Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Let’s dive deep into advanced CR to ace GMAT Focus! Join this webinar to unlock the secrets to conquering Boldface and Paradox questions with expert insights and strategies. Elevate your skills and boost your GMAT Verbal Score now!
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Think a 100% GMAT Focus Verbal score is out of your reach? TTP will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Do you want to ace the GMAT Focus? Join Piyush Beriwala in this webinar as he guides you through a smart study plan to achieve the 99th %ile on the GMAT Focus. Learn the best strategies and tips to master the test and boost your score.
In this podcast, we talk to Lindsay Loyd, Executive Director, of MBA Admissions at NYU Stern, Hunter Brickey, NYU Stern alumnus and Daisy Cheng, a current student at NYU Stern, and more.
The Target Test Prep team is excited to announce multiple live online classes for GMAT Focus test-takers in May. Our 40-hour LiveTeach program will take your GMAT Focus score to the next level.
Ever wondered how to score a perfect 805 on the GMAT? Julia did it, and she’s here to share her journey to an impressive 805 GMAT Focus score! Scoring 805 is an incredible achievement, and Julia’s story is sure to inspire you.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight fair, the biggest MBA fair of the year. You will have a chance to hear Admissions directors from almost every Top 20 program speak, network with peers, and more.
OA a few posts below. Many people believe that because
[#permalink]
Updated on: 07 Aug 2005, 02:10
OA a few posts below.
Many people believe that because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries. Currently, developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages. Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers. When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise. Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low. However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages. Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country. And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely.
1. The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?
A Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.
B Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.
C A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.
D A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.
E Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.
2. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A identify the origin of a common misconception
B discuss the implications of a generally accepted principle
C present information relevant in evaluating a commonly held belief
D defend a controversial assertion against a variety of counterarguments
E explain under what circumstances a well-known phenomenon occurs
Please, provide explanations.
Source – GMATPrep by Pearson VUE
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Originally posted by Pauline on 06 Aug 2005, 03:30.
Last edited by Pauline on 07 Aug 2005, 02:10, edited 1 time in total.
Re: OA a few posts below. Many people believe that because
[#permalink]
26 Mar 2006, 01:04
Quote:
Expln. for D....
If the flow of capital is restricted, then the developing country can undervalue its currency to keep the prod. rate high while not raising wages.
D A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.
I don't know if you meant productivity or production rate.
If it is the 2nd, I agree, however it doesnt mean that the productivity will increase as D states.
If you meant productivity, I disagree. It is not because you keep wages low, that the productivity will increase. On the opposite.
One assertion of D is that the productivity could increase. From which part in
the text can we infer that?
Re: OA a few posts below. Many people believe that because
[#permalink]
27 Mar 2006, 23:26
Many people believe that because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries. Currently, developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages. Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers. When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise. Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low. However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages. Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country. And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely.
karlfurt wrote:
Quote:
Expln. for D....
If the flow of capital is restricted, then the developing country can undervalue its currency to keep the prod. rate high while not raising wages.
D A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.
I don't know if you meant productivity or production rate. If it is the 2nd, I agree, however it doesnt mean that the productivity will increase as D states. If you meant productivity, I disagree. It is not because you keep wages low, that the productivity will increase. On the opposite.
One assertion of D is that the productivity could increase. From which part in the text can we infer that?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: OA a few posts below. Many people believe that because [#permalink]