Financier wrote:
Good score! Were your SCs very difficult? I'm asking because I gave GMAT almost yesterday and was impessed by the ultra-brutal SCs, whereas 3 RC and all CR were relatively easy.
I found them to be about on par with the GMAT Prep CAT SCs. Difficult but not insurmountable. I mean, I'm sure I didn't get every SC right, so there must have been a few tricky ones, but overall I didn't find them as ultra-brutal as you suggest. In fact, I found one of the RC passages and at least one CR question to be harder than I'd seen before in practice. Because I had so much time to spare, when I was on this hard-to-crack CR that was the second-to-last question for me in the verbal section, I literally spent about 7 minutes on it. Read, re-read, went through each answer choice, thought about how each choice would affect the stimulus, and just could not come up with a good answer. But I was not about to give up on this question because I had the time and I know how important every question can be. Then it just snapped and I figured out what they were looking for. So, anyway, back to your question about whether I thought the SC part of verbal was overly difficult, the short answer is: not really.
gurpreetsingh wrote:
Do you have any idea, how many boldface, method of reasoning and parallel reasoning CR's you got?
I actually did not see one boldface question, if by this you mean the type where there is a passage with two bolded phrases and they ask what the purpose of each bold phrase is. Not
exactly sure what is defined by method of reasoning and parallel reasoning question types, probably because I never really studied any of the prep materials for CR. I do recall one CR question that I found relatively difficult that I think is probably what you mean by a method of reasoning question. Although I recall it, I don't want to reiterate the whole stimulus considering it is the property of GMAC and I don't want my scores to get canceled, god forbid (don't think it is likely, but better safe than sorry). But the answer (at least my answer) went something like:
The logic of the author is most similar to which of the following?
A) Someone finds causality between two phenomena without considering that a third phenomena might be the intervening cause of both.
B)...
C)...
D)...
E)...
I think that was the only question of that type I saw on the test. As far as parallel reasoning, not really sure how such a question would be structured. If you mean something like this question:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-1000-tobacco-smoke-53965.html, then I don't think I saw any of this question type on the test. Sorry I cannot be more specific, but hope that helps a little. If this isn't what you meant let me know and I'll revise my response accordingly.
As for everyone else, thanks for the appreciation. Let me know if you have any more questions that I might be able to help with.