Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Nov. 17, 7 AM PST. Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2012, 08:03
1
9
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2013, 01:59
Bunuel wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
(2) n = 3. Clearly insufficient.
Answer: A.
For statement (1), I understand how you arrived at \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\) but how does this equation tell you whether b-a is at least twice the value of 3^n-2^n?
For example, if i sub in n=1 into the equation, it is true that b-a is at least twice the value (b-a= 5 and 3^n-2^n = 1 then 1*2). However, if i sub in n=2, the equation no longer is true as b-a then becomes 19 and the right side of the equation then becomes 10, which is not at least twice the value.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2013, 12:01
bulletpoint wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
(2) n = 3. Clearly insufficient.
Answer: A.
For statement (1), I understand how you arrived at \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\) but how does this equation tell you whether b-a is at least twice the value of 3^n-2^n?
For example, if i sub in n=1 into the equation, it is true that b-a is at least twice the value (b-a= 5 and 3^n-2^n = 1 then 1*2). However, if i sub in n=2, the equation no longer is true as b-a then becomes 19 and the right side of the equation then becomes 10, which is not at least twice the value.
What am i missing here?
For the first statement after some manipulation the question becomes: is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? Irrespective of the actual value of n, 3^n will always be greater than zero, thus the answer to the question is YES.
_________________
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2014, 23:12
Do you think that it's better to approach this problem by plugging in numbers for n (as long as you're sure you can do it fast for cases n=1 and n=2), or to do the problem algebraically (which you know will take ~45-90seconds to crunch)?
Would be particularly interested in getting Bunuel's take...Thanks!
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2014, 05:06
warriorsquared wrote:
Do you think that it's better to approach this problem by plugging in numbers for n (as long as you're sure you can do it fast for cases n=1 and n=2), or to do the problem algebraically (which you know will take ~45-90seconds to crunch)?
Would be particularly interested in getting Bunuel's take...Thanks!
You should take the approach which fits you the best.
_________________
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2014, 09:09
1
Bunuel wrote:
suhaschan wrote:
Can someone please show me the simplification as to how the equation becomes whether 3^n > 0?
\(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\);
\(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\);
Cancel \(-2*2^{n}\): \(3*3^{n}\geq{2*3^n}\);
Subtract 2*3^n from both sides: \(3*3^{n}-2*3^n\geq{0}\);
\(3^{n}\geq{0}\)
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel, In the end instead of subtracting \(2*3^n\) from both sides, can we cancel \(3^n\) from both sides (as it's always positive) and reach \(3>2\) making the statement sufficient? Is that also a correct approach? Thanks.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2014, 01:55
2
Dienekes wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
suhaschan wrote:
Can someone please show me the simplification as to how the equation becomes whether 3^n > 0?
\(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\);
\(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\);
Cancel \(-2*2^{n}\): \(3*3^{n}\geq{2*3^n}\);
Subtract 2*3^n from both sides: \(3*3^{n}-2*3^n\geq{0}\);
\(3^{n}\geq{0}\)
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel, In the end instead of subtracting \(2*3^n\) from both sides, can we cancel \(3^n\) from both sides (as it's always positive) and reach \(3>2\) making the statement sufficient? Is that also a correct approach? Thanks.
Yes, this also would be a correct way of solving.
_________________
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2015, 05:45
Bunuel wrote:
suhaschan wrote:
Can someone please show me the simplification as to how the equation becomes whether 3^n > 0?
\(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\);
\(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\);
Cancel \(-2*2^{n}\): \(3*3^{n}\geq{2*3^n}\);
Subtract 2*3^n from both sides: \(3*3^{n}-2*3^n\geq{0}\);
\(3^{n}\geq{0}\)
Hope it's clear.
You could stop at the part I have boldfaced to realize that the statement is sufficient, no? I mean \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\); clearly shows that it it IS bigger. (Given that n is a positive integer)
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2015, 13:20
bulletpoint wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
(2) n = 3. Clearly insufficient.
Answer: A.
For statement (1), I understand how you arrived at \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\) but how does this equation tell you whether b-a is at least twice the value of 3^n-2^n?
For example, if i sub in n=1 into the equation, it is true that b-a is at least twice the value (b-a= 5 and 3^n-2^n = 1 then 1*2). However, if i sub in n=2, the equation no longer is true as b-a then becomes 19 and the right side of the equation then becomes 10, which is not at least twice the value.
What am i missing here?
How did you get that the right side of the equation is 10?? 3^2 = 9 and 2^2 = 4 which means 5. 5 X 2 = 10. 19 > 10.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Aug 2017, 08:45
It is easier if you take any positive integer value of n. Statement 1: Suppose n=1 (least value) then b-a= 9-4=5 which is 5 times more than 3-2=1 In fact, b-a is actually 3^(n+1) - 2^(n+1) which will always be far greater than 3^n - 2^n as the value of n increases. sufficient. Statement 2: there is no value for b-a. Insufficient.
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2017, 18:42
Bunuel wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
(2) n = 3. Clearly insufficient.
Answer: A.
Hi Bunuel
3*3^n>=2.3^n
We can divide 3^n on both sides then we will be left with 3>2 right?
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2017, 18:43
Bunuel wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the value of 3^n - 2^n?
Question: is \(b-a\geq{2(3^n - 2^n)}\)?
(1) a= 2^(n+1) and b= 3^(n+1). The question becomes: is \(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}\geq{2*(3^n - 2^n)}\)? --> is \(3*3^{n}-2*2^{n}\geq{2*3^n-2*2^{n}\)? --> is \(3^{n}\geq{0}\)? 3^n is always more than zero, so this statement is sufficient.
(2) n = 3. Clearly insufficient.
Answer: A.
Hi Bunuel
3*3^n>=2.3^n
We can divide 3^n on both sides then we will be left with 3>2 right?
So, statement A is sufficient
Please guide me if Im wrong
gmatclubot
Re: If n is a positive integer, is the value of b - a at least twice the &nbs
[#permalink]
13 Sep 2017, 18:43
close
68% (01:29) correct 
