Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 07:54 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 07:54

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1428
Own Kudos [?]: 233 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Send PM
avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Status:schools I listed were for the evening programs, not FT
Posts: 379
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: United States (VA)
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 660 Q43 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE:Research (Other)
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 892
Own Kudos [?]: 1207 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Send PM
Re: Why do Adcoms hold decisions? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
There are four reasons I can think of as to why they do this:

1. What do they have to gain by giving out admissions early?
There is no benefit, and there is a chance that they will change their mind. And as more people apply, the more information they will have available.

2. For the sake of the applicants
It is a painful process to wait and hear back. We all know this, and this is probably the reason why you are asking the question. But at the same time, once the admissions committee starts releasing decisions it becomes increasingly painful for the applicants. If they started rolling out admits people would be checking their email and phone every 5 seconds hoping that next email is an admit. If you know they won't post anything until a day or two before the deadline, the wait isn't so agonizing.

There is also another reason to this respect. If they started rolling out admits, you would know that the first people to get the admits would have been the "no questions asked, admit". And the closer it got to the deadline, the more you would know you were on the edge. It would feel like you were the last one picked by the captains at the kickball game. No fun. Or imagine if you were the first to recieve a ding. You'd be the "you suck, ding" applicant. NOOO THANKS.

3. Efficiency
Business school admissions processes are probably one of the most efficient processes around. I mean, you can't work at the business school without all that learning rubbing off. It's most efficient as a team to work through the process, then release all admits, then field questions, then help waitlisters, then start the process over... or something to that effect. This is one of the main reasons why so many schools have turned away from rolling admissions. It just makes more sense to find a process, and repeat it over and over, to maximize efficiency. With more applicants in this down economy, this make more sense then ever.

4. The harder you work to get in, the more you want to be a part of it:
Think of the fraternity brother who gets hazed during rush. This is the worst few months of his life, but when he's done, he feels like part of the group and has created a bond with his fellow members. This is kind of the same with a Bschool. It has been scientifically proven that the harder you work towards something, the more you feel a part of it, and a better sense of achievement you recieve if you accomplish it. So the harder they make you sweat it out, the more you want to be a part of it. It also gives them some leverage. I've heard of some applicants being weary of a bschool where they gained acceptance too easily. For example, if you applied and they accepted you 2 days later, you might think "hey, they really like me, I bet I can do beter!". In some ways its a negotiation tactic. Think of the guy that is waiting for a job offer, and they really make him sweat it out for months. By the time he gets the offer, he is not going to negotiate the salary, he just wants sign the dotted line.

Anyone else with any other ideas?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2011
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 179
Send PM
Re: Why do Adcoms hold decisions? [#permalink]
[quote="GMATLA"] [quote]

I love reading your comments, you are very insightful, detailed and well-thought out :P
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Status:Go Blue!
Posts: 684
Own Kudos [?]: 157 [0]
Given Kudos: 249
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
GPA: 3.22
WE:Management Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Why do Adcoms hold decisions? [#permalink]
My best guess is class mix. They need to know exactly who's been flagged for admit internally, and then they build the class. Some of those admits turn into waitlists. Some of the waitlists turn into dings. The few days between final mix and release date are probably used to update the database for decision generation.

If you go with a rolling admissions process, you're paying no heed to class mix. You just admit every person who looks great and hope it works out in the end. You also run into issues of quality, class size and yield unless you wait. What if you've already admitted your target number, but the best applications were the ones that are on the bottom of your unread pile? Sounds like a giant headache to me!
avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Status:schools I listed were for the evening programs, not FT
Posts: 379
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: United States (VA)
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 660 Q43 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE:Research (Other)
Send PM
Re: Why do Adcoms hold decisions? [#permalink]
method wrote:
My best guess is class mix. They need to know exactly who's been flagged for admit internally, and then they build the class. Some of those admits turn into waitlists. Some of the waitlists turn into dings. The few days between final mix and release date are probably used to update the database for decision generation.

If you go with a rolling admissions process, you're paying no heed to class mix. You just admit every person who looks great and hope it works out in the end. You also run into issues of quality, class size and yield unless you wait. What if you've already admitted your target number, but the best applications were the ones that are on the bottom of your unread pile? Sounds like a giant headache to me!


With rolling admissions, at least to use law schools as an example, even though there is rolling admission for most law schools, it's not like the adcoms there make a decision within a month of receiving a student's application. If a student is clearly in it based on numbers alone, then yes, he/she gets the welcome packet, and if a student's numbers are clearly out of line, the rejection comes quickly. However, law school adcoms seem to be taking their time with the glut of applicants in the middle, and seem to put more students on a wait list, and they use it almost all the time as well. This year, with the considerable drop in applicants, and the apparent lack of realization or underestimation of this from the adcoms, expect the waitlists in law school to be used quite heavily this year over the next several months.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Why do Adcoms hold decisions? [#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne