Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 0308:30 AM PST
-09:30 AM PST
Wondering about your chances for top MBA programs? Join ARINGO for a concise Q&A session where we'll evaluate profiles, estimate school prospects, and offer expert tips.
Dec 0407:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Join us for a transformative live session where we'll demystify GMAT Algebra and show you how to master three of the most challenging topics: linear inequalities, quadratic inequalities, and absolute values.- Dec 06
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
In this video, we uncover the top errors applicants unknowingly make during MBA interviews and provide actionable tips to avoid them. Watch it carefully to avoid the common mistakes committed by applicants in delivering interviews. 
Dec 0711:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Dec 08
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to evaluate your current skill level, learn process skills, and solve through tough Arithmetic questions.
03 Mar 2022, 11:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
GMATNinja
tejyr
Anyone pls explain how Q4(The author of the passage refers to Washington call ... In order to) the answer is d.
I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)
Posted from my mobile device
The OA is in fact (D), as listed in the 2017 Verbal review (question #77).I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)
Posted from my mobile device
Quote:
The editorial surprised many African Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter.
On one end of the spectrum, you have Washington, an accommodationist. On the other end, you have Trotter, a confrontationist. Rather than aligning himself with either side consistently, "Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter."Du Bois was often viewed as a "chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington." However, in some instances, he would be on Washington's side. For example, Du Bois supported Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. This is evidence that Du Bois would shift his political views rather than firmly aligning himself with either side.
(A) is wrong because Du Bois did not have a "characteristic position on the continuum between accommodationism and confrontationism." The call to African Americans in 1895 does not show that Du Bois regularly aligned himself with accommodationism. Rather, it showed that he was willing to SHIFT his position along the continuum.
(D) is the best answer.
GMATNinja
I am still confused between A and D.
By characteristic position, I understand that because Du Bois kept on shifting his position, it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism depending upon the situation (but not both together at any particular point in time). So any answer choice pointing out any one of the 2 positions may be the correct answer for the 1895 sentence purpose per se.
I marked A because the question asks purpose of Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. I would have marked D if the question would have asked the purpose of 1903 sentence because there is a contrasting word "however" in this sentence which actually indicates the tendency to shift political positions. On the contrary, 1895 sentence actually plays the role of introducing his fluctuating (shifting) characteristic position as accommodationism basis the situation in that year (it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism as he keeps on shifting)- what option A states. Then in 1903, he shifted his characteristic position- what option D states.
I understand the OA is D so we cannot challenge the same. However, the explanation is not satisfactory basis my above contention. Hope you could provide some better explanation.
22 Mar 2022, 09:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 4
Kushchokhani
GMATNinja
tejyr
Anyone pls explain how Q4(The author of the passage refers to Washington call ... In order to) the answer is d.
I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)
Posted from my mobile device
The OA is in fact (D), as listed in the 2017 Verbal review (question #77).I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)
Posted from my mobile device
Quote:
The editorial surprised many African Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter.
On one end of the spectrum, you have Washington, an accommodationist. On the other end, you have Trotter, a confrontationist. Rather than aligning himself with either side consistently, "Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter."Du Bois was often viewed as a "chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington." However, in some instances, he would be on Washington's side. For example, Du Bois supported Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. This is evidence that Du Bois would shift his political views rather than firmly aligning himself with either side.
(A) is wrong because Du Bois did not have a "characteristic position on the continuum between accommodationism and confrontationism." The call to African Americans in 1895 does not show that Du Bois regularly aligned himself with accommodationism. Rather, it showed that he was willing to SHIFT his position along the continuum.
(D) is the best answer.
GMATNinja
I am still confused between A and D.
By characteristic position, I understand that because Du Bois kept on shifting his position, it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism depending upon the situation (but not both together at any particular point in time). So any answer choice pointing out any one of the 2 positions may be the correct answer for the 1895 sentence purpose per se.
I marked A because the question asks purpose of Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. I would have marked D if the question would have asked the purpose of 1903 sentence because there is a contrasting word "however" in this sentence which actually indicates the tendency to shift political positions. On the contrary, 1895 sentence actually plays the role of introducing his fluctuating (shifting) characteristic position as accommodationism basis the situation in that year (it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism as he keeps on shifting)- what option A states. Then in 1903, he shifted his characteristic position- what option D states.
I understand the OA is D so we cannot challenge the same. However, the explanation is not satisfactory basis my above contention. Hope you could provide some better explanation.
Similarly, you wouldn't say that Du Bois held a "characteristic position" of supporting Washington in 1895 or supporting Trotter in 1903 -- that's way too narrow to be characteristic. Du Bois' only characteristic position is that he DIDN'T consistently pick a side.
So, why did the author discuss Washington's call to African Americans in 1895? Think about the structure of the first paragraph to answer that question:
- First, the author introduces a position: Du Bois' accommodationist message during WWI.
- Then, the author states that this position surprised people who saw Du Bois as confrontationist.
- Then, the author makes his/her argument: it should NOT be surprising, because Du Bois "often" shifted positions.
- Finally, the author includes two examples as evidence for this argument.
From this, it's clear that the author's purpose is to support the argument that Du Bois often shifted positions. That's what we're looking for in an answer choice. We find it in (D), and you can eliminate (A).
I hope that helps!
28 Jul 2022, 23:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Simple passage but a couple of tricky questions
1. Primary Purpose
C. accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.
The author has written this passage to explain why DB took this wavering position, a position that shifted from one side to another
Not to contest/challenge any view (D option)
2.B
Passage says: DB aligned himself with T, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts
3. C (POE)
A-We are not told abt anything abt contributions following the editorial. Just that people were surprised
B-Nowhere mentioned that contributions had the "same" effect
C- OK
D- Nothing abt Trotter's tactics
E- nothing about civil rights
4.D
Author says DB shifted his positions and then explains 2 scenarios - case where he supported Washington and another where he suppored Trotter
5. E (Tough one of the lot)
between D and E
Passage says: Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances...Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans(AA) in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
so DB knew that AA had made some advances/gains but when he learnt there was against discrimination during war, he asked AA to come back.
D: says DB recognized the discrimination , but asked AA to stop fighting for equality: Wrong (DB said "come back")
E: says DB knew that AA had made some gains, and so in the editorial he asked AA to stop fighting and proclaim solidarity : Correct
1. Primary Purpose
C. accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.
The author has written this passage to explain why DB took this wavering position, a position that shifted from one side to another
Not to contest/challenge any view (D option)
2.B
Passage says: DB aligned himself with T, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts
3. C (POE)
A-We are not told abt anything abt contributions following the editorial. Just that people were surprised
B-Nowhere mentioned that contributions had the "same" effect
C- OK
D- Nothing abt Trotter's tactics
E- nothing about civil rights
4.D
Author says DB shifted his positions and then explains 2 scenarios - case where he supported Washington and another where he suppored Trotter
5. E (Tough one of the lot)
between D and E
Passage says: Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances...Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans(AA) in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
so DB knew that AA had made some advances/gains but when he learnt there was against discrimination during war, he asked AA to come back.
D: says DB recognized the discrimination , but asked AA to stop fighting for equality: Wrong (DB said "come back")
E: says DB knew that AA had made some gains, and so in the editorial he asked AA to stop fighting and proclaim solidarity : Correct
