Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 01:30 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 01:30

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4560 [20]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [6]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [5]
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 325
Own Kudos [?]: 1664 [2]
Given Kudos: 348
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakn [#permalink]
2
Kudos
B VS C

They're very similar ideas: the company is going to develop problems in the future unless we change things now, and the point that if we don't do this, it's irresponsible.

But the manager isn't just making the first point. The manager's point in making this whole argument is that if we DON'T do this, it's actually irresponsible. (See the whole last half where he talks about the reckless financial planner as an analogy.) If he just wanted to make the point in the first sentence, he wouldn't have gone into all of the detail about what reckless behavior is.

This supports (B)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2017
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 359 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE:Programming (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Safe Conclusion is B. Option C goes too extreme.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 May 2018
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hard choice between B and C. I would go with C, because the term "long time" is quite flexible. "Develop significant weaknesses" is already mentioned in the statement and reflects the overall conclusion accurately.

(B) It would be irresponsible to postpone changes to the vendor contracts just because the supply chain will not develop weaknesses for a long time.
(C) lf no changes are made to the vendor contracts, the supply chain will eventually develop significant weaknesses.
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4690 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
1
Kudos
pkshankar wrote:
This is a main point question. The correct answer will be the one which the author is trying to convince you with.
The only debatable answer are 'B' and 'C'. The conclusion of the argument is 'But this is an irresponsible approach', now what is an irresponsible approach, the act of delaying. The author lays emphasis on this point by citing an example.
Even though option C is factually correct IMHO, but is not the main point.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

I second you for the explanation, answer must be (B)...
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Akela wrote:
Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weaknesses unless we make changes to our vendor contracts now. Some will argue that this problem is so far in the future that there is no need to address it today. But that is an irresponsible approach. Just imagine if a financial planner offered the same counsel to a 30-year-old client: "Don't worry, Jane, retirement is 35 years away; you don't need to save anything now." That planner would be guilty of gross malpractice.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the manager's argument?

(A) Some people argue that the supply-chain problem is so far in the future that there is no need to address it now.
(B) It would be irresponsible to postpone changes to the vendor contracts just because the supply chain will not develop weaknesses for a long time.
(C) lf no changes are made to the vendor contracts, the supply chain will eventually develop significant weaknesses.
(D) In planning to meet its future obligations, a company should follow the same practices that are approptiate for an individual who is planning for retirement.
(E) Financial planners should advise their clients to save money for retirement only if retirement is many years away.

Source: LSAT



Clever question
Between B and C , we have to be careful with the words in both B and C.
Argument is talking about postponement of changes.
B also talks about postponement of changes in vendor contract
, but C is talking about "NO CHANGES in vendor contract"
this difference in wording changes our Answer choice , CORRECT Answer is B
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2554
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
1
Kudos
akela wrote:
Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weaknesses unless we make changes to our vendor contracts now. Some will argue that this problem is so far in the future that there is no need to address it today. But that is an irresponsible approach. Just imagine if a financial planner offered the same counsel to a 30-year-old client: "Don't worry, Jane, retirement is 35 years away; you don't need to save anything now." That planner would be guilty of gross malpractice.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the manager's argument?

(A) Some people argue that the supply-chain problem is so far in the future that there is no need to address it now.
(B) It would be irresponsible to postpone changes to the vendor contracts just because the supply chain will not develop weaknesses for a long time.
(C) lf no changes are made to the vendor contracts, the supply chain will eventually develop significant weaknesses.
(D) In planning to meet its future obligations, a company should follow the same practices that are approptiate for an individual who is planning for retirement.
(E) Financial planners should advise their clients to save money for retirement only if retirement is many years away.

Source: LSAT

B and C are contenders.
C just does the typical LSAT/GMAT's trick - reversal.

Is A ----> B similar to Not B ----> Not A ??
Not necessarily.

Choosing C suggests one took only one point of view into consideration wherein there's also a possibility on the opposite side.
Yes, "long time" did look weird and odd, but isn't 35 years a long time.

Answer B.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2020
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Sustainability
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
daagh @GmatNinjas- Can you please clarify? I feel that since C is just a restatement from the passage, it can't be the conclusion since a conclusion has to implicit and not explicit, therefore C can't be the answer.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7628 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
gauri123456 wrote:
daagh @GmatNinjas- Can you please clarify? I feel that since C is just a restatement from the passage, it can't be the conclusion since a conclusion has to implicit and not explicit, therefore C can't be the answer.


Hi Gauri

Let me try to address your query.

A stimulus in a Critical Reasoning question (typically one that is assumption based) consists of two parts:

a) Premises or facts that are presented. These may be one or more in number.
b) A conclusion that is derived from the given premises. This is always exactly one.

In other words, the reasons for drawing the conclusion are the premises. The above two are always explicitly mentioned in the stimulus and are never to be questioned. There are other facets which link the premises to the conclusions - these are called assumptions. These are never mentioned in the stimulus and are to be logically deduced.

Depending on the question, you may also be required to find an inference from the facts given in the stimulus. An inference is also never mentioned explicitly in the passage.

Hope this helps to clarify.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2019
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
Can someone explain the reasoning to eliminate choice D?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2022
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
harsh61998 wrote:
Can someone explain the reasoning to eliminate choice D?

Posted from my mobile device


I chose B but couldn't understand why to eliminate D.
Just because "B" was more specific in a sense than "D" was my reason to choose "B".
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Posts: 209
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
I didn't choose option B because of inclusion of phrase "long time". In the stem, no where the time period have been mentioned for beginning the weakness.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2020
Posts: 185
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 2218
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Send PM
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
Why B is preferred over C? Some experts please guide me here.

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Manager: This company's supply chain will develop significant weakness [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne