GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 May 2019, 02:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2010, 12:05
3
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (01:30) correct 38% (01:46) wrong based on 277 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2012, 04:09
5
1
If k#0, 1 or -1 is \(\frac{1}{k}> 0\)?

Basically the question asks: is \(k>0\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{k-1}> 0\) --> denominator is positive: \(k-1>0\)--> \(k>1\), hence \(\frac{1}{k}>0\). Sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{1}{k+1}> 0\)--> denominator is positive: \(k+1>0\) --> \(k>-1\), hence \(k\) can be negative as well as positive: \(\frac{1}{k}\) may or may not be \(>0\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
General Discussion
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271
Re: Number Properties, Data sufficiency.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2010, 12:25
4
1
If k#0, 1 or -1 is \(\frac{1}{k}> 0\)?

Basically the question asks: is \(k>0\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{k-1}> 0\) --> the denominator must be positive: \(k-1>0\)--> \(k>1\), hence \(\frac{1}{k}>0\). Sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{1}{k+1}> 0\)--> the denominator must be positive: \(k+1>0\) --> \(k>-1\), hence \(k\) can be negative as well as positive: \(\frac{1}{k}\) may or may not be \(>0\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 759
Location: London
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: GMAT Prep: Inequalities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2010, 02:46
IF (1) is true, it implies K>1, which implies 1/K > 0

If (2) is true, it implies K>-1, which gives no information on the sign on 1/K

So (1) alone without (2) is sufficient to answer the question
_________________
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271
Re: GMAT Prep CAT Inequalities question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2010, 01:20
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 183
If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 19 Feb 2012, 04:08
4
If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Originally posted by samramandy on 24 Aug 2011, 11:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Feb 2012, 04:08, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question and added the OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 155
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If k <> 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k > 0 ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2013, 05:32
It must be A.

Again it is not mentioned that k is an integer.

1) 1/k-1>0 => k can be any value greater than 1 to satisfy this equation hence 1/k >0; sufficient.
2) 1/1+k>0 => if k=0.5 then 1/k >0 it holds true, but if k=-0.5 this equation still holds whereas, 1/k<0; therefore not sufficient.

--
Ramandeep
_________________
--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 203
Location: United States
WE: Supply Chain Management (Computer Hardware)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2015, 08:28
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
1. If k#0, 1 or -1 is \(\frac{1}{k}> 0\)?


(1) \(\frac{1}{k-1}> 0\) --> \(k-1>0\)--> \(k>1\), hence \(\frac{1}{k}>0\). Sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{1}{k+1}> 0\)--> \(k+1>0\) --> \(k>-1\), hence \(k\) can be negative as well as positive: \(\frac{1}{k}\) may or may not be \(>0\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.


Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks


Turk


Which statement are you referring to?


In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2015, 08:32
1
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks


Turk


Which statement are you referring to?


In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?


The question asks whether \(\frac{1}{k}\) is positive. The numerator, which is 1, is positive, thus in order the fraction to be positive, the denominator must also be positive.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Posts: 66
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2016, 07:50
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is \(\frac{1}{k}> 0\)?

Basically the question asks: is \(k>0\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{k-1}> 0\) --> denominator is positive: \(k-1>0\)--> \(k>1\), hence \(\frac{1}{k}>0\). Sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{1}{k+1}> 0\)--> denominator is positive: \(k+1>0\) --> \(k>-1\), hence \(k\) can be negative as well as positive: \(\frac{1}{k}\) may or may not be \(>0\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks
CEO
CEO
avatar
S
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2626
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2016, 08:04
WilDThiNg wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is \(\frac{1}{k}> 0\)?

Basically the question asks: is \(k>0\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{k-1}> 0\) --> denominator is positive: \(k-1>0\)--> \(k>1\), hence \(\frac{1}{k}>0\). Sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{1}{k+1}> 0\)--> denominator is positive: \(k+1>0\) --> \(k>-1\), hence \(k\) can be negative as well as positive: \(\frac{1}{k}\) may or may not be \(>0\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks


No, we are not assuming 0/0. When you are given a/b > 0 this means that the fraction a/b > 0 ---> 2 cases possible,

Case 1, either both a,b > 0 or

Case 2, both a,b < 0.

You can try the following examples to see the above 2 cases:

Case 1: a=1, b = 2, a/b = 0.5 > 0

Case 2, a=-1, b = -5 , a/b = 0.2 > 0

But if lets say you have a=-1 and b = 2 or a=2 and b= -3 , a/b <0 and NOT >0.

You can even remember this that in order for a fraction a/b to be >0 ---> both a,b MUST have the same signs. Either both of them are >0 or both of them are negative.

Coming back to the question,

When you are given 1/k > 0 ---> 1 is already >0 so based on the 'rule' above, k must also be positive in order for 1 and k to have the same 'sign'. Thus k>0.

Similarly, if 1/(k-1) > 0 ---> k-1 > 0 ---> k >1 etc.

Hope this helps.
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 7372
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2016, 05:34
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0


When it comes to inequality DS questions, 2 things are important at all times. First is square. Secondly, when range of que includes range of con, the con is sufficient.
Modify the original condition and the question. Multiply k^2 on the both equations and the sign of inequality doesn't change as k^2 is still a positive integer even when it's multiplied. There is 1 variable(k), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 1 equation, for 1) 1 equation, for 2) q equation, which is likely to make D the answer.
For 1), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que includes the range of con, which is sufficient.
For 2), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que doesn't include the range of con, which is not sufficient
Therefore, the answer is A.


-> For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only $149 for 3 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"
Current Student
User avatar
D
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2617
Schools: Boston U '20 (M)
GRE 1: Q169 V154
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2016, 21:58
Bull78 wrote:
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.


Fun Fact => if K was an integer than then D would be the choice.
_________________
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jan 2016
Posts: 27
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2017, 11:14
stonecold wrote:
Bull78 wrote:
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.


Fun Fact => if K was an integer than then D would be the choice.


So fun, that I, in fact, committed that mistake xD
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11013
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2019, 12:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2019, 12:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.