Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 18:38 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 18:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32918 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In 1971, Robert James Fischer (nicknamed Bobby) shocked the chess worl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
EDUZENI wrote:
I am not able to understand why B is the answer for question no 2.Please explain Q2


2. Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward the subject of the passage?

(A) He feels a deep sadness that Fischer was so unhinged by the events of his life.
(B) He finds Fischer’s ultimate fate tragic, but also finds fault with Fischer.
(C) He feels Fischer was overrated, and attempt to prove his opinion with facts.
(D) Fischer was a misunderstood genius who lacked for companionship, the author feels.
(E) The author thinks Fischer should have made more of an effort to curb his ego.

Question is asking about the author's attitude towards the subject of the passage i.e. towards Fischer.
So, now if we look at the passage below, we will get two types of the statements - One is factual (highlighted in red) and second is Author opinion (highlighted in green).


In 1971, Robert James Fischer (nicknamed Bobby) shocked the chess world by winning 19 consecutive games against an extremely high level of competition. This feat has been compared to throwing back-toback no-hitters in major league baseball. During his peak playing period, from the mid 1960s into the early ’70s, players spoke of “Fischer Fever,” where they felt ill just having to play against him. Just as with José Rail Capablanca, Fischer had an aura of invincibility — which wasn’t far from the truth. Fischer was head and shoulders above the best players of his day.

His abrupt withdrawal from chess was tragic. Rumors of Fischer sightings were rampant, and the public was often tantalized by stories of his impending reemergence. Unfortunately, Fischer waited more than 20 years before playing in public again. His behavior, always intense, became increasingly odd over the years and prevented him from ever again competing at the highest level.


(A) He feels a deep sadness that Fischer was so unhinged by the events of his life.
Firstly, no where in the passage author shows his DEEP sadness. Secondly, is the author sad by all the events of Fischer's life? Answer is No.

(B) He finds Fischer’s ultimate fate tragic, but also finds fault with Fischer.
Look at the lines/words highlighted in green in the second paragraph.

(C) He feels Fischer was overrated, and attempt to prove his opinion with facts.
The Author has not stated this in the passage.

(D) Fischer was a misunderstood genius who lacked for companionship, the author feels.
Again, author has not stated this in the passage.

(E) The author thinks Fischer should have made more of an effort to curb his ego.
Same, author has not stated this in the passage. refer to text highlighted in green.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32918 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1971, Robert James Fischer (nicknamed Bobby) shocked the chess worl [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Pathshala wrote:
In the following question (Question number 3 of passage), how can we infer statement D?
My understanding:-
The passage states that "Just as with José Rail Capablanca, Fischer had an aura of invincibility".
Does it mean that José Rail Capablanca is also a chess player? I don't think so.
José Rail Capablanca might be invincible in any other activity/ sports.


3. Which of the following statements most accurately describes a reasonable inference from the passage?

(A) Fischer could have benefitted from more intense therapy.
(B) Chess is best understood through metaphors from another sport, such as baseball.
(C) A man of Fischer’s talents is almost certain to face tragedy.
(D) José Rail Capablanca was also a successful chess player with a high degree of self-confidence.
(E) Chess is a very complicated game.


Official Explanation


3. Which of the following statements most accurately describes a reasonable inference from the passage?

Explanation

Choice (D) is best here. The author’s reference to Capablanca means that he sees a connection between Fishcer and the other chess player. It’s not too much of a stretch to infer that they shared some characteristics, as seen in Choice (D).

Answer: D
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 1971, Robert James Fischer (nicknamed Bobby) shocked the chess worl [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne