Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 05:47 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 05:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 (Medium)|   Short Passage|   Social Science|                     
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 294
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,447
Own Kudos:
79,444
 [3]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,447
Kudos: 79,444
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,447
Own Kudos:
79,444
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,447
Kudos: 79,444
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kushchokhani
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Apr 2024
Posts: 508
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Posts: 508
Kudos: 654
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
tejyr
Anyone pls explain how Q4(The author of the passage refers to Washington call ... In order to) the answer is d.
I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)

Posted from my mobile device
The OA is in fact (D), as listed in the 2017 Verbal review (question #77).

Quote:
The editorial surprised many African Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter.
On one end of the spectrum, you have Washington, an accommodationist. On the other end, you have Trotter, a confrontationist. Rather than aligning himself with either side consistently, "Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter."

Du Bois was often viewed as a "chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington." However, in some instances, he would be on Washington's side. For example, Du Bois supported Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. This is evidence that Du Bois would shift his political views rather than firmly aligning himself with either side.

(A) is wrong because Du Bois did not have a "characteristic position on the continuum between accommodationism and confrontationism." The call to African Americans in 1895 does not show that Du Bois regularly aligned himself with accommodationism. Rather, it showed that he was willing to SHIFT his position along the continuum.

(D) is the best answer.

GMATNinja

I am still confused between A and D.

By characteristic position, I understand that because Du Bois kept on shifting his position, it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism depending upon the situation (but not both together at any particular point in time). So any answer choice pointing out any one of the 2 positions may be the correct answer for the 1895 sentence purpose per se.

I marked A because the question asks purpose of Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. I would have marked D if the question would have asked the purpose of 1903 sentence because there is a contrasting word "however" in this sentence which actually indicates the tendency to shift political positions. On the contrary, 1895 sentence actually plays the role of introducing his fluctuating (shifting) characteristic position as accommodationism basis the situation in that year (it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism as he keeps on shifting)- what option A states. Then in 1903, he shifted his characteristic position- what option D states.

I understand the OA is D so we cannot challenge the same. However, the explanation is not satisfactory basis my above contention. Hope you could provide some better explanation.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,829
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 4


Kushchokhani
GMATNinja
tejyr
Anyone pls explain how Q4(The author of the passage refers to Washington call ... In order to) the answer is d.
I am getting option a (also same(...continuum...) is included in passage just before mentioning Washington's call and also in og solution also same mentioned for a)

Posted from my mobile device
The OA is in fact (D), as listed in the 2017 Verbal review (question #77).

Quote:
The editorial surprised many African Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter.
On one end of the spectrum, you have Washington, an accommodationist. On the other end, you have Trotter, a confrontationist. Rather than aligning himself with either side consistently, "Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter."

Du Bois was often viewed as a "chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker T.Washington." However, in some instances, he would be on Washington's side. For example, Du Bois supported Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. This is evidence that Du Bois would shift his political views rather than firmly aligning himself with either side.

(A) is wrong because Du Bois did not have a "characteristic position on the continuum between accommodationism and confrontationism." The call to African Americans in 1895 does not show that Du Bois regularly aligned himself with accommodationism. Rather, it showed that he was willing to SHIFT his position along the continuum.

(D) is the best answer.

GMATNinja

I am still confused between A and D.

By characteristic position, I understand that because Du Bois kept on shifting his position, it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism depending upon the situation (but not both together at any particular point in time). So any answer choice pointing out any one of the 2 positions may be the correct answer for the 1895 sentence purpose per se.

I marked A because the question asks purpose of Washington's call to African Americans in 1895. I would have marked D if the question would have asked the purpose of 1903 sentence because there is a contrasting word "however" in this sentence which actually indicates the tendency to shift political positions. On the contrary, 1895 sentence actually plays the role of introducing his fluctuating (shifting) characteristic position as accommodationism basis the situation in that year (it can be either accommodationism or confrontationism as he keeps on shifting)- what option A states. Then in 1903, he shifted his characteristic position- what option D states.

I understand the OA is D so we cannot challenge the same. However, the explanation is not satisfactory basis my above contention. Hope you could provide some better explanation.
If a person has a "characteristic position," you'd expect that person to consistently take that position. For instance, if someone is a diehard Denver Broncos fan, their "characteristic position" would be pro-Broncos. If someone cheered for a different team every year, you wouldn't say that they had a "characteristic position" of cheering for any one team -- instead, they are characterized by the fact that they keep changing their position.

Similarly, you wouldn't say that Du Bois held a "characteristic position" of supporting Washington in 1895 or supporting Trotter in 1903 -- that's way too narrow to be characteristic. Du Bois' only characteristic position is that he DIDN'T consistently pick a side.

So, why did the author discuss Washington's call to African Americans in 1895? Think about the structure of the first paragraph to answer that question:

  • First, the author introduces a position: Du Bois' accommodationist message during WWI.
  • Then, the author states that this position surprised people who saw Du Bois as confrontationist.
  • Then, the author makes his/her argument: it should NOT be surprising, because Du Bois "often" shifted positions.
  • Finally, the author includes two examples as evidence for this argument.

From this, it's clear that the author's purpose is to support the argument that Du Bois often shifted positions. That's what we're looking for in an answer choice. We find it in (D), and you can eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
a123bansal
Joined: 02 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 24
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinjaTwo GMATNinja KarishmaB AndrewN
Please help me Experts

Can you please explain Q.5 in detail? Also what "in part" means in the E option?

I have already gone through all comments but didn't get a thorough explanation of Q.5.

By the way below is my reasoning for Q.5? Please Please check this also
A) We don't know What Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past hence wrong
B) Passage doesn't mention the views of trotter hence we can't conclude from this option. Wrong
C) Passage doesn't mention the long terms goals of Du Bois explicitly hence wrong
D) I marked this correct (Reason: After seeing the discrimination, he suggested that strategy i.e. to proclaim their solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. )
E) I marked this wrong because I thought advocate means suggest hence option is saying: Strategy was suggested by Du Bois in part, which means some part of the strategy is suggested by Du Bois but that's not the case full strategy is suggested by Du bois hence wrong

Thank You
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,829
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 5


a123bansal
Hi GMATNinjaTwo GMATNinja KarishmaB AndrewN
Please help me Experts

Can you please explain Q.5 in detail? Also what "in part" means in the E option?

I have already gone through all comments but didn't get a thorough explanation of Q.5.

By the way below is my reasoning for Q.5? Please Please check this also
A) We don't know What Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past hence wrong
B) Passage doesn't mention the views of trotter hence we can't conclude from this option. Wrong
C) Passage doesn't mention the long terms goals of Du Bois explicitly hence wrong
D) I marked this correct (Reason: After seeing the discrimination, he suggested that strategy i.e. to proclaim their solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. )
E) I marked this wrong because I thought advocate means suggest hence option is saying: Strategy was suggested by Du Bois in part, which means some part of the strategy is suggested by Du Bois but that's not the case full strategy is suggested by Du bois hence wrong

Thank You
Question 5 asks about "the strategy that Du Bois's 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War."

That strategy was to "stop agitating for equality and to proclaim [...] solidarity with White Americans."

Why did Du Bois argue for this strategy? We learn of two reasons in the second paragraph:

    1) "government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances."
    2) "Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances."

Here's (D):
Quote:
D. It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.
Discrimination is mentioned in the last sentence of the passage, and it actually led Du Bois to reverse his 1918 position. When he learned that African Americans faced discrimination in the military, he went back to a more confrontational approach.

So, Du Bois definitely didn't come up with his 1918 strategy in response to discrimination. This discrimination actually led to the END of the 1918 strategy.

(D) is out for question 5.

Here's (E):
Quote:
E. It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
This fits nicely with the second reason listed above! Du Bois "believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances."

The "in part" doesn't mean that it only accounts for part of the strategy. It just means that it's not the only reason that Du Bois had to advocate for the strategy.

The other reason is the first one listed above: "government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances." So, the "in part" bit fits with the info in the passage.

(E) is the correct answer to question 5.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
JulieLama
Joined: 18 Jun 2020
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja karishma B Can you please help to clarify what is the problem in option A in
Q2. The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois's attitude toward Washington ?

A. It underwent a shift during the First World War as Du Bois became more sympathetic with Trotter's views.

B. It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois's disagreement with Washington's accommodationist views.

C. It underwent a shift as Du Bois made a long-term commitment to the strategy of accommodation.

D. It remained consistently positive even though Du Bois disagreed with Washington's efforts to control the African American press.

E. It was shaped primarily by Du Bois's appreciation of Washington's pragmatic approach to the advancement of the interests of African Americans.


The question asks about DB 's atitude towards Washington . With POE I could eliminate C, D ,E but stuck between A nd B . I feel option A is very close to option B . Option A states that DB's attitude underwent a shift as DB became sympathetic towards Trotters's views viz. DB agreed to Trotter's point that Washington is trying to silence African Americans. I don't understand how can I eliminate A and confidently go for option B.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 2


JulieLama
url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=karishma]karishma[/url] B Can you please help to clarify what is the problem in option A in
Q2. The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois's attitude toward Washington ?

A. It underwent a shift during the First World War as Du Bois became more sympathetic with Trotter's views.

B. It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois's disagreement with Washington's accommodationist views.

C. It underwent a shift as Du Bois made a long-term commitment to the strategy of accommodation.

D. It remained consistently positive even though Du Bois disagreed with Washington's efforts to control the African American press.

E. It was shaped primarily by Du Bois's appreciation of Washington's pragmatic approach to the advancement of the interests of African Americans.

The question asks about DB 's atitude towards Washington . With POE I could eliminate C, D ,E but stuck between A nd B . I feel option A is very close to option B . Option A states that DB's attitude underwent a shift as DB became sympathetic towards Trotters's views viz. DB agreed to Trotter's point that Washington is trying to silence African Americans. I don't understand how can I eliminate A and confidently go for option B.
There are some major differences between answer choices (A) and (B) for question 2.

Answer choice (A) talks about a shift during WWI, when DuBois wrote his 1918 editorial. (B), on the other hand, talks about a shift in 1903.

We can eliminate (A) because DuBois didn't become more sympathetic to Trotter's views during WWI. DuBois aligned himself with Trotter in 1903 in order to stand up against Booker's censorship. During WWI DuBois actually shifted away from Trotter's point of view to a more accommodationist stance.

(A) is out for question 2.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
JulieLama
Joined: 18 Jun 2020
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja Thanks for the reply . Now I can understand the difference between Option A and B but still wanted to confirm the part where you have mentioned " During WWI DuBois actually shifted away from Trotter's point of view to a more accommodationist stance" . Let me summarize what I understood on reading the passage .

-> DB often shifted positions between accommodationist and confrontationist views . So in 1903 i.e prior to WW1 he aligned with Trotter 's views (confrontationist ) because trotter had described to him about Washington's efforts to silence Africans etc.
-> Again in 1918 that is when he wrote the editorial he advised to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim their solidarity for WW1. This is accomodationist view (as this view aligns with that of Washington's) .
-> But this accommodationist view did not last long as he learnt about the systematic discrimination experienced by Africans . So in 1918 he aligned with accommodationist and sometime later in the same year he called those Africans back from fight ? Is my understanding correct ? In 1918 he shifted his views twice . So in 1918 i.e during the WW1 even though he shifted away from Trotter's views to accommodationst stance , he could not stick to it .

Please let me know if I have any gap in my understanding . Thanks in advance !
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,829
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JulieLama
url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url] Thanks for the reply . Now I can understand the difference between Option A and B but still wanted to confirm the part where you have mentioned " During WWI DuBois actually shifted away from Trotter's point of view to a more accommodationist stance" . Let me summarize what I understood on reading the passage .

-> DB often shifted positions between accommodationist and confrontationist views . So in 1903 i.e prior to WW1 he aligned with Trotter 's views (confrontationist ) because trotter had described to him about Washington's efforts to silence Africans etc.
-> Again in 1918 that is when he wrote the editorial he advised to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim their solidarity for WW1. This is accomodationist view (as this view aligns with that of Washington's) .
-> But this accommodationist view did not last long as he learnt about the systematic discrimination experienced by Africans . So in 1918 he aligned with accommodationist and sometime later in the same year he called those Africans back from fight ? Is my understanding correct ? In 1918 he shifted his views twice . So in 1918 i.e during the WW1 even though he shifted away from Trotter's views to accommodationst stance , he could not stick to it .

Please let me know if I have any gap in my understanding . Thanks in advance !
Overall, that's a pretty good summary -- DuBois switched his stance several times.

One note is that he didn't exactly "call those African [Americans] back from the fight." Instead, the passage tells us that he "called on them to 'return fighting' from the war." This means that he wanted soldiers, upon their return at the end of WWI, to engage in the fight against discrimination in the United States.

DuBois didn't have any power to actually bring anyone home -- he just wanted soldiers who were already on their way home to join him in his continued fight against discrimination.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Apr 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 176
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain Q5 - B option ?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,829
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 5


nikitathegreat
Can someone explain Q5 - B option ?
Question 5 asks about "the strategy that Du Bois's 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War."

That strategy was to "stop agitating for equality and to proclaim [...] solidarity with White Americans."

Why did Du Bois argue for this strategy? We learn of two reasons in the second paragraph:

    "government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances."

    "Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances."

Here's (B):

Quote:
B. It represented a compromise between Du Bois's own views and those of Trotter.
A "compromise" is a middle ground between two opposing views. One problem with this is that DuBois didn't have a consistent view -- his views changed with circumstances. So, we can't really say that there were two opposing views to begin with.

Additionally, DuBois's strategy to "stop agitating for equality" definitely did NOT meet Trotter halfway. Trotter was a "confrontationist" who would entirely oppose Du Bois's strategy.

For these reasons, (B) is out for question 5.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Kimberly77
Joined: 16 Nov 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2024
Posts: 421
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,898
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Posts: 421
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Question 5


a123bansal
Hi GMATNinjaTwo GMATNinja KarishmaB AndrewN
Please help me Experts

Can you please explain Q.5 in detail? Also what "in part" means in the E option?

I have already gone through all comments but didn't get a thorough explanation of Q.5.

By the way below is my reasoning for Q.5? Please Please check this also
A) We don't know What Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past hence wrong
B) Passage doesn't mention the views of trotter hence we can't conclude from this option. Wrong
C) Passage doesn't mention the long terms goals of Du Bois explicitly hence wrong
D) I marked this correct (Reason: After seeing the discrimination, he suggested that strategy i.e. to proclaim their solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. )
E) I marked this wrong because I thought advocate means suggest hence option is saying: Strategy was suggested by Du Bois in part, which means some part of the strategy is suggested by Du Bois but that's not the case full strategy is suggested by Du bois hence wrong

Thank You
Question 5 asks about "the strategy that Du Bois's 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War."

That strategy was to "stop agitating for equality and to proclaim [...] solidarity with White Americans."

Why did Du Bois argue for this strategy? We learn of two reasons in the second paragraph:

    1) "government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances."
    2) "Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances."

Here's (D):
Quote:
D. It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.
Discrimination is mentioned in the last sentence of the passage, and it actually led Du Bois to reverse his 1918 position. When he learned that African Americans faced discrimination in the military, he went back to a more confrontational approach.

So, Du Bois definitely didn't come up with his 1918 strategy in response to discrimination. This discrimination actually led to the END of the 1918 strategy.

(D) is out for question 5.

Here's (E):
Quote:
E. It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
This fits nicely with the second reason listed above! Du Bois "believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances."

The "in part" doesn't mean that it only accounts for part of the strategy. It just means that it's not the only reason that Du Bois had to advocate for the strategy.

The other reason is the first one listed above: "government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances." So, the "in part" bit fits with the info in the passage.

(E) is the correct answer to question 5.

I hope that helps!

Great explanation GMATNinja
One question regarding below line, last sentence in the paragraph stated he called on them to “return fighting” from the war. Isn't this response to 1918 strategy as a result of discrimination? So not sure how it led to the end of 1918 strategy? Could you help clarify? Thanks

So, Du Bois definitely didn't come up with his 1918 strategy in response to discrimination. This discrimination actually led to the END of the 1918 strategy.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,829
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,829
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kimberly77

Great explanation [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D
One question regarding below line, last sentence in the paragraph stated he called on them to “return fighting” from the war. Isn't this response to 1918 strategy as a result of discrimination? So not sure how it led to the end of 1918 strategy? Could you help clarify? Thanks

So, Du Bois definitely didn't come up with his 1918 strategy in response to discrimination. This discrimination actually led to the END of the 1918 strategy.
Good question! You're right.

But the line you referenced at the end of the last paragraph isn't what we're asked about in Q5. The question refers to the stance Du Bois expressed in his 1918 editorial, namely, "to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim their solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War." So in the editorial, he's advocating solidarity.

In the last paragraph, we get the line "Du Bois’s accommodationism did not last, however." So this appears to be an evolution in his thinking that occurred sometime after the editorial. Put another way, he was an advocate of accommodation in his editorial, but later, after hearing about all the discrimination Black soldier endured in the wary, he changed his position. Because we're asked specifically about his position in the editorial, this change isn't relevant in the question.

All to say: you're right about the sequence of events. They just don't impact the answer to this question.

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
509 posts
363 posts