Hi everyone,
In these "valid for all X" cases, do we really have to unfold the entire equation? Like I had no trouble to determine bd=-1 just assume X=0
But then, is there a faster way to determine A and C ? Deadmaus's way seems too long and full of traps, like with the time pressure, fatugue etc, it begs for a miskate. Or I am wrong about it?
Is it possible to use the bd=-1 information to determine A and C? There is DS quesiton,
equating-coefficients-in-a-quadratic-equation-103919.html basically by assuming x=0 and then substituting and then assuming x=1 you simplify your life a lot, I know the questions are slightly different, but is it possible to apply the same principles here?
Also, I didn't see that the "a, b, and c are all smaller than d; a, c, and d are all larger than b" parte of the question stem being used to answer the question. we get b < a,c < d, I am I right?
Can we use this info plus the fact that bd=-1 to directly answer the question without the hairy unfolding and factoring of x^4 – 1 = (x^2 + ax + b)(x^2 + cx + d) ?
Thank you a lot for the time!