Last visit was: 08 May 2024, 07:44 It is currently 08 May 2024, 07:44

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93094
Own Kudos [?]: 622156 [0]
Given Kudos: 81798
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 1682
Own Kudos [?]: 1436 [0]
Given Kudos: 633
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 51
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93094
Own Kudos [?]: 622156 [0]
Given Kudos: 81798
Send PM
Re: Each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or [#permalink]
Expert Reply
donu wrote:
How isn't statement 83+27 = 110 not allowed by statement 2?


Each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or an tractor-driver, but not both. How many residents of Dashville are ranchers?

Since each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or a tractor-driver, but not both, we have r + t = 110, where r is the number of ranchers and t is the number of tractor-drivers.

(1) There are more than 81 ranchers who reside in Dashville

This implies that r > 81. However, the exact number of ranchers is still unclear. Not sufficient.

(2) The number of ranchers who reside in Dashville is less than three times the number of tractor-drivers who reside in Dashville

This implies r < 3t. Substituting t = 110 - r, we get r < 3(110 - r), which simplifies to r < 82.5. Still, the exact number of ranchers is unclear. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Combining the above, we get 81 < r < 82.5. Therefore, r must be 82. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2023
Status:Preparing for Exams
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 107
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or a tractor-driver, but not both. How many residents of Dashville are ranchers?


(1) There are more than 81 ranchers who reside in Dashville

(2) The number of ranchers who reside in Dashville is less than three times the number of tractor-drivers who reside in Dashville


Let Rangers be X and Tractor drivers be Y.
X+Y=110
We need to find x.

Statement 1: x > 81. Thus x can take any values such as 82,82,83, etc. Thus Insufficient.
Statement 2: x < 3y. There can multiple combinations of numbers which can satisfy this equation and still the sum of x & y equals 110. Thus Insufficient.

Combined 1 & 2: By addition the equations,
\( x- 81 > 0\)
\(-x+3y > 0\)

\(3y -81 > 0\)
\( y>27\)

Thus we now use x>81 and y>27 and find that only one solution satisfies the equations i.e., x=82 and y =28. Thus sufficient.

Option C is correct.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Each of the 110 residents in Dashville is either a rancher or [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
93094 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne