Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 14:06 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 14:06

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33014 [1]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 71
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6923
Own Kudos [?]: 63695 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities i [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply

Question 3


Quote:
Hi, pls help me with this question-

It can be inferred that the author of the passage considers Allen's research on seventeenth-century Massachusetts colonies to be

(A) inconsequential but interesting "interesting" is not mentioned

(B) largely derivative "largely" is too extreme and not mentioned

(C) detailed but problematic correct answer, refer to "meticulous scholarship on the detailed microcosmic level" for "detailed", and author's tone for "problematic"

(D) highly commendable contradicts author's tone

(E) overly theoretical this is not mentioned

Here why is option B wrong? Since the passage does mention that Allen's study is based on micro issues and derives conclusions largely from village regions. I chose B considering that it is largely derivative of the village and micro areas. Pls let me know why is it wrong.

As you correctly suggest, Allen's study "derives" conclusions from his study of "the records of village institutions." But answer choice (B) is using the word "derivative" in a different sense.

More specifically, something can be described as "derivative" if it lacks originality. In other words, if I call something derivative, I'm criticizing it for lacking originality.

While the author criticizes Allen for certain problems (such as ignoring national issues), he or she never criticizes Allen for lacking originality. For that reason, we can't infer the author thinks Allen's work is "largely derivative," and (B) is wrong.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2023
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Send PM
Re: Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities i [#permalink]
I don't understand why E in the 2nd qn is wrong. After all, the sentence in the passage mentions "this discovery illuminates historical understanding". Doesn't that mean this is insightful?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Nov 2022
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 634
Location: Lebanon
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V37
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
Send PM
Re: Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities i [#permalink]
Can anyone explain why the answer to question 1 is A and not B? To be honest I am confused as I do not see how A is correct and B is wrong. A cannot be inferred from the 1st sentence of the last paragraph, else, why did we eliminate B?
I am not satisfied with the explanations given so far, as they have not explained in detail the answer choices. Any experts willing to chime in? GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyMurray GMATninja2
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14836
Own Kudos [?]: 64976 [2]
Given Kudos: 428
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities i [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
danymasri98 wrote:
Can anyone explain why the answer to question 1 is A and not B? To be honest I am confused as I do not see how A is correct and B is wrong. A cannot be inferred from the 1st sentence of the last paragraph, else, why did we eliminate B?
I am not satisfied with the explanations given so far, as they have not explained in detail the answer choices. Any experts willing to chime in? GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyMurray GMATninja2



1. The passage suggests that Professor Clive Holmes would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

(A) An understanding of seventeenth-century English local institutions requires a consideration of national issues.
(B) The "country community" school of seventeenth- century English history distorts historical evidence in order to establish continuity between old and new institutions.
(C) Most historians distort reality by focusing on national concerns to the exclusion of local concerns.
(D) National issues are best understood from the perspective of those at the local level.
(E) Local histories of seventeenth-century English villages have contributed little to the understanding of village life.

It is an extrapolatory question. The answer is not written in the passage. We have to infer it based on what is given.

We know very little about Professor Clive. There is just one sentence:
Allen's work is a rather extreme example of the "country community" school of seventeenth-century English history whose intemperate excesses in removing all national issues from the history of that period have been exposed by Professor Clive Holmes.

Professor Clive has exposed the inadequacy of that school of history which removes all national issues and focuses only on local institutions.

So what would Professor Clive agree with?

(A) An understanding of seventeenth-century English local institutions requires a consideration of national issues.

Correct. He is likely to agree that to understand local institutions, we need to consider national issues.

(B) The "country community" school of seventeenth- century English history distorts historical evidence in order to establish continuity between old and new institutions.

All we know is the Professor Clive considers national issues important in a study of history. Did he believe that "country community" school distorts historical evidence in order to establish continuity between old and new institutions? We don't know. Forget Professor Clive, we don't even know whether the author believes this even though he uses these words at various places.
The author has mentioned that Alan has created a distorted picture of reality by ignoring many differences. He says Alan suggests there was continuity. But the author doesn't say that Alan distorted evidence in order to establish continuity. He says that Alan ignored some evidence. Was it to establish continuity? - he doesn't say.
All in all, (B) is certainly not the answer.

Answer (A)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities i [#permalink]
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13966 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne