Hi guys,
I have been a fan of this forum for a while, appreciate all the helpful guidance that has been provided.
I have been going crazy on GMAT quant for the past month and hit a major wall today after my fourth
MGMAT CAT. I was shocked to see that my Quant score had not progressed from the first CAT I took last month after a fair amount of study. I decided to do a deeper analysis on my results - thankfully it looks as though I have progressed as per the table below based on the increase in the difficulty of the questions:
CAT 1 (Q. 39)
Score Range
300 - 400
400 - 500
500 - 600 (11 out of 14 correct, 78%)
600 - 700 (6 out of 17 correct, 35%)
700 - 800 (1 out of 16 correct, 16%)
CAT 2 (Q. 37)
Score Range
300 - 400
400 - 500
500 - 600 (10 out of 14 correct, 72%)
600 - 700 (7 out of 21 correct, 33%)
700 - 800 (0 out of 2 correct, 0%)
CAT 3 (Q. 43)
Score Range
300 - 400 (1 out of 1 correct, 100%)
400 - 500
500 - 600 (14 out of 15 correct, 93%)
600 - 700 (6 out of 18 correct, 33%)
700 - 800 (0 out of 3 correct, 0%)
CAT 4 (Q. 39)
Score Range
300 - 400
400 - 500 (2 out of 2 correct, 100%)
500 - 600 (4 out of 6 correct, 67%)
600 - 700 (8 out of 17 correct, 47%)
700 - 800 (3 out of 12 correct, 25%)
From looking at the data, I am getting harder questions and getting more harder questions right however due to scoring less correct answers in total it seems as though my overall quant score is being pulled down.
I just have two questions:
- Is this the correct way to interpret data from third party tests such as Manhattan and is this calculation method a source of the difference between third party tests and the GMAT exam? Will the real GMAT calculate differently?
- In your experience, would the real GMAT keep on sending 700+ level questions until you cannot answer anymore? I hear varying reports on this with some stating that they only send a few very hard questions for even high level scorers. In my most recent CAT those difficult questions killed my time management!
Thank you for your feedback in advance!
Nate