GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jul 2018, 13:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 262
Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2012, 20:45
3
4
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (01:04) correct 29% (01:03) wrong based on 650 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause of bad breath is bacteria
build-up on the tongue. The research also concludes that tongue scrapers, when used
properly, can eliminate up to 40% of the bacteria from the tongue. As the effectiveness of
tongue scrapers becomes more widely known, the market for less effective breath freshening
products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly. Which of the following
provides the best evidence that the analyst’s argument is flawed?
A) Some breath freshening products are advertised to eliminate up to 30% of the bacteria from
the tongue.
b) Tongue scrapers have already been on the market for a number of years.
c) Many dentists recommend regular flossing, and not the use of the tongue scraper, to combat
d) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.
e) Some people buy breath freshening products for reasons other than to fight bad breath.

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 117
Location: India
Re: CR - Weaken - # 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2012, 19:26
4
1
This is a causal reasoning.

The argument says

Knowing the effectiveness of scrapper (cause) ---------> Decrease in sales of less effective breath freshening
products, such as mints, gums, and sprays (effect)

Option D points out the flaw by saying that "When Cause occured, the EFFECT DID NOT Occur"

Knowing the effectiveness of scrapper -----> more than 94% of the people continue to buy less effective breath freshening products and this says that sales will not decrease.
_________________

Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful.

Help me win "The One Thing You Wish You Knew - GMAT Club Contest"
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-one-thing-you-wish-you-knew-gmat-club-contest-140358.html#p1130989

##### General Discussion
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 197
Re: CR - Weaken - # 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2012, 10:49
d) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 66
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2013, 11:28
1
The market analyst concludes that the market for breath freshening products will
decline as the effectiveness of the tongue scraper becomes more widely known.
To show that this argument is flawed, we must attack one of two assumptions:
that consumers are primarily interested in products that are most effective in
fighting bad breath, or that consumers are currently unaware of the effectiveness
of the tongue scraper.
(A) This statement does not attack either one of the assumptions. In fact, it may
actually strengthen the argument by pointing out that some breath freshening
products are less effective than tongue scrapers at eliminating bacteria.
(B) This statement could weaken the argument by attacking the second
assumption (consumers are currently unaware of the tongue scraper). If the
tongue scraper has been on the market for a while, maybe consumers are
already aware of its effectiveness. However, just because the product is on the
market doesn't mean consumers are aware of its effectiveness. The analyst’s
conclusion states that as consumers learn about tongue scrapers, the market for
breath freshening products will decline, regardless of whether the tongue scraper
has already been on the market.
(C) While this certainly doesn’t help the market analyst’s case, we don’t know
what percentage of dentists recommend flossing over the tongue scraper, and
we can’t be sure how this recommendation affects the consumption of breath
freshening products.
(D) CORRECT. This statement weakens the argument by attacking one of the
main assumptions of the argument: people who use breath freshening products
don’t already know about the effectiveness of the tongue scraper. If 94% of those
scraper, and if these consumers have continued to purchase breath freshening
products, then only 6% of those who consume breath freshening products could
scrapers effectiveness in fighting bad breath. Even if all 6% stopped purchasing
the products, this would hardly create a “significant decline” in the market.
(E) This statement could weaken the argument by attacking the first assumption
(consumers are primarily interested in products that are most effective in fighting
bad breath). These particular consumers would not necessarily stop consuming
breath freshening products upon learning of a more effective product, such as
the tongue scraper. However, we have no information on what percentage of the
market these people represent.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 763
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 19:13
1
Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause of bad breath is bacteria
build-up on the tongue. The research also concludes that tongue scrapers, when used
properly, can eliminate up to 40% of the bacteria from the tongue. As the effectiveness of
tongue scrapers becomes more widely known, the market for less effective breath freshening
products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly. Which of the following
provides the best evidence that the analyst’s argument is flawed?
A) Some breath freshening products are advertised to eliminate up to 30% of the bacteria from
the tongue.
b) Tongue scrapers have already been on the market for a number of years.
c) Many dentists recommend regular flossing, and not the use of the tongue scraper, to combat
d) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.
e) Some people buy breath freshening products for reasons other than to fight bad breath.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3428
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 19:23
The question was already discussed here

market-analyst-recent-research-confirms-that-the-main-cause-131504.html
_________________
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 780
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 21:40
D it is : A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 121
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 21:57
As the effectiveness of tongue scrapers becomes more widely known, the market for less effective breath freshening products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly.
the argument assumes that
1: the basis of buying the breath freshening products is their effectiveness.
2:people are not aware of the effectiveness of tongue scrapers.
and option D addresses the same issue.
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 244
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2014, 07:23
GetThisDone wrote:
Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause of bad breath is bacteria
build-up on the tongue. The research also concludes that tongue scrapers, when used
properly, can eliminate up to 40% of the bacteria from the tongue. As the effectiveness of
tongue scrapers becomes more widely known, the market for less effective breath freshening
products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly. Which of the following
provides the best evidence that the analyst’s argument is flawed?
A) Some breath freshening products are advertised to eliminate up to 30% of the bacteria from
the tongue.
b) Tongue scrapers have already been on the market for a number of years.
c) Many dentists recommend regular flossing, and not the use of the tongue scraper, to combat
d) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.
e) Some people buy breath freshening products for reasons other than to fight bad breath.

Is the word " some " the deal breaker for option E ??
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 22
GPA: 3.55
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2014, 01:54
Conclusion: "As the effectiveness of tongue scrapers BECOMES MORE WIDELY KNOWN, the market for less effective breath freshening products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly

(D) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.

Because of the effectiveness of tongue scrapers BECOMES MORE WIDELY KNOWN to the extent that even those who currently DO NOT "regularly purchase breath freshening products" start to purchase tongue scrapers, the MARKET SHARE of tongue scrapers can significantly increase. By this, even if the number of consumers of breath freshening products remains constant, the market share of these products can decrease because of the new market entrants who are buying the tongue scrapers

The answer choice D only states that 94% of those who are REGULARLY PURCHASING are already aware of such effectiveness.

- this implies that D DOES NOT weaken the argument.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2074
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 22:18
tuanquang269 wrote:
Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause of bad breath is bacteria
build-up on the tongue. The research also concludes that tongue scrapers, when used
properly, can eliminate up to 40% of the bacteria from the tongue. As the effectiveness of
tongue scrapers becomes more widely known, the market for less effective breath freshening
products, such as mints, gums, and sprays, will decline significantly. Which of the following
provides the best evidence that the analyst’s argument is flawed?
A) Some breath freshening products are advertised to eliminate up to 30% of the bacteria from
the tongue.
b) Tongue scrapers have already been on the market for a number of years.
c) Many dentists recommend regular flossing, and not the use of the tongue scraper, to combat
d) A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products
are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.
e) Some people buy breath freshening products for reasons other than to fight bad breath.

The market analyst concludes that the market for breath freshening products will decline as the effectiveness of the tongue scraper becomes more widely known. To show that this argument is flawed, we must attack one of two assumptions :that consumers are primarily interested in products that are most effective in fighting bad breath, or that consumers are currently unaware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.

(A) This statement does not attack either one of the assumptions. In fact, it may actually strengthen the argument by pointing out that some breath freshening products are less effective than tongue scrapers at eliminating bacteria.
(B) This statement could weaken the argument by attacking the second assumption (consumers are currently unaware of the tongue scraper). If the tongue scraper has been on the market for a while, maybe consumers are already aware of its effectiveness. However, just because the product is on the market doesn't mean consumers are aware of its effectiveness. The analyst’s conclusion states that as consumers learn about tongue scrapers, the market for breath freshening products will decline, regardless of whether the tongue scraper has already been on the market.
(C) While this certainly doesn’t help the market analyst’s case, we don’t know what percentage of dentists recommend flossing over the tongue scraper, and we can’t be sure how this recommendation affects the consumption of breath freshening products.
(D) CORRECT. This statement weakens the argument by attacking one of the main assumptions of the argument: people who use breath freshening products don’t already know about the effectiveness of the tongue scraper. If 94% of those who consume breath freshening products already know about the tongue scraper, and if these consumers have continued to purchase breath freshening products, then only 6% of those who consume breath freshening products could decide to stop purchasing these products upon learning about the tongue scrapers effectiveness in fighting bad breath. Even if all 6% stopped purchasing the products, this would hardly create a “significant decline” in the market.
(E) This statement could weaken the argument by attacking the first assumption (consumers are primarily interested in products that are most effective in fighting bad breath). These particular consumers would not necessarily stop consuming breath freshening products upon learning of a more effective product, such as the tongue scraper. However, we have no information on what percentage of the market these people represent.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 664
Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2017, 12:49
Conclusion :- market for breath freshening products will decline as the effectiveness of the tongue scraper becomes more widely known.
Weaken :- market for breath freshening products will not decline as the effectiveness of the tongue scraper becomes more widely known.
We are looking for a flaw in argument :-
The flaw in the argument hinges on a implied causal relationship between people knowing certain information, and changing their behaviour. Specifically, the argument is that if people know that tongue scraping is a good way to eliminate bad breath, they will stop purchasing other products (mints, gums, and sprays) for eliminating bad breath.

A recent survey shows that 94% of those who regularly purchase breath freshening products are aware of the effectiveness of the tongue scraper.

Answer D undermines the notion of a causal relationship between knowledge and behaviour change. It says the opposite: that most people who buy other products DO KNOW that tongue scraping is a good way to eliminate bad breath (but they buy the other products anyway).

Answer E is more of a follow up and counterpoint to answer D than it is evidence of a flaw in the passage. Maybe those people like to buy products that are green, for example. That "fact" does not point out a flaw in the argument, it just suggests a reason why people buy the other products.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 669
Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2017, 06:56
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Re: Market Analyst: Recent research confirms that the main cause   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2017, 06:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.