Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 604
Location: PA

Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2010, 04:28
Question Stats:
59% (00:56) correct 41% (00:40) wrong based on 1147 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 12, 0.13, and 4.068 are three terminating decimals. If j and k are positive integers and the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, is j/k a terminating decimal? (1) k = 3 (2) j is an odd multiple of 3.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
If the Q jogged your mind do Kudos me : )




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49298

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2010, 04:37
THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Questions testing this concept: 700question94641.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalisrs2isaterminatingdecimal91360.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalplexplain89566.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalwhichofthefollowingfractions88937.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalBACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 12, 0.13, and 4.068 are three terminating decimals. If j and k are positive integers and the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, is j/k a terminating decimal?(1) \(k = 3\) > now, if \(j=3p\) (j is a multiple of 3) then \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3p}{3}=p=integer=terminating \ decimal\) but if \(j\) is not a multiple of 3 then reduced fraction \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{j}{3}\) won't be a terminating decimal, as denominator has primes other than 2 and/or 5. Not sufficient. (2) \(j\) is an odd multiple of 3 > \(j=3(2k+1)\), clearly insufficient as no info about the denominator \(k\). (1)+(2) \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3(2k+1)}{3}=2k+1=integer=terminating \ decimal\). Sufficient. Answer: C.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 219

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Oct 2010, 01:19
But it says the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, so how come j=3p ? I thought answer is A since J has to be a nonmultiple of 3 since if it is a multiple of 3, j/k cannot be expressed as a decimal. COrrect me if i am wrong!



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 772
Location: London

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Oct 2010, 01:36
psychomath wrote: But it says the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, so how come j=3p ? I thought answer is A since J has to be a nonmultiple of 3 since if it is a multiple of 3, j/k cannot be expressed as a decimal. COrrect me if i am wrong! Anser can't be A. Because just knowing that k=3, doesnt tell you much about the decimal. For instance if j and k do not have 3 as a common factor, it will not cancel out and you will not get a terminating decimal which you would if they do have 3 as a common factor. Eg. j=1, k=3 : Decimal is 0.333333.... j=6, k=3 : Decimal is 2.0
_________________
Math writeups 1) Algebra101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3D geometry
My GMAT story
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 375

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Oct 2010, 11:08
psychomath wrote: But it says the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, so how come j=3p ? I thought answer is A since J has to be a nonmultiple of 3 since if it is a multiple of 3, j/k cannot be expressed as a decimal. COrrect me if i am wrong! Can;t be true.. j can be a multiple of 3.
_________________
GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl)  Be Serious
Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...



SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1804
Concentration: Finance

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2013, 05:49
Bunuel wrote: THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Questions testing this concept: 700question94641.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalisrs2isaterminatingdecimal91360.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalplexplain89566.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalwhichofthefollowingfractions88937.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalBACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 12, 0.13, and 4.068 are three terminating decimals. If j and k are positive integers and the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, is j/k a terminating decimal?(1) \(k = 3\) > now, if \(j=3p\) (j is a multiple of 3) then \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3p}{3}=p=integer=terminating \ decimal\) but if \(j\) is not a multiple of 3 then reduced fraction \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{j}{3}\) won't be a terminating decimal, as denominator has primes other than 2 and/or 5. Not sufficient. (2) \(j\) is an odd multiple of 3 > \(j=3(2k+1)\), clearly insufficient as no info about the denominator \(k\). (1)+(2) \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3(2k+1)}{3}=2k+1=integer=terminating \ decimal\). Sufficient. Answer: C. So I guess for this type of questions we can never asume that k>j unless it says so in the question stem. Am I right? Cheers J



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49298

Re: Terminating Decimal
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2013, 08:39
jlgdr wrote: Bunuel wrote: THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Questions testing this concept: 700question94641.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalisrs2isaterminatingdecimal91360.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalplexplain89566.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalwhichofthefollowingfractions88937.html?hilit=terminating%20decimalBACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 12, 0.13, and 4.068 are three terminating decimals. If j and k are positive integers and the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, is j/k a terminating decimal?(1) \(k = 3\) > now, if \(j=3p\) (j is a multiple of 3) then \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3p}{3}=p=integer=terminating \ decimal\) but if \(j\) is not a multiple of 3 then reduced fraction \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{j}{3}\) won't be a terminating decimal, as denominator has primes other than 2 and/or 5. Not sufficient. (2) \(j\) is an odd multiple of 3 > \(j=3(2k+1)\), clearly insufficient as no info about the denominator \(k\). (1)+(2) \(\frac{j}{k}=\frac{3(2k+1)}{3}=2k+1=integer=terminating \ decimal\). Sufficient. Answer: C. So I guess for this type of questions we can never asume that k>j unless it says so in the question stem. Am I right? Cheers J Yes, nothing in the stem indicates that k must be greater than j.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Director
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 504
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29 GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35 GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28 GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Oct 2013, 13:36
This is a GMAT Hacks question of the day. The question reappeared on May 8, 2013. Here is the official explanation in case anyone was interested. Answer: C Statement (1) is insufficient. If the denominator of the fraction is 3, the decimal would be terminating if the numerator is a multiple of 3. For instance, 6/3 = 2, a terminating decimal. However, if the numerator is not a multiple of 3, it will not be terminating, as in 7/3 = 2.33.
Statement (2) is also insufficient. The important factor in determining whether a fraction is equivalent to a terminating decimal is the denominator. If j = 9, the fraction could be 9/3 (terminating) or 9/7 (not terminating).
Taken together, the statements are sufficient. j/k is equal to (3(integer))/3 = integer. An integer is, as defined in the question itself, a terminating decimal. Choice (C) is correct.



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 3516
Location: United States (CA)

Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2018, 17:55
rxs0005 wrote: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 12, 0.13, and 4.068 are three terminating decimals. If j and k are positive integers and the ratio j/k is expressed as a decimal, is j/k a terminating decimal?
(1) k = 3
(2) j is an odd multiple of 3. We need to determine whether j/k is a terminating decimal given that j and k are positive integers. One thing we should keep in mind is that a fraction (in lowest terms and with a denominator greater than 1) can be expressed as a terminating decimal if and only if the denominator comprises prime factors of only 2 and/or 5. For example, 3/10 and 3/15 = 1/5 are terminating decimals, whereas 3/7 and 3/9 = 1/3 are not. On the other hand, if the denominator is 1, the fraction is always a terminating decimal as long as the numerator is an integer. Statement One Alone: k = 3 Depending on the value of j, j/k may or may not be a terminating decimal. For example, if j = 1, then j/k = 1/3 is not a terminating decimal. On the other hand, if j = 3, then j/k = 3/3 = 1/1 = 1 is a terminating decimal. Statement one is not sufficient to answer the question. Statement Two Alone: j is an odd multiple of 3. Depending on the value of k, j/k may or may not be a terminating decimal. For example, if j = 3 and k = 7, then j/k = 3/7 is not a terminating decimal. On the other hand, if j = 3, and k = 3, then j/k = 3/3 = 1/1 = 1 is a terminating decimal. Statement two is not sufficient to answer the question. Statements One and Two Together: Since j is an odd multiple of 3, and k = 3, j/k is always an odd integer. Thus, j/k is a terminating decimal. Answer: C
_________________
Scott WoodburyStewart
Founder and CEO
GMAT Quant SelfStudy Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions




Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits &nbs
[#permalink]
16 Jan 2018, 17:55






