Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 17:36 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 17:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,234
Own Kudos:
45,047
 [17]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,234
Kudos: 45,047
 [17]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,478
 [5]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,478
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
deepthit
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 Apr 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 129
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 104
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Sumo23
Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Last visit: 26 Apr 2018
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A... if x<|x| it would mean that x is a negative integer... going into the options with this premise, option A suggests that x < 2x; this is only possible when x is negative... Sufficient

Option 2 mentions x is non-positive which can be negative OR zero... not unique hence not sufficient...

Sent from my GT-I9060I using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
NandishSS
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 28 Jan 2021
Posts: 700
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 700
Kudos: 1,789
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
chetan2u
Is x < |x|?

(1) x > 2x
(2) x is non-positive integer


Great question, chetan2u!

Target question: Is x < |x|?
This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question.

To see what I mean, let's examine 3 possible scenarios: x is negative, x is positive and x is zero

Scenario #1: x is negative
If x is negative, then |x| is positive. So, we get x < |x|, since x is negative and |x| is positive.
For example, if x = -2, then we have -2 < |-2|

Scenario #2: x is positive
If x is positive, then x and |x| are BOTH positive. In fact, x = |x|
For example, if x = 3, then we have 3 = |3|

Scenario #3: x is zero
Since |0| = 0, then we have the case where x = |x|


So, the ONLY time that x < |x| is when x is negative.
So, asking Is x < |x|? is the SAME as asking, Is x negative?
This means we can REPHRASE the target question....

REPHRASED target question: Is x negative?

Now onto the statements.....

Statement 1: x > 2x
Subtract x from both sides to get: 0 > x
In other words, x is negative. PERFECT!
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x is non-positive integer
If x is NOT POSITIVE, then x can be negative OR x can equal 0
In other words, x may or may not be negative.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

RELATED VIDEOS FROM OUR COURSE



What a great Explanation Brent!!! :clap: :-D
avatar
T700ISB
Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Last visit: 22 Aug 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 264
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
Posts: 32
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
chetan2u
Is x < |x|?

(1) x > 2x
(2) x is non-positive integer


Great question, chetan2u!

Target question: Is x < |x|?
This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question.

To see what I mean, let's examine 3 possible scenarios: x is negative, x is positive and x is zero

Scenario #1: x is negative
If x is negative, then |x| is positive. So, we get x < |x|, since x is negative and |x| is positive.
For example, if x = -2, then we have -2 < |-2|

Scenario #2: x is positive
If x is positive, then x and |x| are BOTH positive. In fact, x = |x|
For example, if x = 3, then we have 3 = |3|

Scenario #3: x is zero
Since |0| = 0, then we have the case where x = |x|


So, the ONLY time that x < |x| is when x is negative.
So, asking Is x < |x|? is the SAME as asking, Is x negative?
This means we can REPHRASE the target question....

REPHRASED target question: Is x negative?

Now onto the statements.....

Statement 1: x > 2x
Subtract x from both sides to get: 0 > x
In other words, x is negative. PERFECT!
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x is non-positive integer
If x is NOT POSITIVE, then x can be negative OR x can equal 0
In other words, x may or may not be negative.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

RELATED VIDEOS FROM OUR COURSE


\


Thanks for the Crystal Clear explanation !!
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,996
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,996
Kudos: 1,120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109975 posts
498 posts
212 posts