Thanks to
GMATCoachBen 's astute observation that the
actual GMAT Focus ESRs indicate 8 DS questions on the Data Insights section, instead of the 6 DS questions that usually show up on the official practice exams, I've slightly updated my comparison table between the Classic GMAT and the GMAT Focus (now back to being known simply as the GMAT).
This is an important realization, because it means that
Data Sufficiency questions are more important to your Data Insights score than they appear on the official practice exams.
Please note that the numbers listed are estimates, as we do not yet know exactly how many experimental questions are on the GMAT Focus, and thus do not know for sure how many questions are counted. However,
the previous version of the GMAT included 15.2% experimentals, which—assuming that the Focus is constructed similarly—would mean that approximately 3 questions on each section of the GMAT Focus do not count.
3/20 = 15%
3/21 = 14.2%
3/23 = 13%
We have already seen evidence of two perfect GMAT Focus scores of 805 with one question wrong, so we know for sure that there are in fact experimental, uncounted questions on the Focus as well.
Today I read that someone scored a
Q82 (77%) with only one question wrong on Quant. In the meantime, some other people are earning Q90s with up to three questions wrong—all thanks to luck of the draw. That's brutal, GMAC!
UPDATE: The new GMAT Focus
Percentile and GMAT Classic Score Concordance Tables were finally released today! As I expected, the composite / total score percentiles did not change much for 2024. Note that the cutoff for 99% has increased from
705 to 715.
On the lower end of the score scale, the percentile changes are a little larger. For example, a score of 615 has decreased from
80% to 78%—and a score of 555 has gone all the way from
53% to 49%.
For those of who have already taken the GMAT Focus, you should see that any percentile changes have already taken effect in your official score reports.
So much for the huge drops in percentiles that certain scaremongering individuals predicted, supposedly supported by the (dubious) claim that GMAT Focus scores over the past year have been greaty inflated—a claim that has always relied on a flawed and incomplete set of anecdotal evidence.
Yes, of course some people (especially GMAT experts and private tutors like me) "are seeing" a high proportion of high Focus scores—because we teach GMAT for a living, and because those who score 700+ are the very test-takers most likely to share their scores publicly. However, this small and unrepresentiative sample size tells us nothing about overall Focus percentiles.
Instead, today's change was simply one the minor percentile adjustments that have always been made annually by GMAC, to both total (composite) and section scores.
https://www.mba.com/exams/gmat-exam/scores/understanding-your-scorehttps://www.mba.com/-/media/files/gmac/gmat/gmat-total-score-concordance-table_aug2024.pdf
Attachments

Screen Shot 2024-08-29 at 1.51.36 PM.png [ 38.93 KiB | Viewed 831 times ]

Screen Shot 2024-08-29 at 12.12.36 PM.png [ 84.84 KiB | Viewed 846 times ]