Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 03:52 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 03:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 214
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Maine will face a serious shortage of timber by the year 2000, the res [#permalink]
A lot of the confusion here is due to the OP's typo ("that" instead of "the" REALLY changes the sentence) and the posting of the incorrect answer. The full sentence will be, when correct:

Maine will face a serious shortage of timber by the year 2000, the result of a major infestation of spruce budworm, the coming to maturity of much of Maine's spruce and fir forests and a rapid expansion of the paper business.

This sounds fine and works well with parallelism, which is what this question is really testing.

the result of
- a major infestation of spruce budworm
- the coming to maturity of much of Maine's spruce and fir forests and
- a rapid expansion of the paper business

As I'm sure many people using this forum know, the word "much" is used with uncountable things, such as water and sugar. So why can we say "much of the forests"?

It's idiomatic to say "forests" this way, though quite old fashioned. "The forests of Maine are huge and full of owls." But we're not talking about countable numbers of individual forests, like, "there are 117 forests." We're using "forests" to describe something vast and uncountable. It's quite similar to the way we sometimes say "the waters of the Pacific" even though water isn't a countable noun.

This is old-fashioned, almost poetic phrasing in an old fashioned question, which is why you won't find it in any official guide from the last 25 years or so! Unless you're being held captive by an evil gang and your only way out is to get every old SC question right for the next two years, I wouldn't worry about this one.

Also, given that there isn't an option with "many" in it, you can just relax and worry about something else to help you pick your answer. Rather than obsessively proving that your answer is perfect as a diamond, prove that it's the best option of the five, or rather, that it's the least awful one of the five.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Maine will face a serious shortage of timber by the year 2000, the res [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Maine will face a serious shortage of timber by the year 2000, the res [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne