Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 05:02 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 05:02

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 100 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
GPA: 4
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V45
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7628 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
EducationAisle wrote:
parthjain68 wrote:

In my opinion, COMMA + WHICH is correctly placed here and refers back to "air traffic routes" AND NOT "the North Pole" because "the North Pole" is the object of preposition "over the North Pole" and therefore, is not the closest preceding main noun.

Please tell me whether I am right or wrong.

Hi , which can refer to object of preposition. There are numerous such official questions. For example:

The commission proposed that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be obtained through a local bond issue.

Here, which refers to park (park is the object of preposition of in this example).

However, in the sentence under consideration, which cannot modify North Pole because the sentence says which are. So, which can only modify a plural Noun in this sentence.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses modifier concepts of which, their application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.


I'm sorry, I am not sure about that. In my perception 'which' refers back to air traffic routes correctly. Whatever follows the preposition is part of the prepositional phrase, which modifies the previous noun. Now, 'which' refers back to the last noun, hence, the noun 'routes' ('air traffic' would be the compound adjective). Manhattan Prep has some good material on this.

Likewise in your example, 'of the park' is a prepositional phrase, as also is 'for development'. The reason your example is correct is that 'which' refers back to the noun 'funding' which could be 'open to the public early next year' as well.

At least this is how I see it.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
SebastianN wrote:
Likewise in your example, 'of the park' is a prepositional phrase, as also is 'for development'. The reason your example is correct is that 'which' refers back to the noun 'funding' which could be 'open to the public early next year' as well.

At least this is how I see it.

This interpretation is not correct.

This sentence is from The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2016.

Official explanation (from GMAT official guide): In this sentence, which clearly modifies park.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
EducationAisle wrote:
SebastianN wrote:
Likewise in your example, 'of the park' is a prepositional phrase, as also is 'for development'. The reason your example is correct is that 'which' refers back to the noun 'funding' which could be 'open to the public early next year' as well.

At least this is how I see it.

This interpretation is not correct.

This sentence is from The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2016.

Official explanation (from GMAT official guide): In this sentence, which clearly modifies park.
Ok, you are probably right. I don't understand the logic though. In my perception the GMAC applies the same rules always on every topic, regardkless of the question. The rule I know is that comma+'which' always refers back to the last noun before the comma.
Why does the explanation say that this option is correct compared to other answer choices? I don't have the material of 2016.

Posted from my mobile device
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
SebastianN wrote:
In my perception the GMAC applies the same rules always on every topic, regardkless of the question. The rule I know is that comma+'which' always refers back to the last noun before the comma.

I am not understanding your question. I thought that just a couple of post back, you mentioned that which will not refer to the last noun before the comma, if that noun is a part of prepositional phrase.
VP
VP
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Posts: 1392
Own Kudos [?]: 542 [0]
Given Kudos: 1656
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
I would be careful using the presence of “it” as the sole basis for elimination of answer A and other such sentence versions that use an expletive “it” as the Subject.

This kind of “it” may be acceptable when it is “pushing back” an Infinitive Phrase or a Substantive Noun Clause to later in the sentence.

In this sentence, the expletive “it” is indeed problematic but it may not always be the case.

Awkward Ex: “To study hard for the exam is crucial.”

—-Awkward, but not necessarily grammatically incorrect)

Better ex: “It is crucial to study hard for the exam.”

Awkward ex: “That he will get a high score on the exam is certain.”

—— awkward but not necessarily grammatically incorrect

Better ex: “It is certain that he will get a high score on the exam.”




MyGuruStefan wrote:
When dealing with fully underlined sentences such as this, try to identify a single error first to streamline the elimination process for maximum efficiency. In the sentence as written, the pronoun "it" is ambiguous because it lacks a clear antecedent. Eliminate A and look for any choices that also include ambiguous pronouns. Choices B and C also include the ambiguous or otherwise erroneous pronouns "it" and "which" that do not correctly and clearly refer to a prior subject. Eliminate B and C as well for their pronoun errors.

Choice D properly orders the information in the sentence and eliminates the ambiguous pronouns. Choice E eliminates the main predicate phrasing of the sentence by omitting "are" and leaves it without a clear subject-verb pairing. It also includes the incorrect idiom "found... as", which should be "found... to be". Eliminate choice E. The correct answer is D.


Posted from my mobile device
Tutor
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V45
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Fdambro294 wrote:
I would be careful using the presence of “it” as the sole basis for elimination of answer A and other such sentence versions that use an expletive “it” as the Subject.

This kind of “it” may be acceptable when it is “pushing back” an Infinitive Phrase or a Substantive Noun Clause to later in the sentence.

In this sentence, the expletive “it” is indeed problematic but it may not always be the case.

Awkward Ex: “To study hard for the exam is crucial.”

—-Awkward, but not necessarily grammatically incorrect)

Better ex: “It is crucial to study hard for the exam.”

Awkward ex: “That he will get a high score on the exam is certain.”

—— awkward but not necessarily grammatically incorrect

Better ex: “It is certain that he will get a high score on the exam.”


All good points, although in this sentence the "it" clearly isn't expletive as the word is used in the referential form. Hooray for the ambiguities of English, though. Keep up the good GMAT verbal practice! ~Stefan
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2020
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 270
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.

1.
1-1
S find O to be OC
I find the book interesting.
*
S+find+O (to be)
Russian study has found opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year to be both feasible and desirable. (E)
Russian study has found if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year to be both feasible and desirable.。


1-2
O is found by S to be OC/O is found to be OC by S
the book is found by me to be interesting.
the book is found to be interesting by me .
*
Opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is found by Russian study to be both feasible and desirable.
Opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is found to be both feasible and desirable by Russian study.


1-3
S find it to be OC O
I find it to be interesting the book
*
S+find+it (to be) OC O
Russian study has found it to be both feasible and desirable to open those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year. (C)
Russian study has found it to be both feasible and desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a yearIf

1-4
it is found by S to be OC O/it is found to be OC O by S/
it is found by me to be interesting the book /it is found to be interesting the book by me/
*
It is found by Russian study to be both feasible and desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.(A)

1-5
S find that S+V+C
*
Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.

2.
when/if/whether can both use as adj/noun clause


noun clause: used to introduce a clause, often in indirect speech, that shows two or more possibilities
adjective clause: used to say that a particular thing can or will happen only after something else happens or becomes true





A. Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
a-1
we can not use it for the whole thing(Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day)
a-2
and we can not use it for expletive because:
"if" in this sentence means adjective clause: used to say that a particular thing can or will happen only after something else happens or becomes true
it for expletive+ tov/noun clause.
a-3
both feasible as well as desirable


B. Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.
if-adv clause.

b-1
if S are..., it would be...
it(wrong) can not mean the whole sentence: air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year
would be(wrong)
if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it is/will both feasible and desirable.
b-2
Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study



C. A joint Canadian–Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.
c-1
S+V+O
c-2
both feasible as well as desirable

D. Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.(OA)

E. With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study as both feasible and desirable
opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study TO BE both feasible and desirable
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Posts: 582
Own Kudos [?]: 301 [0]
Given Kudos: 413
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
AbdurRakib wrote:
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.


A. Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.

B. Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.

C. A joint Canadian–Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.

D. Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.

E. With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study as both feasible and desirable


GMATNinja MartyTargetTestPrep KarishmaB AndrewN

"currently used by" - use of currently means that it should be present continuous tense as the action is continuing in present time - why used is correct here - this makes it present perfect
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14828
Own Kudos [?]: 64931 [0]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
Expert Reply
desertEagle wrote:
AbdurRakib wrote:
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.


A. Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.

B. Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.

C. A joint Canadian–Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.

D. Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.

E. With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study as both feasible and desirable


GMATNinja MartyTargetTestPrep KarishmaB AndrewN

"currently used by" - use of currently means that it should be present continuous tense as the action is continuing in present time - why used is correct here - this makes it present perfect


They have not switched the tense. It is a passive construction.

Only 2-3 planes use the routes over NP.
Routes over NP are used by only 2-3 planes.
Present tense is shown by the use of 'are.'

Active - A does B.
Passive - B is done by A.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2022
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.


A. Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian–Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
it-has no singular referent, both-as well as is incorrect

B. Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.
The starting modifier is modifying the study, which is incorrect

C. A joint Canadian–Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Both-as well as is incorrect, it-has no singular referent

D. Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian–Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.-Correct

E. With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study as both feasible and desirable
opening has been found by a joint Canadian—Russian study - incorrect structure & meaning
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne