Last visit was: 09 May 2024, 03:34 It is currently 09 May 2024, 03:34

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2022
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 783 [9]
Given Kudos: 69
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 May 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [2]
Given Kudos: 390
Location: India
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail)
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14006
Own Kudos [?]: 33448 [1]
Given Kudos: 5787
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 650
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Atmospheric carbon dioxide (C02) has been increasing since 1700 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Q1 - The passage is primarily concerned

Let's see the passage structure first
    1. The passage introduces a puzzling or strange phenomenon. What phenomenon? With the increasing use of fossil fuels, the amount of CO2 should have increased and not the other way around. So where is this excess CO2 going?
    2. That's where the author introduces Allen Auclair's claim.
    3. In the 2nd passage, the author introduces the minimum condition "must be compared with the wood lost" for the claim or theory to be true and then provides the supporting evidence.
    4. Finally, the author concludes that "turning the northern forests from a carbon source into a carbon sink and storing CO2 from fossil fuel over the next fifty years." In a way supporting "Allen Auclair's claim."

A. refuting a claim about the causes of a phenomenon - opposite. The author is supporting a claim and not refuting it.

B. presenting an analysis of a common natural process - it's not "common." Opposite.

C. providing an explanation for a puzzling phenomenon - Yes. The puzzling phenomenon is "With the increasing use of fossil fuels, the amount of CO2 should have increased and not the other way around," and what is the explanation? "Allen Auclair's claim or theory."

D. evaluating the methodology used in a recent study - "evaluate" means discussing the strengths and weaknesses and then coming to a conclusion. There is no critique here. Above all the passage doesn't talk about any "methodology." The passage only shares an explanation of the puzzling phenomena and doesn't talk about the methods he measured, whether these methods were good or bad, or whether some other methods could be better.

E. contrasting two explanations of an unexpected phenomenon - there is only one explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2023
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Atmospheric carbon dioxide (C02) has been increasing since 1700 [#permalink]
Hi GMATNinja karisma Veritas

Could you please explain question 2?

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Atmospheric carbon dioxide (C02) has been increasing since 1700 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6922 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14006 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne