GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 12:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

December 14, 2018

December 14, 2018

09:00 AM PST

10:00 AM PST

10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.
• ### The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

December 13, 2018

December 13, 2018

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

# If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 82
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 11:05
3
4
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:26) correct 40% (01:49) wrong based on 359 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51185
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2012, 03:09
5
1
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
##### General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51185
Re: Number Properties, Data sufficiency.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 11:25
4
1
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> the denominator must be positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> the denominator must be positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 765
Location: London

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 01:46
IF (1) is true, it implies K>1, which implies 1/K > 0

If (2) is true, it implies K>-1, which gives no information on the sign on 1/K

So (1) alone without (2) is sufficient to answer the question
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51185
Re: GMAT Prep CAT Inequalities question  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 00:20
Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.

tonebeeze wrote:
*should I always assume that the variable can be a real number, unless otherwise stated?

The GMAT is dealing only with Real Numbers: Integers, Fractions and Irrational Numbers. So all numbers on the GMAT are real numbers and otherwise never will be stated.
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 189
If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 19 Feb 2012, 03:08
4
If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Originally posted by samramandy on 24 Aug 2011, 10:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Feb 2012, 03:08, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question and added the OA
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 169
Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: If k <> 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k > 0 ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 04:32
It must be A.

Again it is not mentioned that k is an integer.

1) 1/k-1>0 => k can be any value greater than 1 to satisfy this equation hence 1/k >0; sufficient.
2) 1/1+k>0 => if k=0.5 then 1/k >0 it holds true, but if k=-0.5 this equation still holds whereas, 1/k<0; therefore not sufficient.

--
Ramandeep
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 201
Location: United States
WE: Supply Chain Management (Computer Hardware)
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 07:28
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
1. If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks

Turk

Which statement are you referring to?

In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51185
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 07:32
1
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks

Turk

Which statement are you referring to?

In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?

The question asks whether $$\frac{1}{k}$$ is positive. The numerator, which is 1, is positive, thus in order the fraction to be positive, the denominator must also be positive.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Posts: 67
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2016, 06:50
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks
CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2633
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2016, 07:04
WilDThiNg wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks

No, we are not assuming 0/0. When you are given a/b > 0 this means that the fraction a/b > 0 ---> 2 cases possible,

Case 1, either both a,b > 0 or

Case 2, both a,b < 0.

You can try the following examples to see the above 2 cases:

Case 1: a=1, b = 2, a/b = 0.5 > 0

Case 2, a=-1, b = -5 , a/b = 0.2 > 0

But if lets say you have a=-1 and b = 2 or a=2 and b= -3 , a/b <0 and NOT >0.

You can even remember this that in order for a fraction a/b to be >0 ---> both a,b MUST have the same signs. Either both of them are >0 or both of them are negative.

Coming back to the question,

When you are given 1/k > 0 ---> 1 is already >0 so based on the 'rule' above, k must also be positive in order for 1 and k to have the same 'sign'. Thus k>0.

Similarly, if 1/(k-1) > 0 ---> k-1 > 0 ---> k >1 etc.

Hope this helps.
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 6629
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 04:34
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

When it comes to inequality DS questions, 2 things are important at all times. First is square. Secondly, when range of que includes range of con, the con is sufficient.
Modify the original condition and the question. Multiply k^2 on the both equations and the sign of inequality doesn't change as k^2 is still a positive integer even when it's multiplied. There is 1 variable(k), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 1 equation, for 1) 1 equation, for 2) q equation, which is likely to make D the answer.
For 1), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que includes the range of con, which is sufficient.
For 2), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que doesn't include the range of con, which is not sufficient

-> For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only \$99 for 3 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"

Current Student
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2627
Schools: Boston U '20 (M)
GRE 1: Q169 V154
Re: If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2016, 20:58
Bull78 wrote:
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.

Fun Fact => if K was an integer than then D would be the choice.
_________________

MBA Financing:- INDIAN PUBLIC BANKS vs PRODIGY FINANCE!

Getting into HOLLYWOOD with an MBA!

The MOST AFFORDABLE MBA programs!

STONECOLD's BRUTAL Mock Tests for GMAT-Quant(700+)

AVERAGE GRE Scores At The Top Business Schools!

Intern
Joined: 06 Jan 2016
Posts: 25
Location: Spain
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2017, 10:14
stonecold wrote:
Bull78 wrote:
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.

Fun Fact => if K was an integer than then D would be the choice.

So fun, that I, in fact, committed that mistake xD
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 &nbs [#permalink] 20 Dec 2017, 10:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by