GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 23 May 2018, 00:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Many major scientific discoveries of the past were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 86
Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2017, 04:21
4
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:00) correct 42% (02:08) wrong based on 523 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

(B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research.

(C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer.

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply.

(E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Posts: 86
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2017, 04:28
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
PREMISE :- Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research.

Conclusion:- Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.



(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

(B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research.

(C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer.

out of scope

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply.


(E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity
too vague statement
_________________

Hit kudos if you like my post

Today's preparation determines tomorrow's achievement.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 23
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Insead Sept'18
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.25
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2017, 07:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Premise 1: In the past, many discoveries came from serendipity (fortune, accident)
Premise 2: However, now, research is so costly -> depend (heavily) on grants
Premise 3: Such grants require clear outcome (findings) of research -> investigator ignore anything does not directly bear on funded research

Conclusion: serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery (findings)

Reasoning the argument: There is a gap between discovery (findings) and funded research --> It is possible that some findings (discovery) happen accidentally (not purposely sought) as the result of doing the research.

Negating A: Not only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research -> it means some findings are not purposely sought (accidentally) can direct bear on that research -> conclusion collapses

Hence, A is the correct answer.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3202
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2017, 12:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Aketa wrote:
hello experts?

could you please explain why B is wrong?


It seems that you have mistaken this question for an inference type question.

An assumption is a link between the premise and the conclusion.

I. Premise: such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research
II. Intermediate conclusion (i.e. conclusion of above premise and premise for final conclusion below): investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research.
III. Final conclusion: serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Option B does not link any of the premise-conclusion link ( i.e I to II or II to III). Hence it cannot be an assumption. It does not matter whether in past few researches, the investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research. Even if they didn't neither of the two links are affected.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 460
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2017, 09:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

(B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research.

(C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer.

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply.

(E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity

The argument says that unline earlier days investors now only funds the reaserch which is beneficial to them and the scientist now has to provide assurity that the reaserch would conclude with positive result which would be beneficial to the investors as well.Option A correctly mentions the arguments assumption.
TO test that weather option A is the correct choice we ccan do a negation test that is if we negate the assumption the argument shoud not be valid anymore,
So if we say that investors purposefully do not seek anything ,This would break the argument as the entire argument is based on this idea. threfore option A is the most suitable answer.

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3202
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2017, 11:10
gargisback wrote:
Subject: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were

sayantanc2k wrote:
Aketa wrote:
hello experts?

could you please explain why B is wrong?


It seems that you have mistaken this question for an inference type question.

An assumption is a link between the premise and the conclusion.

I. Premise: such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research
II. Intermediate conclusion (i.e. conclusion of above premise and premise for final conclusion below): investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research.
III. Final conclusion: serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Option B does not link any of the premise-conclusion link ( i.e I to II or II to III). Hence it cannot be an assumption. It does not matter whether in past few researches, the investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research. Even if they didn't neither of the two links are affected.


Why is A a right choice can u help???


Premise 1: Grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research
Premise 2: Investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research.

Conclusion: Serendipity (the occurrence of events by chance in a beneficial way) can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Option A: Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.
Negate option A: Findings that an investigator does NOT purposely seek can directly bear on that investigator's research.

The negation implies that even though the scientists do not intentionally seek certain things, they can still bear on that investigator's research (resulting in a discovery), implying that serendipity may play a role in scientific discovery (even though the scientists might not intend so). Thus negating option A breaks the argument and hence is a required assumption.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1002
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2018, 01:54
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research. --Correct.

(B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research. --Conclusion of the argument is regarding serendipity.

(C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer. --large funds not grants

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply. --Whether they receive or not doesn't refute the argument that serendipity can play a role in discovery.

(E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity --Exaggerated choice
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 92
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2018, 10:34
D is wrong because if you negate the answer choice, the argument can still hold

Argument : today's scientific discoveries are discovered not through luck but planning and focus...Hence luck is no longer essential in finding scientific discoveries

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply.

Negating D : Not all folks who apply for grant money, get some $

If D is accurate, negating D, destroy's the arguement

Now per negated D, if some one who applied for grant money did not get their grant money .... does it proove luck is no longer a factor in finding scientific discoveries ?

Per negated D, if some one who applied for grant money did not get their grant money (let's say one person is the sample size) -- can you proove definitely, luck is not longer important ..

You cant ...

Hence D cannot be correct
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2018, 10:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Many major scientific discoveries of the past were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.