Given the ascending set of positive integers {a, b, c, d, e,

It's a GMAT type question, but from my point of view not a very good one.

if all of the integers are positive, then how come c+d<o ?
question system contradicts with the solution...
You are right Bunuel.. not an air tight question.

The question is fine in that respect.

After some manipulations the question became "is c+d<0?" So, c+d<0 is not a statement, it's a question and since we know that c and d are positive numbers, then the answer to this question is NO.

Hope it's clear.

We don't have to do any calculations here. For mean, we have to have the sum of the all the numbers in the set while for for the median c and d are sufficient. Since both the options together can give us the mean in terms of c+d, we can compare that against the mean which is also in terms of c+d. So C should be the right choice.

Below is the best reply that I have found on another forum. It's quite understandable.

Median = (c+d)/2
Average = (a+b+c+d+e+f)/6

Median > Average
(c+d)/2 > (a+b+c+d+e+f)/6
3c + 3d > a+b+c+d+e+f
2c + 2d > a+b+e+f
2(c+d) > a+b+e+f

Thus, the question can be rephrased:

Is 2(c+d) > a+b+e+f?

Statement 1: a + e = (3/4)(c + d)
No information about b+f.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: b + f = (4/3)(c + d)
No information about a+e.
Insufficient.

Statement 1 and 2 together:
Adding the equations, we get:
a+b+e+f = (3/4)(c+d) + (4/3)(c+d)
a+b+e+f = (3/4 + 4/3)(c+d)
a+b+e+f = (25/12)(c+d)
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.

The problem asks if (C+D)/2 > (A+B+C+D+E+F)/6?

In other words, is 2C + 2D > A+B+E+F?

Statement 1: A+E = 3/4*(C+D)

We can quickly realize that B and F are unknown, so we cannot answer the question provided (is 2C+2D>A+B+E+F?). Insufficient.

Statement 2: Here we are given B+F = 4/3(C+D). Similarly, we do not know the values of A or E, so this statement is insufficient.

Statements 1+2: When combined, we know that B+F and A+E can be expressed in terms of C and D, so via substitution we can do algebra to arrive at this answer:

2C + 2D > 25/12C + 25/12D? No, because 25/12 > 2.

Sufficient.

Hi All,

This is a layered question, but it can be solved with a mix of TESTing VALUES and Algebra.

We're told that the variables A, B, C, D, E, and F are ASCENDING POSITIVE INTEGERS (meaning that they are unique, A is smallest, F is largest, etc.). We're asked if the MEDIAN is greater than the MEAN. This is a YES/NO question.

1) A+E = (3/4)(C+D)

Without information about B and F, your instinct is probably to call this insufficient. We can prove it rather easily though. From this equation, since all of the variables are INTEGERS, we know that A+E must sum to an integer. By extension, (C+D) will have to be a multiple of 4.

IF....
C+D = 12, we could have...
A=1
B=2
C=5
D=7
E=8
F=9 or higher
MEDIAN = (5+7)/2 = 6
MEAN = 32/6 = 5 1/3 OR HIGHER (depending on the value of F)
Thus, the median may or may not be greater than the mean (again, depending on the value of F)
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) B+F = (4/3)(C+D)

Here, we have a similar situation to what we had in Fact 1, but here we do not know much about the values of A and E. Here, I'm going to TEST much larger values so that we can see the potential 'swings' in the MEAN...

IF....
C+D = 120, we could have...
A=1-48
B=49
C=50
D=70
E=71 - 110
F=111
MEDIAN = (50+70)/2 = 60
MEAN = 352/6 - 438/6 = A little less than 60 to a little more than 70.
Thus, the median may or may not be greater than the mean (again, depending on the values of A and E)
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, there's actually an interesting algebra pattern that we can take advantage of. The sum of ALL of the variables can be put in terms of (C+D)....

A+E = (3/4)(C+D)
C+D = (C+D)
B+F = (4/3)(C+D)

Thus, A+B+C+D+E+F = (3/4 + 1 + 4/3)(C+D)
Sum = (9/12 + 12/12 + 16/12)(C+D)
Sum = (37/12)(C+D)

The MEAN of those 6 terms = (37/12)(C+D)/6 = (37/72)(C+D)
The MEDIAN of those 6 terms = (C+D)/2 = (1/2)(C+D) = (36/72)(C+D)

Comparing the median and the mean now, we can see that the median will ALWAYS be less than the mean. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.

Final Answer:

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

My solution, correct me if i am wrong:

question: Avg of a,b,c,d,e,f < c+d/2

statement 1- a+e= 3/4(c=d) . ... insufficient since we dont know about other integers.

Statement 2- b+f= 4/3(c+d)...insufficient coz it didnt mention anything about a and e.

Statement 1 and 2 together
a+e =3/4(c+d)
4(a+e)= 3(c+d)
(a+e)/(c+d)= 3/4 ----1

b+f= 4/3(c+d)
3(b+f)= 4(c+d)
3/4= c+d/b+f-------2

12/9= c+d/a+e
12/16= c+d/b+f

c+d+a+e+b+f= 12+9+16= 37
Avg= 37/6
= 6.16<c+d
(c+d=12)

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.