Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 10:11 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 10:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rn1112
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
227
 [3]
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 321
Kudos: 227
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
11,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,465
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nabneet
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 19 Aug 2024
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
WE:Other (Other)
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
Posts: 105
Kudos: 120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Laila12618
Joined: 31 May 2020
Last visit: 01 May 2024
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: China
Posts: 45
Kudos: 223
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Nabneet
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 19 Aug 2024
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
WE:Other (Other)
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
Posts: 105
Kudos: 120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Laila12618
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device


A is not sufficient because

z can be between 0 and 1 also along with z<-1
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,827
Own Kudos:
811,227
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,827
Kudos: 811,227
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Laila12618
I don’t understand… for statement 1 the inequality sign does not have the equal sign so none of z-1, z, z+1 can be zero.
Consequently, all three numbers, which are consecutive, must be negative in order for their product to be negative >>> z must be negative and A would look like the correct answer.

Anyone can explain why statement 1 is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device

(z + 1)(z)(z – 1) < 0

Here is how to solve the above inequality easily. The "roots", in ascending order, are -1, 0, and 1, which gives us 4 ranges:

    \(z < -1\);

    \(-1 < z < 0\);

    \(0 < z < 1\);

    \(z > 1\).

Next, test an extreme value for \(z\): if \(z\) is some large enough number, say 10, then all three multiples will be positive, giving a positive result for the whole expression. So when \(z > 1\), the expression is positive. Now the trick: as in the 4th range, the expression is positive, then in the 3rd it'll be negative, in the 2nd it'll be positive, and finally in the 1st, it'll be negative: \(\text{(- + - +)}\). So, the ranges when the expression is negative are: \(z < -1\) and \(0 < z < 1\).

P.S. You can apply this technique to any inequality of the form \((ax - b)(cx - d)(ex - f)... > 0\) or \( < 0\). If one of the factors is in the form \((b - ax)\) instead of \((ax - b)\), simply rewrite it as \(-(ax - b)\) and adjust the inequality sign accordingly. For example, consider the inequality \((4 - x)(2 + x) > 0\). Rewrite it as \(-(x - 4)(2 + x) > 0\). Multiply by -1 and flip the sign: \((x - 4)(2 + x) < 0\). The "roots", in ascending order, are -2 and 4, giving us three ranges: \(x < -2\), \(-2 < x < 4\), and \(x > 4\). If \(x\) is some large enough number, say 100, both factors will be positive, yielding a positive result for the entire expression. Thus, when \(x > 4\), the expression is positive. Now, apply the alternating sign trick: as the expression is positive in the 3rd range, it will be negative in the 2nd range, and positive in the 1st range: \(\text{(+ - +)}\). Therefore, the ranges where the expression is negative are: \(-2 < x < 4\).
Moderators:
Math Expert
109827 posts
498 posts
212 posts