Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 07:48 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 07:48

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Modifiersx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Posts: 521
Own Kudos [?]: 486 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: United States
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
hannaro wrote:
I think it could be B, but also I realized that D is the best answer


Hello hannaro,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit of clarity, Option B is not merely inferior to Option D; it is outright incorrect.

In Option A "from a one-page writing sample" modifies "claims", incorrectly implying that the company makes a claim from the writing sample.

In Option D, "from a one-page writing sample" modifies "to asses", conveying the intended meaning - that the company claims that it is able to asses something from a one-page writing sample.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Posts: 131
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 409
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
KarishmaB and other experts,

What is wrong in Option E - "A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims _being able to assess, from a one-page writing sample,_ more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition." ? The meaning is that A firm claims something, and something is "being able to assess".

Moreover in Option D - A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims _to be able, from a one-page writing sample, to assess_ more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition. - isn't "from a one-page writing sample" modifying able instead of assess?

Thanks in advance!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
In option D isn't " from a one-page writing sample" important for the meaning of the sentence and hence shouldn't be placed between 2 commas?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Status:Do or Die
Posts: 180
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 125
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
sinew wrote:
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a one-page writing sample that it can assess more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition.


(A) from a one-page writing sample that it can assess

(B) from a one-page writing sample it has the ability of assessing

(C) the ability, from a one-page writing sample, of assessing

(D) to be able, from a one-page writing sample, to assess

(E) being able to assess, from a one-page writing sample,



My take on the question -
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a one-page writing sample that it can assess more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition.

Claims from one-page writing sample seems not the intended meaning. Hence, A is out.

Option B - Same issue as A .

Option C - "Assessing" this is not the correct usage. The correct would be " to access".

Option D - Correct

Option E - "Being". The usage of being is incorrect. Almost all GMAT options with "Being" usage is incorrect.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4349
Own Kudos [?]: 30801 [1]
Given Kudos: 637
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
waytowharton wrote:

What is wrong in Option E - "A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims _being able to assess, from a one-page writing sample,_ more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition." ? The meaning is that A firm claims something, and something is "being able to assess".

Moreover in Option D - A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims _to be able, from a one-page writing sample, to assess_ more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition. - isn't "from a one-page writing sample" modifying able instead of assess?

Thanks in advance!


Hey waytowharton

Happy to help you with this.


This is a straightforward case of Idiomatic Usage. Whenever the verb "claim" is followed directly by an action, that action must be in the to-verb form and not the verb-ing (gerundial) form. For example:

    a. She does not claim to be an expert. (Correct)
    b. She does not claim being an expert. (Incorrect)

    c. He claimed to hate all art. (Correct)
    d. He claimed hating all art. (Incorrect)

Now, the probable reason for this is that in sentences 'b' and 'd', the verb-ing words "being" and "hating" can even be interpreted as modifiers of the preceding verb (and not just as nouns objects). Owing to this duality, sentences 'b' and 'd' sound ambiguous in meaning.

I hope this helps.

Happy Learning.

Abhishek
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2021
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 82
Send PM
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
GMATNinja can you please help understand why option E is wrong. I read that "being" is not wrong if is used in continuous tense.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Vaishali2004 wrote:
GMATNinja can you please help understand why option E is wrong. I read that "being" is not wrong if is used in continuous tense.

For "being" to be a verb, it needs to be preceded by some form of "to be" (IS being, ARE being, WERE being, etc.). Since we don't have that here, "being" can't be a verb in (E).

You could argue that "being" is a noun (more specifically, a gerund if you like the jargon), representing the thing being claimed. It's a bit like saying "I claim this land in the name of Queen Victoria!" or "Tim claimed his luggage at the airport."

Notice that in those last two examples, the thing being claimed is a simple noun, and "to claim" essentially means "to take" (as in, "I take this land," or "Tim takes his luggage"). And that makes sense because "luggage" and "land" are concrete things that can be taken.

But "-ing" nouns (again, you can call them gerunds if you like grammar jargon) are typically actions or activities, not concrete things that can be claimed or taken. For example, you wouldn't claim skiing itself. Instead, you'd claim to be skiing.

And that's what we get in choice (D). The firm isn't claiming an action or activity itself. Instead, the firm is claiming to DO something (claiming to BE able...).

To be fair, that's a pretty subtle little point. Luckily, this question is very old, and you likely won't have to worry about this sort of distinction on your actual test. :)

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2020
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 7.9
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
sinew wrote:
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a one-page writing sample that it can assess more than three hundred personality traits, including enthusiasm, imagination, and ambition.


(A) from a one-page writing sample that it can assess

(B) from a one-page writing sample it has the ability of assessing

(C) the ability, from a one-page writing sample, of assessing

(D) to be able, from a one-page writing sample, to assess

(E) being able to assess, from a one-page writing sample,



The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2015

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 122
Page: 694




Good Housekeeping - Volume 191 - Page 236
https://books.google.com/books?id=aQQyAQAAIAAJ
1980

Using a writing sample of from one to three pages, these experts claim to be able to determine a person's social, mental, and emotional traits, as well as goal orientation and even attitudes toward parents and siblings.



GMATNinja

For me, the correct answer was between D and E, I picked E because it is clear that "from a one-page writing sample" is modifying "assess". In D, I feel, "from a one-page writing sample" may or may not be modifying "assess". Could you please help me understand why E is incorrect- I don't want to eliminate Option E just because it is constructed in passive voice?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [0]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
va789 wrote:
GMATNinja

For me, the correct answer was between D and E, I picked E because it is clear that "from a one-page writing sample" is modifying "assess". In D, I feel, "from a one-page writing sample" may or may not be modifying "assess". Could you please help me understand why E is incorrect- I don't want to eliminate Option E just because it is constructed in passive voice?

The point you made is definitely a small vote in favor of (D) over (E). I don't think it's a concrete reason to immediately eliminate (E), but it's a great difference to think about.

For more on choice (E), check out this post.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting claims from a [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne