Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 111
GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 22:47
Question Stats:
62% (02:18) correct 38% (02:57) wrong based on 516 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, for each value from 1 to 6, there are two cards in the deck with that value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value? A. 8/33 A. 62/165 C. 17/33 D. 103/165 E. 25/33
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
If you like my post, consider giving KUDOS




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47918

Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2010, 00:24
maheshsrini wrote: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, for each value from 1 to 6, there are two cards in the deck with that value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value? 8/33 62/165 17/33 103/165 25/33 Let's calculate the opposite probability ans subtract this value from 1. Opposite probability would be that there will be no pair in 4 cards, meaning that all 4 cards will be different: \(\frac{C^4_6*2^4}{C^4_{12}}=\frac{16}{33}\). \(C^4_6\)  # of ways to choose 4 different cards out of 6 different values; \(2^4\)  as each of 4 cards chosen can be of 2 different suits; \(C^4_{12}\)  total # of ways to choose 4 cards out of 12. So \(P=1\frac{16}{33}=\frac{17}{33}\). Or another way:We can choose any card for the first one  \(\frac{12}{12}\); Next card can be any card but 1 of the value we'v already chosen  \(\frac{10}{11}\) (if we've picked 3, then there are one more 3 left and we can choose any but this one card out of 11 cards left); Next card can be any card but 2 of the values we'v already chosen  \(\frac{8}{10}\) (if we've picked 3 and 5, then there are one 3 and one 5 left and we can choose any but these 2 cards out of 10 cards left); Last card can be any card but 3 of the value we'v already chosen  \(\frac{6}{9}\); \(P=\frac{12}{12}*\frac{10}{11}*\frac{8}{10}*\frac{6}{9}=\frac{16}{33}\). So \(P=1\frac{16}{33}=\frac{17}{33}\)  the same answer as above. Answer: C. Hope it helps.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Location: India

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2010, 00:52
Bunuel, very nice explanation. I believe, the second method can be derived logically and the first one with some knowledge of equations in permutations and combination. Thanks once again.
_________________
 Please give kudos, if my post is helpful.
For English Grammar tips, consider visiting http://www.grammarquizzes.com/index.html.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 774
Location: London

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2010, 06:30
gmatrant wrote: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, for each value from 1 to 6, there are two cards in the deck with that value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
a.8/33 b.62/165 c.17/33 d.103/165 e.25/33
My approach
We need to calculate 1p(x) where x is the probability of not drawing identical numbered cards. 1.From 12 cards we can pick any one number as the first card  No of ways =12 2.We now have 10 ways of picking the next card that does not have identical number = 10 ways 3. Picking up the 3rd card in 8 ways since 2 cards are already chosen and we cannot choose the same numbered card. 4. Similarly as in 3 we can now have 6 ways to choose the fourth card
Total ways of not picking even one identical number pair card = 12*10*8*6 Total ways of picking up 4 cards out of 12 = 12 * 11 * 10 *9 Probability of x is (12*10*8*6) / (12*11*10*9) = 16/33 Hence p(1x) = 17/33.
I have a question here The total way of picking up 4 cards our of 12 is 12C4 and it will give me a different number than I calculated above. Can you please tell me where I am going wrong here, though I get the answer. In method 1, the order of picking matters In method 2, when you use the C(n,r) formulae, the order of picking does not matter As a result method 2 will always yield a lower number of ways than method 1 Eg. In method 1, you will count the set Suit1No1, Suit1No2,Suit2No3,Suit2No4, 4! times, one for each ordering between the 4 cards that exists, whereas in method 2, you will count it only once. It is essentially the difference between P(n,r) and C(n,r) This subtlety is present in a lot of probability questions and must be clarified in the Q. The above question is in MGMAT (I got it on my CAT), but it fails to tell you if the 4 cards that are picked are picked simultaneously (i.e. order does not matter) or one by one. In my opinion such questions are ambiguous and the answer is dependent on the assumption you make. Unfortunately there are more Qs like this one on the MGMAT CATs, just something to be weary of.
_________________
Math writeups 1) Algebra101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3D geometry
My GMAT story
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1345

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2010, 07:05
shrouded1 wrote: This subtlety is present in a lot of probability questions and must be clarified in the Q. The above question is in MGMAT (I got it on my CAT), but it fails to tell you if the 4 cards that are picked are picked simultaneously (i.e. order does not matter) or one by one. In my opinion such questions are ambiguous and the answer is dependent on the assumption you make. Unfortunately there are more Qs like this one on the MGMAT CATs, just something to be weary of. Whether you pick the four cards simultaneously, or pick them one at a time (without replacement) doesn't actually matter if you are finding a probability; the two situations are mathematically identical. You can see this intuitively by thinking of taking hold of four cards in the deck first. If you take them all out at the same time, or if there is a nanosecond between your removing each, why would the probability that you get a pair be affected? It won't be, so the 'ambiguity' you suggest is present in such questions is no ambiguity at all. You can see that either perspective will give you the same answer, though it's easier to illustrate with a simpler example. Say you have 3 red marbles and 4 blue marbles in a bag, and you pick two (either simultaneously, or without replacement  it's the same thing), and you want to find the probability of picking two red marbles. If we look at the problem as though we are picking marbles one at a time, we have 3*2 ways of picking two reds, and 7*6 ways of picking two marbles, so the probability would be 3*2/7*6 = 1/7. If we look at the problem as though we're picking two marbles simultaneously, we have 3C2 ways of picking two red marbles and 7C2 ways of picking two marbles, so the probability would be 3C2/7C2 = 1/7. So when you stick your two hands in the bag and grab two marbles, it doesn't matter if you lift your two hands out at the same time, or take them out one at a time; the probability is the same. Note though that you need to be consistent in the calculation  if you assume order matters when you calculate the numerator, you must also assume order matters when you calculate the denominator.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 774
Location: London

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2010, 07:19
You are right, what I should have said is that the ambiguity occurs if you are solving the combinatorial problem, where you are counting outcomes. In calculating probability it is irrelevant as the ordering terms will cancel themselves out. In the question mentioned, the problem is if you calculate the number of relevant ways using one assumption and the total number of ways using another assumption
_________________
Math writeups 1) Algebra101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3D geometry
My GMAT story
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 774
Location: London

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Sep 2010, 23:08
mainhoon wrote: Bunuel  I understand the 6c4 x 2^4 approach.. but why is this wrong: 6c2  2 cards from 1st suite 4c2  2 cards from the 4 remaining (the other 2 have the same #s as the ones selected from 1st suite).. so 6c2 x 4c2? There is 2 major problems with this : (a) By choosing 2 cards from one suit and 2 from the other, you are forcing that the choice has exactly 2 cards from each suit, which is not true (b) Even if you had to calculate no of ways to pick 4 cards such that no pairs and 2 cards from each suite, this is wrong, because it needs to be multiplied by 2 [2 ways to choose which is the "first suite"]
_________________
Math writeups 1) Algebra101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3D geometry
My GMAT story
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 774
Location: London

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Sep 2010, 23:56
mainhoon wrote: yes can see it now.. is there any other method to get the answer other than 6c4 2^4? Using combinatorics, you can make up any number of ways to solve a problem. The essence here is counting a certain subset of scenarios, how you choose to count that is entirely up to you. As done above you can use a "Universe  Everything Else" or you can count directly in a number of ways like "Ways to pick exactly 1 pair + Ways to pick exactly 2 pairs", "Ways to pick pairs <= 3 + ways to pick pairs with number b/w 4 &6" The point being how to count, can be answered in an arbitrary number of ways, but the end result is the same : ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME .. you just need to pick the shortest and easiest one. In scenarios like this one "universeeverything" gives the most elegant and straight forward solution
_________________
Math writeups 1) Algebra101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3D geometry
My GMAT story
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 41
Schools: McCombs, ISB, Insead, LBS
WE 1: 1.5
WE 2: 5.5

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2011, 20:41
Guys, I got this question in one of the MGMAT practice tests. The solution provided used 1x technique. For probability questions, I want to practice at least 2 ways of solving the problem. And I believe, this problem can be solved by Combinatorics (12C4 = 495 for the denominator and anagram for the numerator). I just cant get the numerator right. Can anyone please tell me how to solve this question using Combinatorics?  Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, for each value from 1 to 6, there are two cards in the deck with that value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value? 8/33 62/165 17/33 103/165 25/33
_________________
You can see from the number of "Kudos Given" on my profile that I am generous while giving Kudos. Is it too much to ask for a similar favor???



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1345

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2011, 21:18
I don't like the direct approach here, but I did post a solution using it in this thread (scroll down a bit) : http://www.beatthegmat.com/combination ... t8924.htmlIt's a lot more work to do the problem directly than it is to find the probability of no pairs and subtract from 1, however.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 41
Schools: McCombs, ISB, Insead, LBS
WE 1: 1.5
WE 2: 5.5

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2011, 21:32
Thanks Ian. I agree its not the best way solve this particular problem. But just trying get my head around both the techniques of solving these questions. Who knows, I might run into a problem slightly different for which the 2nd technique is more appropriate Thanks a lot for the response.
_________________
You can see from the number of "Kudos Given" on my profile that I am generous while giving Kudos. Is it too much to ask for a similar favor???



VP
Status: Top MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1459

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2011, 11:04
This calculation is not really too lengthy. Although this is a difficult question, it is fair game for the GMAT at higher score levels. Required probability = 1 prob(no pair of cards have the same value) = 1  [(12x10x8x6/12x11x10x9)] = 1  48/99 = 17/33 Option (C)
_________________
GyanOne  Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog
Top MBA Admissions Consulting  Top MiM Admissions Consulting
Premium MBA Essay ReviewBest MBA Interview PreparationExclusive GMAT coaching
Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation  Call us now +91 98998 31738



Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 230

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2012, 15:06
required probability = 1  p(no pair) p(no pair) = \(\frac{12}{12}*\frac{10}{11}*\frac{8}{10}*\frac{6}{9} = \frac{16}{33}\) required prob = \(1  \frac{16}{33} = \frac{17}{33}\)
_________________
press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)



Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 15

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 May 2012, 06:39
total no of ways of choosing any 4 cards out of 12 = 12 C 4 =45*11
the no favourable outcomes, i.e atleast 1 pair , = no of pairs i.e 6 *{ ( no of ways of choosing the remaining 2 cards, i.e. 10 C 2  the no of repetitions (i.e.5)} + the no ways of getting 2 pairs .i.e. 15
= 6( 10 C2 5)+15 = 6(40)+15 = 3*85
therefor probability = (3*85 )/ (45*11) = 17/33



Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 362
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 May 2012, 09:51
Bill has a small what? sorry for that joke ))) Actually, this question was discussed trillions times. that is why I cant do anything, but smile ) http://gmatclub.com/forum/billhasasmalldeckof12playingcardsmadeupofonly2suitsof6cardseach96078.htmlP.S. my advise use google search and ur life will be brighter
_________________
Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true
I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth



Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2011
Posts: 102

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 May 2012, 12:57
Quote: Bill has a small what? sorry for that joke ))) Actually, this question was discussed trillions times. that is why I cant do anything, but smile ) billhasasmalldeckof12playingcardsmadeupofonly2suitsof6cardseach96078.htmlP.S. my advise use google search and ur life will be brighter https://www.google.ru/#hl=ru&newwindow= ... 54&bih=579actually i don't care what has Bill and what size it is  but it took me more than two min to find it out compared to trillion +1 doesnt make any difference ) but ,anyway, thank you for an advice  a quite good one!



Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 525

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 17 Sep 2012, 22:28
The way that is given here I understand. pairstwinsandcouples103472.html#p805725But I am trying to do in another way , wonder what I am doing wrong. at least one pair means either one pair or two pairs so lets suppose we have A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 AND B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 I understand the 1  p( opposite event ) but just for understanding sake , if I tried the direct way , how could it be done. P( One pair) + p( two pairs ) one pair 6C1*5C2(4!/2!)= 720 6C1 = ways to select the one card from 6 which will form the pair 5C2 = select two different cards from the 5 remaining to form the singles * This I think this is not correct , what would be correct * 4!/2! = permutations of 4 letters where two are identical for two pairs 6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 90 6C2 = ways to select the two cards which will form the pair . 4!/2!2! = ways to arrange the 4 letters where 2 are same kind and another 2 are same kind . hence total ways for at least one pair > 6C1*5C2(4!/2!) + 6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 810 ( what is wrong here) however this will not the required answer, can anybody please correct my logic and show me how to approach this direct way ? total ways 4 cards can be selected 12C4 = 495 hence I am getting a probability more than one which is not possible Would highly appreciate any help.
_________________
 Stne
Originally posted by stne on 17 Sep 2012, 05:28.
Last edited by stne on 17 Sep 2012, 22:28, edited 2 times in total.



Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 604
WE: Science (Education)

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2012, 10:32
stne wrote: The way that is given here I understand. pairstwinsandcouples103472.html#p805725But I am trying to do in another way , wonder what I am doing wrong. at least one pair means either one pair or two pairs so lets suppose we have A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 AND B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 I understand the 1  p( opposite event ) but just for understanding sake , if I tried the direct way , how could it be done. P( One pair) + p( two pairs ) one pair 6C1*10C2(4!/2!)= 720 6C1 = ways to select the one card from 6 which will form the pair 5C2 = select two different cards from the 5 remaining to form the singles * This I think this is not correct , what would be correct * 4!/2! = permutations of 4 letters where two are identical for two pairs 6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 90 6C2 = ways to select the two cards which will form the pair . 4!/2!2! = ways to arrange the 4 letters where 2 are same kind and another 2 are same kind . hence total ways for at least one pair > 6C1*10C2(4!/2!) + 6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 810 ( what is wrong here) however this will not the required answer, can anybody please correct my logic and show me how to approach this direct way ? total ways 4 cards can be selected 12C4 = 495 hence I am getting a probability more than one which is not possible Would highly appreciate any help. One pair  should be 6C1*5C2*2*2 = 6*10*4 = 240. Choose one pair out of 6, then two single cards from two different pairs. You have two suits, so for the same number two possibilities. Two pairs  just 6C2=15. Total  255 Probability 255/495 = 17/33. 10C2 also includes remaining pairs of cards with the same number, so choosing 2 out of 10 does not guarantee two nonidentical numbers. Another problem is that 495 represents the number of choices for 4 cards, regardless to the order in which they were drawn. Then you should consider the other choices accordingly, and disregard the order in which they were chosen.
_________________
PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.



Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 525

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2012, 22:33
Just edited my original post Meant to take 5C2 not 10C2, so my doubt one pair 6C1*5C2(4!/2!)= 720 6C1 = ways to select the one card from 6 which will form the pair 5C2 = select two different cards from the 5 remaining to form the singles * This I think this is not correct , what would be correct * 4!/2! = permutations of 4 letters where two are identical for two pairs 6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 90 6C2 = ways to select the two cards which will form the pair . 4!/2!2! = ways to arrange the 4 letters where 2 are same kind and another 2 are same kind .
_________________
 Stne



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8184
Location: Pune, India

Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2012, 23:25
stne wrote: Just edited my original post Meant to take 5C2 not 10C2,
so my doubt
one pair
6C1*5C2(4!/2!)= 720
6C1 = ways to select the one card from 6 which will form the pair 5C2 = select two different cards from the 5 remaining to form the singles * This I think this is not correct , what would be correct * 4!/2! = permutations of 4 letters where two are identical
for two pairs
6C2 * 4!/2!2! = 90
6C2 = ways to select the two cards which will form the pair . 4!/2!2! = ways to arrange the 4 letters where 2 are same kind and another 2 are same kind . Responding to a pm: There is a difference between this question and the other one you mentioned. In that question, you were using one digit twice which made them identical. Here the two cards that form the pair are not identical. They are of different suits. Also, here, you don't need to arrange them. You can assume to just take a selection while calculating the cases in the numerator and the denominator. The probability will not get affected. In the other question, you needed to find the number of arrangements to make the passwords/numbers and hence you needed to arrange the digits. Hence, in this step, 6C1*5C2(4!/2!), it should be 6C1*5C2*2*2 instead. 6C1 = ways to select the one card from 6 which will form the pair 5C2 = select two different values from the 5 remaining to form the singles *This is correct * 2*2 = For each of the two values, you can select a card in 2 ways (since you have 2 suits) Similarly, 6C2 * 4!/2!2! should be 6C2 only to select 2 pairs out of 6. Probability = 255/495 = 17/33 Note: You can arrange the cards too and will still get the same probability. Just ensure that you arrange in numerator as well as denominator. Only one pair = 6C1*5C2*2*2 * 4! (you multiply by 4! because all the cards are distinct) Both pairs = 6C2 * 4! (you multiply by 4! because all the cards are distinct) Select 4 cards out of 12 = 12C4 * 4! (you multiply by 4! because all the cards are distinct) Probability = 255*4!/495*4! = 17/33
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Save up to $1,000 on GMAT prep through 8/20! Learn more here >
GMAT selfstudy has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!




Re: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 &nbs
[#permalink]
17 Sep 2012, 23:25



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 37 posts ]



