In a recent year California produced an orange crop equal to only seve

carcass so correct me if I am wrong, does it means that when we are comparing a single orange we are talking about the size of orange. But when we are comparing citrus fruits as a group, we are comparing quantity.

The production of California' oranges is 76 and that of Florida's is 100 units (just to give an example )

However, the TOTAL citrus production of Florida (the citrus included are lemons, oranges, bergamot, cedar and so forth) is 1000 pieces and Florida TOTAL crops production is 23 % LESS than California's.

So if Florida has a total production of 1000 of citrus-like fruits, California has 1298 (approximately, because its production is 23% MORE than that of Florida)

C = 1298 - 76= 1222

F = 1000 - 100 = 900

C > F : 1222 > 900

D is the answer

(B) Florida produced larger oranges than California did.

carcass Thanks. Appreciate your time & effort.

kudos if it was useful to you.

regards

With Inference based CR questions, and those which include numbers/comparisons in particular, the GMAT tries to confuse the taker with its use of language. However, the most important rule to remember is that the answer you pick MUST be true, 100% of the time. What this means is that if it's even possible that the statement is false, we must eliminate it.

All we know is that CA's orange crop is smaller than FL's, but their overall citrus crops (of which oranges are a part) are greater than FLs. Note that we know nothing about what it means to be smaller or bigger (Is it by volume? Weight? Fruit size?), just that by whatever definition has been chosen, these are the comparisons.

Hence, the only thing we can really conclude from it is that CA's non orange citrus crop is 'bigger' than FL's.

Option A - This is such an extreme claim. Remember that we're looking to see if it's merely possible that the statement is false. Florida could have grown anything else, we have no info that says they could not. OUT

Option B - This is the trap answer. We don't actually have any info on orange size. FL's oranges could be bigger, but they could very well be smaller too, just with more bulk. The only info we have is 'overall crop size'. OUT

Option C - We have no info on the raw numbers of anything produced. It could be that CA produced mostly oranges, or that they did not. Its possible that this statement is false and can hence be rejected. OUT

Option D - At first glance it may seem like we don't have the necessary info. However, we can actually compare the ratios mentioned. If we take non orange citrus in CA to be p and oranges in CA to be q, we find that we're comparing p/q to less than p/more than q. The proportion of non-orange citrus in CA is therefore clearly greater. In fact, its not possible for the statement to be false, no matter what combinations we try. CORRECT

Option E - Who cares about agriculture as a whole? We are only focused on citrus crops, specifically oranges vs non-oranges. This option is irrelevant. OUT

The right answer is therefore D.

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.