Critical Reasoning Notes (Topic Wise)
[#permalink]
21 Nov 2012, 17:24
Objective1: Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or only a set of factual statements
Objective2: If stimulus contains an argument, identify the conclusion of the argument. If the stimulus contains the fact set, examine each fact.
- Confusing form – “conclusion/premise indicator”
o Therefore, since, Thus, because, Hence, due to
Format -> combo indicator, <premise>, <conclusion>
Place the statements in an arrangement that forces one to be the conclusion and other to be premise and build the sequence/flow.
Complex constructions: Premise, -> sub-conclusion/premise -> main conclusion (or reverse)
Alternate/opposing viewpoint:
(Although) A number (some, many, etc) of people (critics, students, legislators, etc) believe (claim, propose, argue, etc) that...
Objective3: If stimulus contains an argument, determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Do premises strongly support conclusion?
Does conclusion go beyond the scope of the premises information? Etc
You can accept GMAC premises as accurate, but don’t have to accept the conclusion.
Objective4: Read closely and know precisely what author said. Do not generalize.
Quantity Indicators: all, every, most, many some, several, few, sole, only, not all, none.
Probability Indicators: Must, will, always, not always, probably, likely, would, not necessarily, could, rarely, never
Objective5: Carefully read and identify the question stem. Do not assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain question types.
Objective#6: Prephrase: after reading the question stem.
Objective#7: Always read each of the five answer choices.
Objective#8: Separate the answer choices into contenders and losers. After completing the process, review the contenders and choose the one which is correct. (must refer this in the book – Page 69)
Objective#9: If all five answer choices appear losers, then return to stimulus and evaluate the argument.