Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Oct 0309:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Are you ready to take the next step in your academic and professional journey? If you’re aspiring to join one of the top 15 MBA programs, we’ve got an exciting opportunity just for you! Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event
Oct 0301:30 PM IST
-11:30 PM IST
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.
Oct 1010:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.
Oct 1110:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Think a 100% GMAT Verbal score is out of your reach? Target Test Prep will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.- Oct 12
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Between 1980 and 2000 the sea otter population of the Aleutian Islands
[#permalink]
01 Nov 2022, 11:27
01 Nov 2022, 11:27
KarishmaB
WillGetIt
Between 1980 and 2000 the sea otter population of the Aleutian Islands declined precipitously. There were no signs of disease or malnutrition, so there was probably an increase in the number of otters being eaten by predators. Orcas will eat otters when seals, their normal prey, are unavailable, and the Aleutian Islands seal population declined dramatically in the 1980s. Therefore, orcas were most likely the immediate cause of the otter population decline.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument‘?
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
Please hit kudos if you like this post.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument‘?
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
Please hit kudos if you like this post.
Responding to a pm:
Again, Official Answers are not debatable and really, I haven't seen an exception, at least in the verbal section.
Try to understand the logic of (C).
They have very smartly used the word: "surviving".
Let's take the argument first.
Premises:
Sea otter population declined - but no sign of disease and malnutrition so predators might have been responsible.
Seal population declined dramatically.
Orcas eat otters when seals are not available.
Conclusion:
Orcas must have led to otter population decline.
We need to strengthen that orcas are responsible for the huge decline in otter population.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
Had the option said, "Most sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas," then the option would have weakened our argument.
But the option says, "Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas." This means that the otters that are left are the ones where orcas cannot reach. Wherever orcas can reach, otters have disappeared from there. It means that it is highly probable that orcas have been binging on otters wherever possible.
Imagine a meadow which was full of grass 2 months back. A small part of the meadow is fenced. Some cattle was introduced in the meadow two months back. What happens if after to months you see that most of the grass is gone except the small part which was fenced? The likely reason is that the cattle ate the grass and hence reduced it.
This is the same concept.
None of the other options are relevant.
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
Irrelevant
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
What seals eat is none of concern. What we need to strengthen is that orcas ate up the otters.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
This doesn't strengthen that orcas ate the otters. Perhaps some orcas couldn't adapt to decrease in seal population. We don't know.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
This might affect seal population. It doesn't strengthen that orcas ate otters.
Answer (C)
Dear KarishmaB
As per answer choice E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
If we have a decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food
=>That leads to a decline to the population of seals
=> That leads to Orcas eat otters since seals are not available !
can you help explaining why this cannot be logical and thus E is incorrect
Tank you so much
Re: Between 1980 and 2000 the sea otter population of the Aleutian Islands
[#permalink]
02 Nov 2022, 00:07
02 Nov 2022, 00:07
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Fido10
KarishmaB
WillGetIt
Between 1980 and 2000 the sea otter population of the Aleutian Islands declined precipitously. There were no signs of disease or malnutrition, so there was probably an increase in the number of otters being eaten by predators. Orcas will eat otters when seals, their normal prey, are unavailable, and the Aleutian Islands seal population declined dramatically in the 1980s. Therefore, orcas were most likely the immediate cause of the otter population decline.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument‘?
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
Please hit kudos if you like this post.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument‘?
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
Please hit kudos if you like this post.
Responding to a pm:
Again, Official Answers are not debatable and really, I haven't seen an exception, at least in the verbal section.
Try to understand the logic of (C).
They have very smartly used the word: "surviving".
Let's take the argument first.
Premises:
Sea otter population declined - but no sign of disease and malnutrition so predators might have been responsible.
Seal population declined dramatically.
Orcas eat otters when seals are not available.
Conclusion:
Orcas must have led to otter population decline.
We need to strengthen that orcas are responsible for the huge decline in otter population.
C. Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
Had the option said, "Most sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas," then the option would have weakened our argument.
But the option says, "Most of the surviving sea otters live in a bay that is inaccessible to orcas." This means that the otters that are left are the ones where orcas cannot reach. Wherever orcas can reach, otters have disappeared from there. It means that it is highly probable that orcas have been binging on otters wherever possible.
Imagine a meadow which was full of grass 2 months back. A small part of the meadow is fenced. Some cattle was introduced in the meadow two months back. What happens if after to months you see that most of the grass is gone except the small part which was fenced? The likely reason is that the cattle ate the grass and hence reduced it.
This is the same concept.
None of the other options are relevant.
A The population of sea urchins, the main food of sea otters, has increased since the sea otter population declined.
Irrelevant
B. Seals do not eat sea otters, nor do they compete with sea otters for food.
What seals eat is none of concern. What we need to strengthen is that orcas ate up the otters.
D. The population of orcas in the Aleutian Islands has declined since the 1980s.
This doesn't strengthen that orcas ate the otters. Perhaps some orcas couldn't adapt to decrease in seal population. We don't know.
E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
This might affect seal population. It doesn't strengthen that orcas ate otters.
Answer (C)
Dear KarishmaB
As per answer choice E An increase in commercial fishing near the Aleutian Islands in the 1980s caused a slight decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food.
If we have a decline in the population of the fish that seals use for food
=>That leads to a decline to the population of seals
=> That leads to Orcas eat otters since seals are not available !
can you help explaining why this cannot be logical and thus E is incorrect
Tank you so much
Option (E) could lead to a decrease in seal population because their food decreased. But the fact that seal population decreased is something we already know.
We are given:
and the Aleutian Islands seal population declined dramatically in the 1980s.
Does it matter what the reason for the decline of the seal pop is? We already know that seal pop declined dramatically. We are basing our argument on that - that seal pop declined so orcas ate otters. Any premise that tells us why the seal pop could have declined has no impact on the given argument.
We need to give FURTHER proof that orcas could be eating otters.
If the argument had not mentioned that seal pop has declined then option (E) could have helped.
Re: Between 1980 and 2000 the sea otter population of the Aleutian Islands
[#permalink]
28 Apr 2023, 05:11
28 Apr 2023, 05:11
In my opinion, Options(C). Most of the surviving sea otters live in the bay that is inaccessible to orcas.
What about another sea otter other than surviving sea otter, it must have been eaten by orcas. that is the reason orcas were most likely the immediate cause of the otter population decline.
What about another sea otter other than surviving sea otter, it must have been eaten by orcas. that is the reason orcas were most likely the immediate cause of the otter population decline.
