Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:34)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
State tax officials, having had considerable success in persuading delinquent individuals to pay their back taxes through the incentive of reduced penalties, plan to adopt a similar approach in order to collect past due taxes from corporations.
The state tax plan outlined above assumes that
A. federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner (Off topic) B. stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes (this one looks like a 180 +vague off topic diversion one - though this is the right answer provided) C. corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for the same length of time that individual taxpayers are (its not about time - diversion) D. past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties (though this one state corporate or individual explicitly - even if I don't negate and take a straight approach - this one looks like the most direct assumption - considerable success with reduction - assumes my preceeding sentence?) E. penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals(percentages are not explicitly stated - so another diversion)
The assumption explicit is reduced fines will help tax officials to collect past due taxes from corporation
There are 2 choices - B and D to eliminate from
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
State tax officials, having had considerable success in persuading delinquent individuals to pay their back taxes through the incentive of reduced penalties, plan to adopt a similar approach in order to collect past due taxes from corporations.
The state tax plan outlined above assumes that
A. federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner (Off topic) B. stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes (this one looks like a 180 +vague off topic diversion one - though this is the right answer provided) C. corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for the same length of time that individual taxpayers are (its not about time - diversion) D. past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties (though this one state corporate or individual explicitly - even if I don't negate and take a straight approach - this one looks like the most direct assumption - considerable success with reduction - assumes my preceeding sentence?) E. penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals(percentages are not explicitly stated - so another diversion)
The assumption explicit is reduced fines will help tax officials to collect past due taxes from corporation
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.