Last visit was: 31 Oct 2024, 16:53 It is currently 31 Oct 2024, 16:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 96,533
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87,883
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,533
Kudos: 673,100
 [46]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
41
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,079
Own Kudos:
9,222
 [6]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,079
Kudos: 9,222
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
shubhraghosh
Joined: 11 Apr 2016
Last visit: 21 Jul 2022
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
59
 [3]
Given Kudos: 81
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.94
WE:Asset Management (Finance: Venture Capital)
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 20
Kudos: 59
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sriramsundaram91
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 17 Sep 2024
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
89
 [1]
Given Kudos: 110
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 49
Kudos: 89
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Researchers have concluded from a survey of people aged 65 that emotional well-being in adulthood is closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life. Those surveyed who had never had any siblings or who said that at college age they were emotionally distant from their siblings were emotionally less well adjusted at 65 than were those who had been close to at least one brother or sister.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researchers’ argument?


(A) As they get older, many people think more about their mortality and thus must confront feelings of loneliness and isolation.

(B) People suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment usually remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were.

(C) Memory of one’s past plays a greater role in the emotional well-being of older people than it does in that of younger people.

(D) Few people can correctly identify the true sources of their emotional well-being or of their emotional difficulties.




(E) Siblings are more likely to have major arguments and deep differences of opinion at college age than at any other time of their lives.


Similar Question: https://gmatclub.com/forum/researchers- ... 81016.html


I got this one wrong. But analysing the solution gave me beautiful insights...

(B) People suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment usually remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were.

This option says... if a person A is emotionally distressed of maladjustment... A remembers being less intimate with their brothers/sisters than they actually were... which means A was emotionally close with his/her brother or sister... but he remembers being not very close... because he is currently under emotional stress.. therefore the survey saying emotional closeness in childhood is a measure of emotional stability in old age is wrong.. because it is based on false data.. A is emotionally distressed now.. but that is not because he was not close with A's brother/ sister ... Hats off to this question and to GMAT...
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 28 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,234
Own Kudos:
588
 [1]
Given Kudos: 754
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,234
Kudos: 588
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Researchers have concluded from a survey of people aged 65 that emotional well-being in adulthood is closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life. Those surveyed who had never had any siblings or who said that at college age they were emotionally distant from their siblings were emotionally less well adjusted at 65 than were those who had been close to at least one brother or sister.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researchers’ argument?


(A) As they get older, many people think more about their mortality and thus must confront feelings of loneliness and isolation.

(B) People suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment usually remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were.

(C) Memory of one’s past plays a greater role in the emotional well-being of older people than it does in that of younger people.

(D) Few people can correctly identify the true sources of their emotional well-being or of their emotional difficulties.

(E) Siblings are more likely to have major arguments and deep differences of opinion at college age than at any other time of their lives.


Similar Question: https://gmatclub.com/forum/researchers- ... 81016.html

Conclusion :- Emotional well-being in adulthood is closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life.

For weakening we need to show that "Emotional well-being in adulthood is NOT closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life. "

Option B states that "People suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment usually remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were."

That means the people suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment were also intimate with their siblings but they are now suffering from emotional distress.

Hence , we can show that "Emotional well-being in adulthood is NOT closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life. "

B is the answer.

Please give me kudos if you liked my explanation.
avatar
krittapat
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2023
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,515
Location: Thailand
Posts: 46
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could you please help explain why option C is incorrect?
Is it because it's trying to address older people VS younger people instead of comparing older people with close siblings VS older ones without siblings?
egmat GMATNinja KarishmaB mikemcgarry
User avatar
PyjamaScientist
User avatar
Admitted - Which School Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Oct 2020
Last visit: 02 Sep 2024
Posts: 1,118
Own Kudos:
1,148
 [1]
Given Kudos: 628
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Posts: 1,118
Kudos: 1,148
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krittapat
Could you please help explain why option C is incorrect?
Is it because it's trying to address older people VS younger people instead of comparing older people with close siblings VS older ones without siblings?
egmat GMATNinja KarishmaB mikemcgarry
krittapat I hope one of the legends whom you have tagged reply. If not, I hope this helps-

Option (C), brings in outside information that you really don't need to undermine the conclusion of our argument.

(C) states, "Memory of one’s past plays a greater role in the emotional well-being of older people than it does in that of younger people."

But our conclusion is, "emotional well-being in adulthood is closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life.".

You need to ask- How does (C) affect our conclusion?

Even if the information presented in (C) is true, does it weaken your belief in the conclusion of our argument? Maybe , memories do play a greater role in the emotional well being of older people than it does in that of younger people, but that fact doesn't undermine the claim that emotional well being in adulthood is related to intimacy with siblings earlier. So, that way (C) doesn't really do much to either weaken or strengthen our conclusion as it is quite irrelevant to our conclusion at hand.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 7,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,853
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,108
Kudos: 65,554
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krittapat
Could you please help explain why option C is incorrect?
Is it because it's trying to address older people VS younger people instead of comparing older people with close siblings VS older ones without siblings?
egmat GMATNinja KarishmaB mikemcgarry
You're on the right track!

We're trying to weaken the argument that "emotional well-being in adulthood is closely related to intimacy with siblings earlier in life." Researchers have come to this conclusion after surveying a bunch of older people. The old people with close connections to siblings in their early years were happier than the old people who did not have such close connections.

As you've noted, this sets up a comparison between two groups of older people.

Here's (C):
Quote:
(C) Memory of one’s past plays a greater role in the emotional well-being of older people than it does in that of younger people.
(C) talks about older people in general and compares these old people to younger people. The old people are more impacted by their memories.

That's completely compatible with the researchers' argument -- the researchers don't particularly care whether young people are impacted by memories. They only care that old people can be sorted into different groups based on the strength of their connections to siblings.

(C) doesn't weaken the author's argument, so eliminate (C).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 761
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Products:
Posts: 761
Kudos: 95
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The key here is the relationship.
Intimacy with siblings >> Emotional well-being in adulthood

To weaken- what if the relationship is reversed - People who are emotionally well >> they remember the good memories. That's what B does.

Option elimination -

(A) As they get older, many people think more about their mortality and thus must confront feelings of loneliness and isolation. - What they should do is out of scope.

(B) People suffering from the emotional distress of maladjustment usually remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were. - ok

(C) Memory of one’s past plays a greater role in the emotional well-being of older people than it does in that of younger people. - Memory and the comparison with younger people are out of scope.

(D) Few people can correctly identify the true sources of their emotional well-being or of their emotional difficulties. - The scope of the argument is limited to an option that will weaken the relationship "Intimacy with siblings >> Emotional well-being in adulthood". Does it in any way affect the scope? No

(E) Siblings are more likely to have major arguments and deep differences of opinion at college age than at any other time of their lives. - Distortion
User avatar
Kratosgmat
Joined: 26 Sep 2022
Last visit: 19 Sep 2024
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Other
GRE 1: Q164 V158
GRE 2: Q170 V163
GRE 1: Q164 V158
GRE 2: Q170 V163
Posts: 79
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ts quite easy to select B.....
As per argument better intimacy with siblings earlier in life = better emotional well-being

but
option says People suffering from the emotional distress remember being less intimate with other people than they actually were.

So, even if they were very close in childhood, the person would have forgotten at age 65 and this doesnt ensure better emotional well-being. Or rather, better intimacy with siblings earlier in life doesnt necessarily mean better emotional well-being
User avatar
kkannan2
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Aug 2024
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Posts: 32
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja - What is wrong with Choice (A) here? How is it easy to eliminate as irrelevant? If people who are older start thinking about mortality and start confronting feelings of loneliness and isolation as a result, then wouldn't this offer us an alternative explanation for why people's emotional well-being is affected negatively as they age (aside from intimacy from their siblings earlier in life)? All we have from the passage is mere correlation: "Those surveyed who had never had any siblings or who said that at college age they were emotionally distant from their siblings were emotionally less well adjusted at 65 than were those who had been close to at least one brother or sister". This is not enough to say that lack of intimacy with siblings earlier in life leads to less emotional adjustment at 65 than with intimacy with siblings earlier in life does. Need some help with this one.
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 726
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
Posts: 726
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kkannan2
GMATNinja - What is wrong with Choice (A) here? How is it easy to eliminate as irrelevant? If people who are older start thinking about mortality and start confronting feelings of loneliness and isolation as a result, then wouldn't this offer us an alternative explanation for why people's emotional well-being is affected negatively as they age (aside from intimacy from their siblings earlier in life)? All we have from the passage is mere correlation: "Those surveyed who had never had any siblings or who said that at college age they were emotionally distant from their siblings were emotionally less well adjusted at 65 than were those who had been close to at least one brother or sister". This is not enough to say that lack of intimacy with siblings earlier in life leads to less emotional adjustment at 65 than with intimacy with siblings earlier in life does. Need some help with this one.
­Totally agree. Although B is Inverse of Cause & Effect, but A is also not easy to elim
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 7,108
Own Kudos:
65,554
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,853
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,108
Kudos: 65,554
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Oppenheimer1945
kkannan2
[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D - What is wrong with Choice (A) here? How is it easy to eliminate as irrelevant? If people who are older start thinking about mortality and start confronting feelings of loneliness and isolation as a result, then wouldn't this offer us an alternative explanation for why people's emotional well-being is affected negatively as they age (aside from intimacy from their siblings earlier in life)? All we have from the passage is mere correlation: "Those surveyed who had never had any siblings or who said that at college age they were emotionally distant from their siblings were emotionally less well adjusted at 65 than were those who had been close to at least one brother or sister". This is not enough to say that lack of intimacy with siblings earlier in life leads to less emotional adjustment at 65 than with intimacy with siblings earlier in life does. Need some help with this one.
­Totally agree. Although B is Inverse of Cause & Effect, but A is also not easy to elim

­If (A) is true, then it should affect both groups in the survey equally. If thinking about mortality and confronting feelings of loneliness and isolation is something that many people do as they get older, why is there a discrepancy between the two groups?

(A) doesn't change the survey results, and those results indicate that there's a discrepancy that needs to be explained -- the researchers' argument is applicable regardless of whether (A) is true.­

I hope that helps a bit!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7108 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts