Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
17 Mar 2022, 07:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
PROMPT
The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper.
"Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for over 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
MY RESPONSE (30 MINUTES)
The newspaper article notes the failure of a foreign company (we will refer to its product as Motorcycle Y, or simply Y) to steal the customer base of Motorcycle X (hereafter X), and disputes a claim that this is due to X's noise, which is perceived as a positive trait lacking in the foreign copy. The writer attempts to disprove this claim by referencing successful - and quieter - foreign products, as well as the ads marketing X while drawing no attention to the engine-roar.
The way consumers choose a car is hardly the way in which consumers choose a motorcycle. The automobile market is far more general, as a high percentage of working adults will own a car, whereas the motorcycle market is niche. A buyer of a motorcycle is more likely someone who is using their purchase as an expression of their identity rather than a convenient mode of travel. Loudness of the motorcycle might well be a positive factor for this kind of individual. A survey into the buying rationale of motorcycle fans would provide helpful information in further evaluating this point, as well as finding comparisons within the foreign motorcycle market instead of trying to find an analogy in a very different market.
The second argument is with respect to the advertising strategy of the company selling X. The writer wrongly assumes that, one, the television ads focus on an audience that can only choose between X and Y. In reality, there are many other brands and models of motorcycle, and it seems likely that focusing on durability and sleek lines will attract broader attention in the motorcycle market. Customers interested in several American motorcycle brands, for example, might appreciate the look and longevity of X.
In addition, we can say that the loudness of X is something that commercials won't necessarily need to communicate to the target audience. People who have seen the motorcycle in public, on the road, at a diner or bar, are probably already familiar with the noise. The ad logically focuses on durability, which a typical observer cannot appreciate at first glance, and the sleek lines, which is a strong point to feature in video marketing. A loud engine might even detract from the ad, as music and voice-overs cannot be used simultaneously.
Ultimately, the writer fails to argue convincingly against the belief that the loudness of X is a key selling point that Y is lacking. If the writer were to present relevant information about the foreign motorcycle market, or survey data that summarize reasons American consumers prefer X over Y, the writer could better address the question at hand. This not being the case, the argument as it currently stands is uncompelling.
The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper.
"Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for over 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
MY RESPONSE (30 MINUTES)
The newspaper article notes the failure of a foreign company (we will refer to its product as Motorcycle Y, or simply Y) to steal the customer base of Motorcycle X (hereafter X), and disputes a claim that this is due to X's noise, which is perceived as a positive trait lacking in the foreign copy. The writer attempts to disprove this claim by referencing successful - and quieter - foreign products, as well as the ads marketing X while drawing no attention to the engine-roar.
The way consumers choose a car is hardly the way in which consumers choose a motorcycle. The automobile market is far more general, as a high percentage of working adults will own a car, whereas the motorcycle market is niche. A buyer of a motorcycle is more likely someone who is using their purchase as an expression of their identity rather than a convenient mode of travel. Loudness of the motorcycle might well be a positive factor for this kind of individual. A survey into the buying rationale of motorcycle fans would provide helpful information in further evaluating this point, as well as finding comparisons within the foreign motorcycle market instead of trying to find an analogy in a very different market.
The second argument is with respect to the advertising strategy of the company selling X. The writer wrongly assumes that, one, the television ads focus on an audience that can only choose between X and Y. In reality, there are many other brands and models of motorcycle, and it seems likely that focusing on durability and sleek lines will attract broader attention in the motorcycle market. Customers interested in several American motorcycle brands, for example, might appreciate the look and longevity of X.
In addition, we can say that the loudness of X is something that commercials won't necessarily need to communicate to the target audience. People who have seen the motorcycle in public, on the road, at a diner or bar, are probably already familiar with the noise. The ad logically focuses on durability, which a typical observer cannot appreciate at first glance, and the sleek lines, which is a strong point to feature in video marketing. A loud engine might even detract from the ad, as music and voice-overs cannot be used simultaneously.
Ultimately, the writer fails to argue convincingly against the belief that the loudness of X is a key selling point that Y is lacking. If the writer were to present relevant information about the foreign motorcycle market, or survey data that summarize reasons American consumers prefer X over Y, the writer could better address the question at hand. This not being the case, the argument as it currently stands is uncompelling.
17 Mar 2022, 08:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello hunkyhunky
Welcome to GMAT Club!
I have read many GMAT Books and all of them advise against reading a day before the test. So I would advise you too to take a rest, have a good sleep. and take care of your diet.
Best of luck!
Welcome to GMAT Club!
I have read many GMAT Books and all of them advise against reading a day before the test. So I would advise you too to take a rest, have a good sleep. and take care of your diet.
Best of luck!
17 Mar 2022, 08:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994
Thanks for the advice! Just wanted a few pointers but I promise I won't practice anything today
