If zt < -3, is z < 4 ? (1) z < 9 (2) t < -4

Vote for E

i did it this way


(A) when Z < 9

if (Z = 8 and t = -1/2)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (NO)


if (Z = 2 and t = -1/2)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (Yes)

Data not sufficient

----------------------------

(B) t < -4

if (Z = 8 and t = -5)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (NO)


if (Z = 2 and t = -5)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (Yes)

Data not sufficient

-----------------------------

(C) combine when Z < 9 and t < -4

if (Z = 8 and t = -5)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (NO)


if (Z = 2 and t = -5)

zt < -3 = true

Z < 4 (Yes)

Data not sufficient

there for E

Hi Bunuel and other experts,

When you do this(number picking) it seems so simply! However, number picking is my Achilles' Heel. It is just so frustratingly difficult for me to come up with right numbers.

When I micro-analyze my thinking process while I try to come up with right values to show counter examples this is what I see: I first need to ensure z <9 and then make sure that t < -4 and then ensure that zt< -3 with the aim of getting a NO for z<4. Even though I am using 'then' after every decision, the fact is- to generate right values, you essentially need to make these 4 decisions simultaneously. I simply dont know how I can do this in 20-30 seconds without befuddling my short term memory apparatus. I am saying 20-30 secs as in most of the hard questions you will have to rule out st-A, st-B and A+B. thus you will make 5-6 such decisions for every question.

When I solve such questions I am either totally flustered or take more than 4 mins. Are there efficient ways to do this and which will work for most of the hard problems (inequality, modulus, reciprocal, neg/pos and their combination) etc..in less than 2-3 mins?
Thanks!

zt < -3 implies either z>0 and t<0 or z<0 and t>0
(1) we ain't told anything abt t... Also, z can be 2 or 4 producing a Y/N cases
(2) at least we know t is <0; but we dont know whether z>4 or <4.

Both alone insufff.

Taken together, tsst: z=2, t=-5 we get zt = -10 (<-3)
Response to stem is Yes, z < 4

Also, take z=4 and t=-5 we get zt = -20 (<-3)
Response is No z is not < 4.

So, E should be OA.

i missed this question.
this test a basic point
t<-4 so we divide both side by t and change the way of equality
zt<-3
z>-3/t=-3/-4=3/4
insufficient.

\(zt<-3 \ \cap \ z<4\) \(\implies z(t+1)<1\)

\(Combining \ both \ statements:\)

\(z=8, t=-5 \implies 8(-5)<1 \implies (YES)\)

\(z=-9, t=-5 \implies -8(-5)<1 \implies (NO)\)

Hello experts, why B is not sufficient? When substitute t=-5 and we can get z <0.6. Am I missing something?

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.