November 14, 2018 November 14, 2018 07:00 PM PST 08:00 PM PST Join the webinar and learn timemanagement tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! Nov. 14th at 7 PM PST November 15, 2018 November 15, 2018 10:00 PM MST 11:00 PM MST EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50544

If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jun 2018, 03:40
Question Stats:
67% (01:37) correct 33% (01:44) wrong based on 81 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 10

If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jun 2018, 03:58
Bunuel wrote: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c?
(1) a/c > b > 1
(2) ab > ac Option 1 Since a/c>b a is>c hence a+b>c sufficient Option 2 ab>ac which means b>c hence a+b>c sufficient Ans D



Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 42
GPA: 3.87

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 03:39
(1) a/c > b > 1 => a>bc>c => a>c => a + ( some thing positive) is always > c ==> Sufficient
(2) ab > ac if we consider some fractions here it will fail . a = 1/4 , b = 3/4 , c = 1 ==> No a = 2 , b = 3 , c = 1 ==> Yes ====> Insufficient
Option A



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 248

If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 04:24
B imo. 1) gives us a>bc but this is not sufficent to answer the question. If a=2, b=\(\frac{1}{2}\) and c=3 we get 2>\(\frac{3}{2}\). If we plug in the same values in the equation from the stem we receive: 2+\(\frac{1}{2}\)<3. This means that the inital statement would be incorrect. However, if we choose a=6, b=3 and c=1 and plug those values into the initial statement we receive: 6+3>9. This means that the initial statement would be correct. In conclusion, statement 1 is not sufficent. 2) can be converted to a>c so a+b>c will always be true. Hence, this statement is sufficient.
_________________
My goal: 700 GMAT score  REACHED  My debrief  first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)
If I could help you with my answer, consider giving me Kudos



Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 42

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 08:52
Masterscorp wrote: B imo.
1) gives us a>bc but this is not sufficent to answer the question. If a=2, b=\(\frac{1}{2}\) and c=3 we get 2>\(\frac{3}{2}\). If we plug in the same values in the equation from the stem we receive:
2+\(\frac{1}{2}\)<3. This means that the inital statement would be incorrect. However, if we choose a=6, b=3 and c=1 and plug those values into the initial statement we receive:
6+3>9. This means that the initial statement would be correct. In conclusion, statement 1 is not sufficent.
2) can be converted to a>c so a+b>c will always be true. Hence, this statement is sufficient. I think the first example doesn't qualify here. Since all the numbers are positive, the first expression can be written as a>bc>c This implies that a>c. The first example that you chose doesn't meet this criteria. If you try examples where a>c then you will see that this is always sufficient.



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 248

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 09:05
rajudantuluri wrote: Masterscorp wrote: B imo.
1) gives us a>bc but this is not sufficent to answer the question. If a=2, b=\(\frac{1}{2}\) and c=3 we get 2>\(\frac{3}{2}\). If we plug in the same values in the equation from the stem we receive:
2+\(\frac{1}{2}\)<3. This means that the inital statement would be incorrect. However, if we choose a=6, b=3 and c=1 and plug those values into the initial statement we receive:
6+3>9. This means that the initial statement would be correct. In conclusion, statement 1 is not sufficent.
2) can be converted to a>c so a+b>c will always be true. Hence, this statement is sufficient. I think the first example doesn't qualify here. Since all the numbers are positive, the first expression can be written as a>bc>c This implies that a>c. The first example that you chose doesn't meet this criteria. If you try examples where a>c then you will see that this is always sufficient. Can you please explain why the first example doesn't qualify in your opinion?
_________________
My goal: 700 GMAT score  REACHED  My debrief  first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)
If I could help you with my answer, consider giving me Kudos



Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 186

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 09:21
Since all are positive: (1) a/c > 1; a > c (1) b > c
Answer D. Each statement by itself is sufficient.



Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 42

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 12:27
Masterscorp wrote: rajudantuluri wrote: Masterscorp wrote: B imo.
1) gives us a>bc but this is not sufficent to answer the question. If a=2, b=\(\frac{1}{2}\) and c=3 we get 2>\(\frac{3}{2}\). If we plug in the same values in the equation from the stem we receive:
2+\(\frac{1}{2}\)<3. This means that the inital statement would be incorrect. However, if we choose a=6, b=3 and c=1 and plug those values into the initial statement we receive:
6+3>9. This means that the initial statement would be correct. In conclusion, statement 1 is not sufficent.
2) can be converted to a>c so a+b>c will always be true. Hence, this statement is sufficient. As stated before we must choose examples where a>c but the values you’ve chosen for a and c are 2, 3 respectively. So it doesn’t meet the criteria. I think the first example doesn't qualify here. Since all the numbers are positive, the first expression can be written as a>bc>c This implies that a>c. The first example that you chose doesn't meet this criteria. If you try examples where a>c then you will see that this is always sufficient. Can you please explain why the first example doesn't qualify in your opinion? As stated before, you need to choose values for a and c such that a is greater than c. You’ve chosen 2 and 3 respectively for a and c so it doesn’t meet the criteria



DS Forum Moderator
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 1365
Location: India

Re: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 20:12
Bunuel wrote: If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c?
(1) a/c > b > 1
(2) ab > ac (1) Since a/c > 1 and both a/c are positive, we can write a > c. Now b is a positive number, so adding b to a will further increase the value of a. So definitely a+b > c. Sufficient. (2) ab > ac. Since a is positive we can divide both sides by a to get b > c. Now a is a positive number, so adding a to be will further increase the value of b. So definitely a+b > c. Sufficient. Hence D answer



Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2017
Posts: 173

If a, b, and c are positive, is a + b > c? (1) a/c > b > 1 (2) ab > ac
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jun 2018, 21:10
Hello, @baru
(1) a/c > b > 1 => a>bc>c => a>c => a + ( some thing positive) is always > c ==> Sufficient
(2) ab > ac if we consider some fractions here it will fail . a = 1/4 , b = 3/4 , c = 1 ==> No a = 2 , b = 3 , c = 1 ==> Yes ====> Insufficient
Option A[/quote]
When we take statement2: ab>ac if we omit the common item "a", then we get b>c As per your reasoning of the first option, b + something(i.e. a) will always be greater than "c".
So, we can find a solution from both the options. And the answer is D. Hope it helps.



Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 10

Hi, I have a doubt with the question below, please help: Please refer to the attached screenshot. As per me the answer should be 8, however the answer as per the solution offered for this question is 800. Please help me understand where I am going wrong. Thanks in advance.
Attachments
doubt 2.png [ 148.67 KiB  Viewed 277 times ]










