Last visit was: 18 May 2024, 03:45 It is currently 18 May 2024, 03:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Level,    Word Problems,                      
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 24030 [9]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Posts: 21843
Own Kudos [?]: 11684 [5]
Given Kudos: 450
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6817
Own Kudos [?]: 30245 [5]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93334
Own Kudos [?]: 624634 [0]
Given Kudos: 81899
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Expert Reply
On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were company employees and the remaining passengers were their guests. If 3/4 of the company-employee passengers were managers, what was the number of company-employee passengers who were NOT managers?

Since 3/4 of the company-employee passengers were managers, then 1-3/4=1/4 of the company-employee passengers were NOT managers. Therefore the number of company-employee passengers who were NOT managers is (total # of passengers)*2/3*1/4. So, we have that to answer the question we need to know how many passengers were on the cruise.

(1) There were 690 passengers on the cruise. Sufficient.

(2) There were 230 passengers who were guests of the company employees --> 230 guests represent 1-2/3=1/3 of all passengers, thus there were total of 230*3=690 passengers on the cruise. Sufficient.

Answer: D.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel

I made a chart after this question threw me off a bit

lEmployees l Guests l Total
Manager l(3/4)(2/3X) l
Not Manager l (1/4)(2/3X)l
Total l 2/3X l 1/3 X l X

(1) 690 = X so sufficient
(2) 1/3X = 230 which gives us the total

I came close to the 2 minute mark so I determined the answer is D after constructing this chart quickly. Are the any potential setbacks in using this matrix approach?

Thank you
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1260
Own Kudos [?]: 1249 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
GMATPrepNow chetan2u VeritasKarishma EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can you advise how can I infer:

Quote:
Since none of the guests were managers, we know that the top-right box contains zero passengers
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14891
Own Kudos [?]: 65343 [1]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Expert Reply
adkikani wrote:
GMATPrepNow chetan2u VeritasKarishma EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can you advise how can I infer:

Quote:
Since none of the guests were managers, we know that the top-right box contains zero passengers



There is a segregation of managers vs non managers only among the employees. Rest are all guests of employees (think kids) so there is no manager vs non manager among guests.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 53
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Walkabout wrote:
On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were company employees and the remaining passengers were their guests. If 3/4 of the company-employee passengers were managers, what was the number of company-employee passengers who were NOT managers?

(1) There were 690 passengers on the cruise.
(2) There were 230 passengers who were guests of the company employees.


I don't understand why all those explanations must be so complicated.

Here's how I solved it:
If a DS question asks for the concrete value of one element of a ratio, you will need BOTH the concrete value (of another element of the ratio) AND the relative value (of two elements of the ratio).

Following this rule, I got an answer in under 30 seconds.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Posts: 21843
Own Kudos [?]: 11684 [0]
Given Kudos: 450
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Hi kamrim322,

If you can correctly answer a GMAT question in under 30 seconds, then that's great. That having been said, DS questions are interesting in that they have no 'safety net' - meaning that if you make a little mistake, then you will not realize it. You will simply convince yourself that one of the wrong answers is correct. Thankfully, the 'math' behind most DS questions isn't that complicated, so if you're certain that you know what the answer is, then it typically won't take long for you to prove that you are correct.

During your studies and practice CATs/mocks, how many times have you gotten a DS question wrong that you COULD have gotten correct if you had just done a little more work? If you can consistently hit Q51, then you should feel free to approach the Quant section however you choose. If you're consistently missing out on some easy points though, then you will have to make some changes to how you 'see' (and respond to) the Exam before you will be able to consistently score at a higher level.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 33057
Own Kudos [?]: 828 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: On a company-sponsored cruise, 2/3 of the passengers were [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
93335 posts