebody clarify this...)


Probably, you must have referred it from 1000sc, only in 1000sc it is A, but the same problem is in OG 11 th edition. where OA is D, 1000sc has many questions with wrong OA.


Economist wrote:
Is the OA geniune:)
Because I cant understand how A can be the answer, there is absolutely no need of "had been allowed to dump"..as there is only one action in the past.


OA is D

IT IS A PROBLEM FORM OG 11 , PROBLEM NO.62 REFER IT.


1000sc has many questions wrong??? that is very disappointing!!!
i was using it to improve my verbal skills...
Does anybody recommend other source to improve sentence correction skills?? (i have already done OG, and would like to going further).
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1452 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 589 [0], given: 22

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2009, 06:55
noboru wrote:
1000sc has many questions wrong??? that is very disappointing!!!
i was using it to improve my verbal skills...
Does anybody recommend other source to improve sentence correction skills?? (i have already done OG, and would like to going further).


Hi noboru, the questions are not wrong, they are worth practising, only the OA cant be reliable, so what you do, you search in gmatclub the particular question (almost all the 1000sc questions are already discussed here) to decide about the Correct Answer, by this way you will get to know the correct answer, as well as a lot of discussion why other answers are wrong, the last point is very important in SC preparation
Here is a link for some of 1000sc which has wrong OA, and the correct answers to them..
http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat/27211-i ... c-doc.html

Kudos [?]: 589 [0], given: 22

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 845 [0], given: 99

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2009, 07:59
crejoc wrote:


hey thanks crejoc for the above link.

Kudos [?]: 845 [0], given: 99

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 589 [1], given: 22

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2009, 09:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
ugimba wrote:
crejoc wrote:


hey thanks crejoc for the above link.


It is my pleasure to help you.. :-D

Kudos [?]: 589 [1], given: 22

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2009, 00:46
This one seems really screwed up. I just took my first GMAT Prep and scored a V45 with 100% accuracy in SC and can't figure out why A is not a perfectly good answer.

Logically, the 1972 agreement reduces the amount of phosphate dumping that was allowed prior to the agreement, hence the HAD BEEN ALLOWED. Prior to the agreement, munis were allowed to dump X (had been allowed to dump X) and after the agreement, they've since been allowed to dump Y.

The 1972 agreement didn't reduce the amount of phosphate dumping currently allowed (as OA choice A implies)... it reduced the amount of phosphate dumping allowed before the agreement. I can't see how "are allowed" can be rationalized.

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2009, 14:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi - I agree this question is nasty..

This link has some explanations. Try..

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/og-sc-62-t580.html

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 2

SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Premium Member
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 15:30
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities


OA
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings


Last edited by BM on 01 Nov 2009, 15:47, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2472

Kudos [?]: 843 [1], given: 19

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 15:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
bmillan01 wrote:
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities


OA
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


Tough between A and D, however:

"Amount of phosphates" is correct not "the phosphate amount".
"are allowed" not "had been allowed" is correct.

On that basis, D should be it.
_________________

Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

Kudos [?]: 843 [1], given: 19

SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Premium Member
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 15:52
This one just kicked my ass. The whole reduces/reduced and are/had been allowed issue confused me. I'm still having trouble wrapping my head around it.

Thanks for the help!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1468

Kudos [?]: 300 [1], given: 31

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 19:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
"Had been allowed" makes it seem that the agreement is no longer in effect and "are allowed" makes it seem that the agreement is still in effect.

That's the reason I chose D.

Not 100% sure if correct though.

Kudos [?]: 300 [1], given: 31

SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Premium Member
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 20:07
I think it makes sense now. Thanks everyone. Here's my crack at it.

A - "Had been allowed" is not correct. "Are allowed" (present tense) is needed.
B - "Phosphate amount" is not correct.
C - See B above.
D - Correct.
E - "Dumping by municipalities" is passive and can be more concise.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 684 [0], given: 432

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 18

Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2009, 10:00
Very interesting question, lets discuss

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United
States reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump into the
Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that
municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities
have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for
dumping by municipalities

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 18

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1468

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 31

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2009, 10:04
ezinis wrote:
Very interesting question, lets discuss

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United
States reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump into the
Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that
municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities
have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that
municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for
dumping by municipalities


answer D because the agreement is still ongoing....are allowed to dump rather than had been allowed to dump. Had been allowed to dump makes it seem as though the agreement no longer holds.

just an opinion not fact. like to get another opinion

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 31

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 18

Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2009, 10:34
The "allowed to dump" part is debatable to me. It should read "could have been allowed to dump.." because the agreement specifies the amount you can dump so you could not dump any more than a specified limit. The OA's reasoning is kinda circular to me...

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 18

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 228

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 25

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2009, 11:07
I agree with lagomez

D for me as well

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 25

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2009, 20:27
A – past perfect indicates that municipalities will never be allowed to dump again. Moreover, agreement cannot reduce something that had been (allow end that reduce?)
B and C – never use quantity/time period in forms of adjective
E – awkward structure (passive) – dumping by muni or allowed by muni.

D for me

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 2

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2009, 00:05
IMO D

they were still allowed - so, 'had been allowed' is preferably wrong
_________________

I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2009, 16:49
IMO D. This is an OG question. What is the OA?
_________________

A kudos would greatly help :)

Tuhin

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 23

Schools: Yale SOM
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2010, 21:35
IMO D. The agreement (in 1972, the past) reduced the amount the municipalities are allowed to dump from the time of the agreement onward. Therefore, it should be 'are allowed to dump'.

This is an OG question. OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 23

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce   [#permalink] 01 Jan 2010, 21:35

Go to page   Previous    1  ...  10   11   12   13   14   15   16  ...  22    Next  [ 437 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.