Last visit was: 23 May 2024, 00:51 It is currently 23 May 2024, 00:51
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
Unanswered
Active Topics
New posts
New comers' posts
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93409
Own Kudos [?]: 625956 [78]
Given Kudos: 81940
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Mar 2015, 05:58
8
Kudos
70
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

27% (02:52) correct 73% (02:30) wrong based on 668 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N is not a power of D. Is D a prime number?

(1) N has exactly four factors, and D is a factor of N
(2) D = (3^P) + 2
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93409
Own Kudos [?]: 625956 [26]
Given Kudos: 81940
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   23 Mar 2015, 05:57
11
Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N is not a power of D. Is D a prime number?

(1) N has exactly four factors, and D is a factor of N
(2) D = (3^P) + 2


Kudos for a correct solution.


MAGOOSH OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

This is a tricky one.

Statement #1: two kinds of numbers have exactly four factors: (a) products of two distinct prime numbers, and (b) cubes of prime numbers.

The product of two distinct prime numbers S and T would have factors {1, S, T, ST}. For example, the factors of 10 are (1, 2, 5, 10), and the factors of 21 are {1, 3, 7, 21}.

The cube of a prime number S would have as factors 1, S, S squared, and S cubed. For example, 8 has factors {1, 2, 4, 8} and 27 has factors {1, 3, 9, 27}.

We know N is not a power of D, so the second case is excluded. N must be the product of two distinct prime numbers. We know D < N, so of the four factors, D can’t be the product of the two prime numbers. D could be either of the prime number factors, or D could be 1, which is not a prime number. Because D could either be a prime number or 1, we cannot give a definitive answer to the question. This statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient.

Statement #2: this is tricky. The first few plug-ins seem to reveal a pattern.



Even if you sense a pattern, it’s important to remember that plugging in numbers alone is never enough to establish that a DS statement is sufficient. Here, if we persevered to one more plug-in, we would find the one that breaks the pattern.
P = 5 --> 3^5 + 2 = 243, which is not a prime.

That gives another answer to the prompt, so we know this statement is not sufficient.

To avoid a lot of plugging in, it’s also very good to know that in mathematics, prime numbers are notorious for not following any easy pattern. It is impossible to produce an algebraic formula that will always produce prime numbers. In fact, this is more than you need to know, but the hardest unsolved question in higher mathematics, the Riemann Hypothesis, concerns the pattern of prime numbers; mathematicians have been working on this since 1859, and no one has proven it yet. Suffice to say that no one-line algebraic formula is going to unlock the mystery of prime numbers!

Combined statements: according to the information in statement #1, either D = 1 or D is a prime number. Well, statement #2 excludes the possibility that D = 1, because that number cannot be written as two more than a power of 3. Therefore, D must be a prime number. We have a definitive answer to the prompt question. Combined, the statements are sufficient.

Answer = (C)

Show Spoiler
Attachment:
ghdmpp_img25.png
ghdmpp_img25.png [ 6.41 KiB | Viewed 16843 times ]
User avatar
sterling19
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 136 [5]
Given Kudos: 236
Concentration: Technology, Finance
WE:Analyst (Other)
Send PM
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Mar 2015, 07:51
5
Kudos
I will say C. Please let me know if I am missing something.

(1) The four factors of N include 1, D, something, and N. Therefore, N is the product of D and something.
Test case 1: N = 6 so D is either 2 or 3 and therefore is prime.
Test case 2: N = 8 so D is 4 and not prime (D cannot be 2 because 8 is a power of 2, which violates the constraints.)


(2) Possible values for D include 5, 11, 29, 83, 245, ... etc.
We have prime and non-prime possibilities, so this is insufficient.

Combining the statements, D must be one of the prime values given in statement 2, otherwise N would have more than four factors.
General Discussion
User avatar
Lucky2783
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Mar 2015, 08:10
Bunuel wrote:
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N is not a power of D. Is D a prime number?

(1) N has exactly four factors, and D is a factor of N
(2) D = (3^P) + 2


Kudos for a correct solution.



Option A:N has exactly four factors, and D is a factor of N : Not Sufficient
\(2^1 * 3^1\) factors are 1,2,3,6 ; D can be 2 or 1 . Not sufficient.
\(19^1 * 2^1\) factors are 1,2,19,38 ; D can be 19,2,1 . (note 1 is not prime)
Option B: D = (3^P) + 2 Not Sufficient
\(P=1; D=5 is prime ? Yes\)
\(P=5; D=245 is prime ? NO\)

A && B
from B we know that D is and ODD Integer and from A we have
D can be 19,2,1 . (note 1 is not prime) 19 is prime but 1 is not so still the statement is insufficient.

Answer E
User avatar
sterling19
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 136 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Concentration: Technology, Finance
WE:Analyst (Other)
Send PM
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Mar 2015, 10:02
1
Kudos
Lucky2783 wrote:
D can be 19,2,1 . (note 1 is not prime) 19 is prime but 1 is not so still the statement is insufficient.


If D = 1, then 3^P = -1 and P is not a positive integer, violating the constraint given in the problem. (Same with D = 2 or 19)
User avatar
Lucky2783
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Mar 2015, 10:24
sterling19 wrote:
Lucky2783 wrote:
D can be 19,2,1 . (note 1 is not prime) 19 is prime but 1 is not so still the statement is insufficient.


If D = 1, then 3^P = -1 and P is not a positive integer, violating the constraint given in the problem. (Same with D = 2 or 19)



good catch !!
Answer is C.
User avatar
Lucky2783
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   23 Mar 2015, 06:50
1
Bookmarks
Lucky2783 wrote:
sterling19 wrote:
Lucky2783 wrote:
D can be 19,2,1 . (note 1 is not prime) 19 is prime but 1 is not so still the statement is insufficient.


If D = 1, then 3^P = -1 and P is not a positive integer, violating the constraint given in the problem. (Same with D = 2 or 19)



good catch !!
Answer is C.



Hi Bunuel,

We (me and @sterling19) have come up with number substitution solution for this question but it took me 2-3 mins to write the test cases ,
is there a better way to attack this question apart from the magoosh official solution ?
avatar
B
rahulkashyap
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 174
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   17 Nov 2015, 08:58
Bunuel
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N is not a power of D. Is D a prime number?

(1) N has exactly four factors, and D is a factor of N
(2) D = (3^P) + 2


Kudos for a correct solution.


MAGOOSH OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

This is a tricky one.

Statement #1: two kinds of numbers have exactly four factors: (a) products of two distinct prime numbers, and (b) cubes of prime numbers.

The product of two distinct prime numbers S and T would have factors {1, S, T, ST}. For example, the factors of 10 are (1, 2, 5, 10), and the factors of 21 are {1, 3, 7, 21}.

The cube of a prime number S would have as factors 1, S, S squared, and S cubed. For example, 8 has factors {1, 2, 4, 8} and 27 has factors {1, 3, 9, 27}.

We know N is not a power of D, so the second case is excluded. N must be the product of two distinct prime numbers. We know D < N, so of the four factors, D can’t be the product of the two prime numbers. D could be either of the prime number factors, or D could be 1, which is not a prime number. Because D could either be a prime number or 1, we cannot give a definitive answer to the question. This statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient.

Statement #2: this is tricky. The first few plug-ins seem to reveal a pattern.



Even if you sense a pattern, it’s important to remember that plugging in numbers alone is never enough to establish that a DS statement is sufficient. Here, if we persevered to one more plug-in, we would find the one that breaks the pattern.
P = 5 --> 3^5 + 2 = 243, which is not a prime.

That gives another answer to the prompt, so we know this statement is not sufficient.

To avoid a lot of plugging in, it’s also very good to know that in mathematics, prime numbers are notorious for not following any easy pattern. It is impossible to produce an algebraic formula that will always produce prime numbers. In fact, this is more than you need to know, but the hardest unsolved question in higher mathematics, the Riemann Hypothesis, concerns the pattern of prime numbers; mathematicians have been working on this since 1859, and no one has proven it yet. Suffice to say that no one-line algebraic formula is going to unlock the mystery of prime numbers!

Combined statements: according to the information in statement #1, either D = 1 or D is a prime number. Well, statement #2 excludes the possibility that D = 1, because that number cannot be written as two more than a power of 3. Therefore, D must be a prime number. We have a definitive answer to the prompt question. Combined, the statements are sufficient.

Answer = (C)


if N is a cube of a prime, n = 27
in this case we can have d as either 1 or 9, right?
why have we completely ignored the case of n being a cube of a prime no?
avatar
B
manan90
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   26 Jun 2021, 04:08
here the question says that N is Not power of D. Which implies that D can't be 1 as every number is power of 1. So, correct answer is (A) in my opinion.

Thanks :)
avatar
S
kri1311
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Schools: HEC MiM "24
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   31 Jul 2021, 02:44
In the explanation,

P = 5 --> 3^5 + 2 = 243
It should be 245 and not 243. However both are not prime.
User avatar
B
Amogh2203
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink] The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N   11 Nov 2023, 01:00
8 is not a power of 4 . so how we cant reject this case of (1,2,4,8) in the first statement. can anyone pls help me on this ?
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: The numbers D, N, and P are positive integers, such that D < N, and N [#permalink]
11 Nov 2023, 01:00
Moderator:
Bunuel
Math Expert
93405 posts