Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0810:30 AM PDT
-11:30 AM PDT
oin us for an insightful conversation with Selena Salazar, a seasoned product manager who has successfully navigated her career through industry giants like Meta and Apple.- Jun 11
05:40 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight fair, the biggest MBA fair of the year. You will have a chance to hear Admissions directors from almost every Top 20 program speak, network with peers, and more. 
Jun 1111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Magoosh students get into top business schools like MIT Sloan, HBS, Stanford GSB, Wharton and more! See why over 6 million students trust us for exam prep.
Jun 1310:00 AM EDT
-10:30 AM EDT
Level up your Chicago Booth MBA application! Sia Admissions will be LIVE on June 13th for expert guidance on crafting your application that resonates with admission committees. Learn core themes, personal branding tips, and strategies and more.
Jun 1311:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
TTP has received over 700 reviews on GMAT Club! This incredible milestone is a testament to our dedication to helping students score high on the GMAT for over a decade.
Jun 1412:00 PM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT Focus Edition? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.
Jun 1505:30 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Students often dismiss common traps as silly mistakes, which can cost them 30-40 points on the GMAT. In this webinar, we’ll discuss the most frequent traps set by GMAT and the strategies needed to consistently avoid them.
Jun 1511:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Jun 1508:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jun 1605:30 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Not only the typical inference questions but also all other CR questions on the GMAT require the ability to deduce from the given information. Come master how to draw inferences accurately and efficiently with Verbal Expert-Sunita Singhvi.- Jun 16
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
As part of an economic development plan. Country Y has made a great
[#permalink]
12 Mar 2024, 01:04
12 Mar 2024, 01:04
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
51% (02:19) correct
49%
(02:30)
wrong
based on 211
sessions
As part of an economic development plan. Country Y has made a great effort over the last twenty years to increase the number of new drugs and medical devices produced by its companies—even though there have been budget cuts in some areas. However, despite the increases in government grants and tax incentives, the number of new drugs and devices approved by the government regulatory agency has actually dropped by 30 percent over ten years—even though the approval process has not changed nor the diligence with which it is carried out.
Which of the following, if true, would most help to explain why the 30 percent drop has occurred?
A. Funding for staffing of the medical regulatory agency in Country Y fell by 25 percent over the last fifteen years.
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period.
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
Which of the following, if true, would most help to explain why the 30 percent drop has occurred?
A. Funding for staffing of the medical regulatory agency in Country Y fell by 25 percent over the last fifteen years.
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period.
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
Tutor
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 967
Given Kudos: 87
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: As part of an economic development plan. Country Y has made a great
[#permalink]
13 Mar 2024, 11:29
13 Mar 2024, 11:29
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
As part of an economic development plan. Country Y has made a great effort over the last twenty years to increase the number of new drugs and medical devices produced by its companies—even though there have been budget cuts in some areas. However, despite the increases in government grants and tax incentives, the number of new drugs and devices approved by the government regulatory agency has actually dropped by 30 percent over ten years—even though the approval process has not changed nor the diligence with which it is carried out.
The passage presents a surprising situation in which, even though the government has "over the last twenty years" taken actions to increase the number of new drugs and medical devices produced by the country's companies and the approval process has not changed, the number of new drugs and devices approved by the government regulatory agency has "dropped by 30 percent over ten years."
Which of the following, if true, would most help to explain why the 30 percent drop has occurred?
This question is a Paradox or Best Explains question, and the correct answer will explain why there was a 30 percent decrease over ten years despite a twenty-year effort to achieve an increase.
A. Funding for staffing of the medical regulatory agency in Country Y fell by 25 percent over the last fifteen years.
Seeing this choice, we get the sense that answering this question is going to involve noticing specific details.
What we can notice about the specific details of this choice is that a 25 percent decrease in funding for staffing over fifteen years doesn't quite match up with a 30 percent decrease in approvals over ten years.
Yes, what this choice says would explain a decrease in approvals. In fact, it would explain well a 25 percent decrease over 15 years. After all, the fact that funding for staffing of the agency decreased would explain why approvals by the agency slowed down.
At the same time, this choice's specific information about a 25 percent decrease over fifteen years doesn't seen to explain a larger, 30 percent decrease over a shorter time period, ten years.
So, this choice is likely incorrect, but we can keep it until we find a better one.
Keep for now, but expect to be incorrect.
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
Presumably this fact has been true all along. So, it would not explain why a decrease started 10 years ago.
Eliminate.
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period.
This choice presents a comparison of spending on drugs with spending on medical devices but doesn't say that overall spending on the two categories of products decreased. In fact, for all we know given what this choice says, overall spending could have increased if spending on medical devices increased substantially.
So, this comparison does not explain the decrease in approvals.
Eliminate.
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
This choice is like choice (A) and once again is likely incorrect because of specifics,
After all, a 10 percent decrease in graduates from pharmacy schools over 15 years doesn't quite match up with a 30 percent decrease in approvals over 10 years.
What this choice says would perhaps explain a 10 percent decrease over 15 years but doesn't seen to explain a larger, 30 percent, decrease over a shorter time period, 10 years.
So, this choice is likely incorrect.
Keep for now, but expect to be incorrect.
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
This choice doesn't explain a decreae in approvals over the past 10 years at all.
Does depending on foreign patents cause a decrease in approvals? We have no reason to believe it does.
Also, something that occurred over the last twenty years would not likely have caused a decrease over only the past ten years.
Eliminate.
Having gone through all the choices, we're left with (A) and (D) as the only ones that could at all explain a decrease.
(A), with its 25 percent decrease in staffing over 15 years, is closer to a 30 percent decrease over 10 years than (D), with it's 10 percent decrease in graduates.
So, its a good thing we kept (A) since (A) is the best choice.
Correct answer: A
The passage presents a surprising situation in which, even though the government has "over the last twenty years" taken actions to increase the number of new drugs and medical devices produced by the country's companies and the approval process has not changed, the number of new drugs and devices approved by the government regulatory agency has "dropped by 30 percent over ten years."
Which of the following, if true, would most help to explain why the 30 percent drop has occurred?
This question is a Paradox or Best Explains question, and the correct answer will explain why there was a 30 percent decrease over ten years despite a twenty-year effort to achieve an increase.
A. Funding for staffing of the medical regulatory agency in Country Y fell by 25 percent over the last fifteen years.
Seeing this choice, we get the sense that answering this question is going to involve noticing specific details.
What we can notice about the specific details of this choice is that a 25 percent decrease in funding for staffing over fifteen years doesn't quite match up with a 30 percent decrease in approvals over ten years.
Yes, what this choice says would explain a decrease in approvals. In fact, it would explain well a 25 percent decrease over 15 years. After all, the fact that funding for staffing of the agency decreased would explain why approvals by the agency slowed down.
At the same time, this choice's specific information about a 25 percent decrease over fifteen years doesn't seen to explain a larger, 30 percent decrease over a shorter time period, ten years.
So, this choice is likely incorrect, but we can keep it until we find a better one.
Keep for now, but expect to be incorrect.
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
Presumably this fact has been true all along. So, it would not explain why a decrease started 10 years ago.
Eliminate.
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period.
This choice presents a comparison of spending on drugs with spending on medical devices but doesn't say that overall spending on the two categories of products decreased. In fact, for all we know given what this choice says, overall spending could have increased if spending on medical devices increased substantially.
So, this comparison does not explain the decrease in approvals.
Eliminate.
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
This choice is like choice (A) and once again is likely incorrect because of specifics,
After all, a 10 percent decrease in graduates from pharmacy schools over 15 years doesn't quite match up with a 30 percent decrease in approvals over 10 years.
What this choice says would perhaps explain a 10 percent decrease over 15 years but doesn't seen to explain a larger, 30 percent, decrease over a shorter time period, 10 years.
So, this choice is likely incorrect.
Keep for now, but expect to be incorrect.
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
This choice doesn't explain a decreae in approvals over the past 10 years at all.
Does depending on foreign patents cause a decrease in approvals? We have no reason to believe it does.
Also, something that occurred over the last twenty years would not likely have caused a decrease over only the past ten years.
Eliminate.
Having gone through all the choices, we're left with (A) and (D) as the only ones that could at all explain a decrease.
(A), with its 25 percent decrease in staffing over 15 years, is closer to a 30 percent decrease over 10 years than (D), with it's 10 percent decrease in graduates.
So, its a good thing we kept (A) since (A) is the best choice.
Correct answer: A
General Discussion
Re: As part of an economic development plan. Country Y has made a great
[#permalink]
19 Mar 2024, 07:02
19 Mar 2024, 07:02
Summary: Efforts put in to increase drug and med equipment sales - yet no improvement over last 10 years
Provided: level of scrutiny of the drug and med equipment remains the same
A. Reduction in staffing for regulatory board may lead to increase pending approvals ( correct )
Reduction in staffs can correlate to lower productivity ( though not completely air tight, approvals may be automated )
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
This looks nice but has multiple flaws
1. It's not just about drugs , maybe med equipements don't take 10 years to develop they only take 1 month (and more of them are developed)
2. It may take 1-10 years, but then that was the scenario all along, now with government approval it should atleast increase slightly but instead it has decreased
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period
Spending may fall but it doesn't strongly relate to decrease in number of drugs + medical equipment developed
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
Lower no. of graduates doesn't correlate to lower no. of workers, THOUGH lower no. of workers may correlate to lower productivity as in A
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
Dependency doesn't mean corelation with reduction in number of patent's ( imagine increased imports )
Provided: level of scrutiny of the drug and med equipment remains the same
A. Reduction in staffing for regulatory board may lead to increase pending approvals ( correct )
Reduction in staffs can correlate to lower productivity ( though not completely air tight, approvals may be automated )
B. New drugs typically require 1-10 years to be developed for market.
This looks nice but has multiple flaws
1. It's not just about drugs , maybe med equipements don't take 10 years to develop they only take 1 month (and more of them are developed)
2. It may take 1-10 years, but then that was the scenario all along, now with government approval it should atleast increase slightly but instead it has decreased
C. Research companies’ spending on drugs fell relative to spending on medical devices during this period
Spending may fall but it doesn't strongly relate to decrease in number of drugs + medical equipment developed
D. The number of graduates from pharmacy schools in Country Y decreased by 10 percent in the last fifteen years.
Lower no. of graduates doesn't correlate to lower no. of workers, THOUGH lower no. of workers may correlate to lower productivity as in A
E. Most new medical devices produced in Country Y during the last twenty years have depended crucially on foreign patents.
Dependency doesn't mean corelation with reduction in number of patent's ( imagine increased imports )
