Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
After just 3 months of studying with the TTP GMAT Focus course, Conner scored an incredible 755 (Q89/V90/DI83) on the GMAT Focus. In this live interview, he shares how he achieved his outstanding 755 (100%) GMAT Focus score on test day.
In this conversation with Ankit Mehra, IESE MBA and CEO & Co-Founder, of GyanDhan, we will discuss how prospective MBA students can finance their MBA education with education loans and scholarships.
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 05:04
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(02:51)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts to be the best source for historical understanding. None of the historians regarded painting, architecture, music, dance, or culinary arts as the best source for historical understanding. So these historians neglect many important repositories of historical knowledge.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument takes for granted that
A) there are no potential sources for historical understanding other than written texts and the arts
B) painting, architecture, music, dance and culinary arts are important only as sources for historical understanding
C) there are no sources for historical understanding that are neither considered best by historians nor neglected by them
D) something other than written texts is the best sources for historical understanding.
E) the other sources for historical understanding mentioned by the historians surveyed are not important repositories of historical knowledge.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 05:11
I will go with E
Just beacuse the historians said that the best source for historical understanding is written texts, doesn't mean that the others are not important.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 05:28
rthothad wrote:
I will go with E Just beacuse the historians said that the best source for historical understanding is written texts, doesn't mean that the others are not important.
Rthothad, is that what E is really saying? I read it to mean the historians mentioned only texts as important repositories of historical knowledge (based on the stem). so if we infer that the historians mentioned more important repositories of historical knowledge, then E is telling us that those are important as well.
I think it's A in that addresses the fact the argument assumes text and the arts(painting, architecture, music, dance and culinary arts ) are the only source of historical understanding.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 05:40
Foola, The historians said that the best source for historical understanding is the written texts but the author used this to conclude that the historians neglect other sources, so I was looking for something that will bring out this discrepancy and felt that E was close.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 05:55
rthothad wrote:
Foola, The historians said that the best source for historical understanding is the written texts but the author used this to conclude that the historians neglect other sources, so I was looking for something that will bring out this discrepancy and felt that E was close.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 08:02
I think "C" is best.
In sum argument says that as the historians consider texts as the best means they neglect other repositories. "C" points out that assumption. If u negate "C" i.e. there ARE sources available that are neither considered best nor neglected by the historians, then the argument falls apart because then we can categorize these other repositories as these particular sources.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2005, 08:52
I picked C too.
Just because the scientists don't consider them as best, it doesn't mean that they ignore them.They might consider them as just plain good and hence definitely not neglected.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
09 Jul 2005, 02:10
HowManyToGo wrote:
I picked C too.
Just because the scientists don't consider them as best, it doesn't mean that they ignore them.They might consider them as just plain good and hence definitely not neglected.
HMTG.
I will go with E.
Question is asking for what is taken for granted in the passage. 'Considering written texts as best source' is what is taken as granted. Choice C is negation of this - and is NOT what is taken for granted.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
09 Jul 2005, 18:12
Although this question is not an assumption question, i tackled it by trying to weaken the assumption. The assumption is that painting, arch., music, dance or culinary arts are best sources for historical understanding. So, if we have an option that says that they are not (weakens the assumption), then it should be the answer. I actually figured out my ans. before looking at the options and viola, it was stated in (E).
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
10 Jul 2005, 08:11
The OA is C.
I think Ban does a fabulous job of explaining why AC C is the flaw in the argument. I narrowed down my AC to C and E. Notice when you negate AC E is makes the "conclusion" stronger. Well if it does then its not a flaw in the argument. Same analogy can be applied to assumption questions too.
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts
[#permalink]
11 Jul 2005, 05:31
gmat2me2 wrote:
In what conditions do we need to negate the choices in the CR questions generally?
I do not think there is a specific rule for this. It rather depends on individual approach. For tough assumption questions (e.g. when we have LEAST, EXCEPT, etc, in assumption questions), i tend to negate. Sometimes, when the options are close enough for comfort, i also negate. Some books (can't remember which now) will tell you that for weaken and strenghten questions, one should attempt to either weaken or strenghten the assumption, and in doing so, you may have to negate to find a valid assumption first (though this process may waste your time). So, IMO, it all depends on what works best for you.
Yes, the answer is (C). (E) actually tends to strenghten the position. Had the word 'NOT' been absent in (E), then (E) may have been a serious contender.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts [#permalink]