Expensive television advertising campaigns clearly help political

Option (C) is the correct answer because it directly supports the argument that expensive television advertising campaigns help political candidates win elections. It states that candidates who have more available campaign money are the ones who engage in expensive television advertising campaigns more frequently than their competitors.

By establishing a correlation between a candidate's available campaign funds and their decision to invest in expensive television advertising, option (C) reinforces the argument that campaign money plays a significant role in the outcome of elections. It implies that candidates with more financial resources are more likely to invest in television advertising, which gives them an advantage in terms of reaching a wider audience, increasing visibility, and potentially influencing voter behavior.

The statement in option (C) aligns with the initial claim that the candidate with the most campaign money ultimately wins, as it suggests a direct link between a candidate's financial strength and their ability to undertake expensive television advertising campaigns. Therefore, option (C) provides the strongest support for the argument.