Hi DisciplinedPrep,
thanks for your kind reply.
Yes, i have deeply analized my stengths and weaknesses in each section.
Vebal: Being a Lawyer and an Italian (our academic language is said to be one of the most complex), i'm used to work everyday with even more difficult verbal contortions. I think i have a solid skill base in verbal subjects in general. (sectional scores in CATs 30 -31).
Streghts: Solid Skill Base, maniacal attention for every detail of a text, deep comprehension of what the Gmat Verbal part asks in every single part/kind of question.
Weaknesses: Strategy, time management, english vocabulary. I feel and i have given proof to myself that i can get to a any solution correctly. The problem is that i usually take twice as long as i should take for each answer. I have great results in static verbal quizzes, whereas i do many mistakes in the CATs. CATs do not reflect my real skills because i always randomly guess a good portion of the questions in order to finish in time. This could be coused by wrong strategies and poor english vocabulary (i take longer to read and catch details).
Quantitative: i started from a poor skill base in math fundamentals, because i haven't practiced anything similar in last 15 years, but i made a deep refresh in last 2 months. (sectional scores 39-40).
Strengths: natural logical approach, natural ability to find ''alternative solutions'', to think ''out of the box'' instead of answering questions with the mechanical approach. I answer faster than i do in the verbal part.
Weaknesses: I haven't find find my own method so far. I struggle with traditional meachanical approach to questions (i don't like long alegebraical semplifications). I prefer to use logic as well as to find alternative solutions using the given answers.
I need to practice more, possibily with some clear explainations. Fo far i only studied with a ''classical'' math teacher who focused more on improving my basic skills instead of helping me practically in solving gmat problems.