Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 01:09 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 01:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Posts: 338
Own Kudos [?]: 151 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 3093
Own Kudos [?]: 4121 [1]
Given Kudos: 1851
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Posts: 115
Own Kudos [?]: 79 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
WE:Other (Other)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2020
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: China
Send PM
Determine whether z > 0? [#permalink]
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Posts: 115
Own Kudos [?]: 79 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
WE:Other (Other)
Send PM
Re: Determine whether z > 0? [#permalink]
Laila12618 wrote:
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device



A is not sufficient because

z can be between 0 and 1 also along with z<-1
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619310 [1]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: Determine whether z > 0? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Laila12618 wrote:
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device


(z + 1)(z)(z – 1) < 0

Here is how to solve the above inequality easily. The "roots", in ascending order, are -1, 0, and 1, which gives us 4 ranges:

    \(z < -1\);

    \(-1 < z < 0\);

    \(0 < z < 1\);

    \(z > 1\).

Next, test an extreme value for \(z\): if \(z\) is some large enough number, say 10, then all three multiples will be positive, giving a positive result for the whole expression. So when \(z > 1\), the expression is positive. Now the trick: as in the 4th range, the expression is positive, then in the 3rd it'll be negative, in the 2nd it'll be positive, and finally in the 1st, it'll be negative: \(\text{(- + - +)}\). So, the ranges when the expression is negative are: \(z < -1\) and \(0 < z < 1\).

P.S. You can apply this technique to any inequality of the form \((ax - b)(cx - d)(ex - f)... > 0\) or \( < 0\). If one of the factors is in the form \((b - ax)\) instead of \((ax - b)\), simply rewrite it as \(-(ax - b)\) and adjust the inequality sign accordingly. For example, consider the inequality \((4 - x)(2 + x) > 0\). Rewrite it as \(-(x - 4)(2 + x) > 0\). Multiply by -1 and flip the sign: \((x - 4)(2 + x) < 0\). The "roots", in ascending order, are -2 and 4, giving us three ranges: \(x < -2\), \(-2 < x < 4\), and \(x > 4\). If \(x\) is some large enough number, say 100, both factors will be positive, yielding a positive result for the entire expression. Thus, when \(x > 4\), the expression is positive. Now, apply the alternating sign trick: as the expression is positive in the 3rd range, it will be negative in the 2nd range, and positive in the 1st range: \(\text{(+ - +)}\). Therefore, the ranges where the expression is negative are: \(-2 < x < 4\).
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Determine whether z > 0? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92948 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne