Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 05:49 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 05:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Status:Verbal Forum Moderator
Posts: 361
Own Kudos [?]: 2197 [1]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92952
Own Kudos [?]: 619366 [4]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 852
Own Kudos [?]: 861 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 680
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [0]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 200 [#permalink]
ICsharp wrote:
A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 2004, revenues from car sales were 20 % more than the revenues from truck sales. In 2005, if the revenues tram truck sales kept unchanged, were the revenues form car sales still greater than the revenue from truck sales?

(1) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down less than 20 % from 2004.
(2) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down more than 18 % from 2004.


Let's say revenue from truck sales in 2004= 100
Revenue from car sales in 2004 = 120

(1) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down less than 20 % from 2004.

If the revenues were 20% less. Then, the actual revenue would have been 120 - 120*20/100= 120-24

But since the revenues are down less then 20%, revenues can be 19% (<revenues by trucks) or 10% (>revenues by trucks)

Not sufficient.

(2) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down more than 18 % from 2004.
if it were 18%, then the revenues would have been 120- 120*18/100= 120- 22 (approximately)

But since revenues were down more than 18 %; revenues were always less than 100, and less than revenues from trucks. Sufficient.

B is the answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2013
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 142 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Re: A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 200 [#permalink]
ICsharp wrote:
A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 2004, revenues from car sales were 20 % more than the revenues from truck sales. In 2005, if the revenues tram truck sales kept unchanged, were the revenues form car sales still greater than the revenue from truck sales?

(1) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down less than 20 % from 2004.
(2) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down more than 18 % from 2004.
.

SOLUTION:

let t be the revenues from Trucks sales , and let c be the revenues from Cars sales .

In 2004, \(c=0.2*t--->t=0.83*c\).

In 2005, t is same as in 2004.

Statement 1). In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down less than 20 % from 2004.

In 2005, new revenues from car sales= \(c-(<0.2*c)\) = \(>0.8*c\).
so it may or may not be less than \(0.83*c.\)

Hence Insufficient.


Statement 2) In 2005, the revenues from car sales were down more than 18 % from 2004.

In 2005 , new revenues from care sales=\(c-(>0.18*c) = <0.82*c.\)

it is always less than \(0.83*c\).

Hence Sufficient.

Ans B
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 696 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 200 [#permalink]
2004 ---> C = 1.2 T
2005 ---> T is same and Is C still greater than T? Yes/No

1) C was down less than 20%.
Say C IS down by 20%

In 2004 ---> Suppose T = 100 then C will be 120.
In 2005 ---> C is down by 20% so C = 96 and less than 20% will make C>96.
We know T = 100 (remains unchanged)
So if C=97 and T=100....its NO (C is not greater than T)
if C=101 and T=100.....its YES (C is greater than T)
INSUFF

2) C is down more than 18%.
Again say C IS down by 20%.

From above w.k.t C=96 when its down by 20% (which is clearly more than 18%) and if continues to be more down then C<96.....Always NO
Hence SUFF

Option B :-D
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32713
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 200 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that in 200 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92952 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne