Last visit was: 23 Jan 2025, 14:22 It is currently 23 Jan 2025, 14:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Weaken|            
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
4,110
 [145]
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,110
 [145]
20
Kudos
Add Kudos
125
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Snayt
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 20 May 2011
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
90
 [19]
Schools:IESE
 Q47  V35
Posts: 40
Kudos: 90
 [19]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 861
Own Kudos:
7,134
 [13]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 861
Kudos: 7,134
 [13]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
alpha_plus_gamma
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Jun 2010
Posts: 299
Own Kudos:
608
 [1]
Concentration: MC, PE, VC
 Q50  V37
Posts: 299
Kudos: 608
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C .

>A few months ago after El Chicn's large eruption in April 1982, air >temperatures throughout the region remained higher than >expected, given the long-term wather trends

weakens the generalized conclusion
>it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become >cooler than it would be otherwise
User avatar
vd
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 09 Sep 2010
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
279
 [3]
Posts: 135
Kudos: 279
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
An usually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the European republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984. Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

The cooling effect triggered by volcanic eruptions in 1985 was counteracted by an unusual warming of Pacific waters.

There is a strong statistical link between volcanic eruptions and the severity of the rainy seasons in India

A few months ago after El Chicn's large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained higher than expected, given the long-term wather trends.

The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Three months after an early springtime eruption in South America during the late 19th century, sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall.

tricky question

its between c and d but i ll chose D in this case because C sites a very specific example which took place before the event (1984) mentioned in the question stem

what is the OA for this one
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 08 Jan 2025
Posts: 2,404
Own Kudos:
10,382
 [1]
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,404
Kudos: 10,382
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between C and D. I choose D.

C still remains possibility of correct generalization if El Chicn's large eruption is an exception from many other eruptions.
D goes deeply, saying severe winter cannot be an evidence.
User avatar
ldpedroso
Joined: 01 May 2008
Last visit: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
58
 [9]
Location: São Paulo
Posts: 59
Kudos: 58
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The cooling effect triggered by volcanic eruptions in 1985 was counteracted by an unusual warming of Pacific waters.
The statement says nothing about Pacific waters. Eliminate it
There is a strong statistical link between volcanic eruptions and the severity of the rainy seasons in India
Nothing about rainy seasons. Eliminate it
A few months ago after El Chicn's large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained higher than expected, given the long-term wather trends.
Correct! It's a proof that volcanic eruptions have nothing to do with atmosphere climate, or at least no direct correlation with a lower temperature.
The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
In my opinion, it supports the statement, since it says that the eruption could indeed have a impact on the climate.
Three months after an early springtime eruption in South America during the late 19th century, sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall.
Nothing about sea temperatures
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 08 Jan 2025
Posts: 2,404
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,404
Kudos: 10,382
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sondenso, what is OE for D

Unfortunately, I don't have OG right now.
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 861
Own Kudos:
7,134
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 861
Kudos: 7,134
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
walker
Unfortunately, I have not OG now

Kidding! :lol:

Here you are!

D This statement supports the argument because it implies that volcanic eruptions cool the atmosphere, given that their effects mask the general warming trend.
User avatar
garimavyas
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Last visit: 01 Feb 2012
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 264
Kudos: 1,432
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C in 1:28 min . i think D does nothing but strengthen the argument
User avatar
patanahi
Joined: 07 Jan 2011
Last visit: 17 Mar 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 13
Kudos: 14
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C

Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.(means it will stay hot)

(C) A few months after El Chichn's large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained [highlight]higher than expected[/highlight], given the long-term weather trends (another reason the temp. was higher not because of eruption) weaken the argument.
User avatar
amit2k9
Joined: 08 May 2009
Last visit: 18 Jun 2017
Posts: 540
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Status:There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Posts: 540
Kudos: 605
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no reasoning gap in the argument hence a defender answer option requiring a third party element here.

C does the same,comparing with a situation which didn't follow the rhetoric mentioned in the argument.

Thus C.
User avatar
kumarashok29
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Last visit: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
109
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.83
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 109
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO - C

Conclusion: it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.
(this is very generalized statement, saying it is ALWAYS bound to be true that ALL the major eruption cause the atmosphere to become cooler)

Assumption: There is NO evidence that the major eruptions WOULD have caused the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.

Hit the assumption to get the weakener: There are SOME evidence that the major eruptions WOULD NOT have caused the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.

A) This is stating about unusual warming of Pacific waters, NOT about atmosphere. WRONG
B) So what? the severity of the rainy seasons in India does not mean atmosphere (generalized for all continents/countries). WRONG
C) Yeah, this is an example where the generalized conclusion is countered. CORRECT.
D) "temporarily mask the general warming trend" - This is strengthening than weakening. WRONG
E) "sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall." Firstly, this is strengthening and secondly, it is talking about SEA SURFACE, NOT generalized ATMOSPHERE as in the conclusion. WRONG
avatar
narmit
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Last visit: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 7
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I see this as a case of Cause-Effect
Volcano-->Haze-->Winter (Lower temperature). Hence, we need to show that
Any other Cause can cause same effect. This would weaken the Conclusion-->Option C gives this

As for Option--D "The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere"....

Warming trend will be masked..means that Warming will reduce-->Cooling of atmosphere-->Lowering the temperature..This will strenthen as the Cause is "Volcano" here

Regards
Naresh
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,010
Own Kudos:
2,891
 [8]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,010
Kudos: 2,891
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An unusually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the Europeans republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984.
Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) The cooling effect triggered by volcanic eruptions in 1985 was counteracted by an unusual warming of Pacific waters.
(This confirms that cooling effect is triggered by eruptions and does not weaken the claim.)

(B) There is a strong statistical link between volcanic eruptions and the severity of the rainy season in India.
(we are not seeking reason for rainy season but winter season and This does not explain how the link is between eruptions and season, it just says that it is strong but nothing else)

(C) A few months after EI Chichon’s large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained higher than expected, given the long-term weather trends.
(Instead of being cooler, the temperature remained higher even after eruption weakens the conclusion.)

(D) The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
(eruptions mask the warm trend means that eruptions cause cooling temporarily...........strengthener.)

(E) Three months after an early springtime eruption in South America during the late 19th century, sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall.
This defined the result at only coast and if not anything else strengthens the conclusion
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,010
Own Kudos:
2,891
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,010
Kudos: 2,891
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pinoygmat
what's wrong with D? Can't seem to eliminate this one

(D) The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
(eruptions mask the warm trend means that eruptions cause cooling temporarily
whether the reaction is temporary or permanent does not matter.
whether eruption causes cooling or not is the concerned aspect here.
This confirms that the eruption causes cooling and therefore
This is a..........strengthener.)
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,133
Kudos: 1,227
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
An usually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the European republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984. Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

The cooling effect triggered by volcanic eruptions in 1985 was counteracted by an unusual warming of Pacific waters.

There is a strong statistical link between volcanic eruptions and the severity of the rainy seasons in India

A few months ago after El Chicn's large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained higher than expected, given the long-term wather trends.

The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Three months after an early springtime eruption in South America during the late 19th century, sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall.

we need to demonstrate that volcanic eruptions - not always leads to cooling of the atmosphere.
A - irrelevant
B - irrelevant
C - ok, so after eruptions, the weather was higher than usual long term trend. so volcanic eruptions caused the increase of the temperature.
D - irrelevant
E - this one actually supports rather than weaken.
User avatar
HKD1710
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Last visit: 26 Feb 2021
Posts: 964
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 182
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
Posts: 964
Kudos: 4,219
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
An usually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the European republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984. Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Something happened after other thing happened. If we assume causality by saying that what happened before caused what happened after then we are using the flawed concept and prone to attacks by critiques.

(A) The cooling effect triggered by volcanic eruptions in 1985 was counteracted by an unusual warming of Pacific waters.
This tells what happened to the effect of a cause. -- OFS

(B) There is a strong statistical link between volcanic eruptions and the severity of the rainy season in India.
Is this necessary if eruption is linked to rain then it is linked to winters as well? - OFS

(C) A few months after El Chichn's large eruption in April 1982, air temperatures throughout the region remained higher than expected, given the long-term weather trends.
This is weakening by right methodology. It tells that the cause had a different effect. i.e. eruption had brought higher temperature. Conclusion said eruption makes atmosphere cooler. Weakened!

(D) The climatic effects of major volcanic eruptions can temporarily mask the general warming trend resulting from an excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
This is says eruption can temporarily make the atmosphere cooler. So supports a little bit but does not weaken at all.

(E) Three months after an early springtime eruption in South America during the late 19th century, sea surface temperatures near the coast began to fall.
Strengthens.
User avatar
Dpsdpdtk
Joined: 05 Jun 2017
Last visit: 16 Sep 2022
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
Products:
Posts: 56
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
An usually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the European republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984. Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.

Bunuel

Please change " usually " to "unusually"(as per GMAT prep 5)

Thanks,
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,904
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,889
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,904
Kudos: 696,125
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deepudalan
alimad
An usually severe winter occurred in Europe after the continent was blanketed by a blue haze resulting from the eruption of the Laki Volcano in the European republic of Iceland in the summer of 1984. Thus, it is evident that major eruptions cause the atmosphere to become cooler than it would be otherwise.

Bunuel

Please change " usually " to "unusually"(as per GMAT prep 5)

Thanks,
___________________
Done. Thank you.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7213 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts