A majority taken collectively may be regarded as a being whose opinion

Just for completeness, I also want to call your attention to one other problematic element of choice E: namely, its complete focus on the Framers of the Constitution—i.e., the Constitution's original writers, who did that work back at the very founding of the United States.

That was almost 250 years ago. The Constitution has changed quite a lot since then; there are now 25 additional amendments in force, above and beyond the original Articles. (26 Amendments have been ratified over time, but one was entirely repealed.)
Those numbers aren't the important part, though; what matters is really just the fact that the Constitution has evolved quite a lot since the late XVIII century. Since the core values/concerns expressed in the last two paragraphs are PRESENT issues, choice E is at very best only partially relevant right from the beginning—before we even consider any specifics! E is only relevant insofar as today's Constitution is still substantively the same as that of the Framers, or at least similar enough to ensure that concerns and values originally expressed in the late XVIIIc are still valid today, and in essentially the same ways with respect to the text.
That's a big ask after 250 years have gone by! So, there's no reason to be terribly confident that issues raised by the Framers are even still issues anymore—let alone to enough of an extent to validate choice E as relevant.