Last visit was: 30 Apr 2024, 16:27 It is currently 30 Apr 2024, 16:27

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93034
Own Kudos [?]: 620284 [4]
Given Kudos: 81694
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 824 [2]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 737
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [0]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11200
Own Kudos [?]: 32098 [2]
Given Kudos: 298
Send PM
Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
NandishSS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x - 3| < 5

(2) |x + 2| > 5


HI chetan2u,

(1) |x - 3| < 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-1 gives No x<0

(2) |x + 2| > 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-8 gives No x<0

Combining both gives x>0

Hence C

Is it correct? Where am I going wrong?


Yes, you are correct, but testing numbers may not get you correct always.

So let's see how do you do this..

1) |x-3|<5
Two areas..
x-3 is positive.....x-3<5....x<8
x-3 is NEGATIVE....-(x-3)<5....x-3>-5....x>-2.
Range -2<x<8
Insufficient

2) |x+2|>5
Again two cases as above
x+2>5....x>3
x+2<-5....x<-7....
(This is where you have gone wrong @TaN1213)
Insufficient

Combined..
In NEGATIVE, the two ranges are x>-2 and x<-7... Nothing in common
In POSITIVE, x>3 and x<8.... Common range 3< x<8
So sufficient
Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 737
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [0]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
chetan2u wrote:
NandishSS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x - 3| < 5

(2) |x + 2| > 5


HI chetan2u,

(1) |x - 3| < 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-1 gives No x<0

(2) |x + 2| > 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-8 gives No x<0

Combining both gives x>0

Hence C

Is it correct? Where am I going wrong?


Yes, you are correct, but testing numbers may not get you correct always.

So let's see how do you do this..

1) |x-3|<5
Two areas..
x-3 is positive.....x-3<5....x<8
x-3 is NEGATIVE....-(x-3)<5....x-3>-5....x>-2.
Range -2<x<8
Insufficient

2) |x+2|>5
Again two cases as above
x+2>5....x>3
x+2<-5....x<-7....
(This is where you have gone wrong @TaN1213)
Insufficient

Combined..
In NEGATIVE, the two ranges are x>-2 and x<-7... Nothing in common
In POSITIVE, x>3 and x<8.... Common range 3< x<8
So sufficient


This Looks good :thumbup: Sirji :-)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 824 [0]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
chetan2u wrote:
NandishSS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x - 3| < 5

(2) |x + 2| > 5


HI chetan2u,

(1) |x - 3| < 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-1 gives No x<0

(2) |x + 2| > 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-8 gives No x<0

Combining both gives x>0

Hence C

Is it correct? Where am I going wrong?


Yes, you are correct, but testing numbers may not get you correct always.

So let's see how do you do this..

1) |x-3|<5
Two areas..
x-3 is positive.....x-3<5....x<8
x-3 is NEGATIVE....-(x-3)<5....x-3>-5....x>-2.
Range -2<x<8
Insufficient

2) |x+2|>5
Again two cases as above
x+2>5....x>3
x+2<-5....x<-7....
(This is where you have gone wrong @TaN1213)
Insufficient

Combined..
In NEGATIVE, the two ranges are x>-2 and x<-7... Nothing in common
In POSITIVE, x>3 and x<8.... Common range 3< x<8
So sufficient


Thanks Chetan. I just re-did the sum and got it right this time. Wondering what was I thinking. Thank God this is a DS problem. :)
I will be editing the post.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
Graphical approach to this question...

Provide kudos if u like my approach

NandishSS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x > 0 ?

(1) |x - 3| < 5

(2) |x + 2| > 5



HI chetan2u,

(1) |x - 3| < 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-1 gives No x<0

(2) |x + 2| > 5

x=5 gives Yes x>0

x=-8 gives No x<0

Combining both gives x>0

Hence C

Is it correct? Where am I going wrong?

Attachments

24169582_10156971957128289_533371546_o.jpg
24169582_10156971957128289_533371546_o.jpg [ 106.12 KiB | Viewed 2373 times ]

User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32762
Own Kudos [?]: 823 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is x > 0 ? (1) |x - 3| < 5 (2) |x + 2| > 5 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
93034 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne