Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 17:24 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 17:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 488 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1539 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 488 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1539 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
I'd be happy if someone can give me a rule on this also. I actually considered the 2 cases you mentioned and I get the exact opposite answer to mine. I quickly tested it by plugging in numbers and invalidated it as wrong.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
|x+2| > |3x-5|


the check points are x=-2 and x=5/3

----------|-----------|-----------
-2 5/3

Case 1 : x <-2

-(x+2 ) > - (3x-5)
or x > 7/2 (not a good value)

Case 2 : x =-2

0 > -(3x-5) or x > 5/3 (not a good value)

Case 3 : -2<x<5/3

x+2 > -(3x-5)

x > 3/4

case 4 : x = 5/3

x+2 > 0 or x > - 2

case 5 : x > 5/3

x+2 > 3x -5

or x < 7/2



so combining all the above the solution is

3/4 < x < 5/3, x = 5/3 , 5/3< x < 7/2

or

3/4 < x < 7/2
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
In case 3, shouldn't the negative sign be on the left-hand side rather than on the right-hand side?
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
Quote:
Case 3 : -2<x<5/3

x+2 > -(3x-5)

x > 3/4


In this case x is greater than -2 , for example -1, so x+2 will always be positive. The other side will always be negative (3*-1 - 5 = -8). So the modulus to be positive the negative sign will be for 3x-5.

Let me know if this answers your question.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 159 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
The other approach when dealing with Mod on both sides of the inequality is to square both sides - one way to remove the mod. Mod is +ve and its square is +ve for sure too...thereby avoiding multiple cases to consider. This is a good rule when dealing with Mod when both sides have linear functions on both sides.

Looking at the problem under discussion, it would mean..

(x+2)^2 > (3x-5)^2

=> x^2 +4 + 4x > 9x^2 + 25 - 30x
=> -8x^2 + 34x - 21 > 0
=> (-2x+7)*(4x-3) > 0

=> x<7/2 and x> 3/4
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Na
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
Venksune,

Thank you for reflecting this method.This is indeed an easier method to solve such problems.I have a quick question on the calculation:
x^2 +4 + 4x > 9x^2 + 25 - 30x
==> 8x^2 - 34x + 21 < 0
==> (2x-7)*(4x-3) < 0

Reflecting the above in a number line,I see the following:

<----------------------------------|
<----------|
0--------(3/4)-------------------(7/2)--------------


The intersecting section is when x<3/4. Thus would that not be the answer. But when I plug in 1/4, (2(1/4) - 7)*(4(1/4) -3) > 0
++++

I know I am missing something?Can you assist on this.Rgds,

Anna

venksune wrote:
The other approach when dealing with Mod on both sides of the inequality is to square both sides - one way to remove the mod. Mod is +ve and its square is +ve for sure too...thereby avoiding multiple cases to consider. This is a good rule when dealing with Mod when both sides have linear functions on both sides.

Looking at the problem under discussion, it would mean..

(x+2)^2 > (3x-5)^2

=> x^2 +4 + 4x > 9x^2 + 25 - 30x
=> -8x^2 + 34x - 21 > 0
=> (-2x+7)*(4x-3) > 0

=> x<7/2 and x> 3/4
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 521 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
Hi, the only comment I would like to make is that it took me a real long time to factor the quadratic equation below. I used the quadratic formula. Is there an easier way to achieve this? If not, then this method may take longer then the one described earlier.

x^2 +4 + 4x > 9x^2 + 25 - 30x
==> 8x^2 - 34x + 21 (2x-7)*(4x-3) < 0



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Inequality problem [#permalink]
Moderator:
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne