Last visit was: 20 May 2024, 03:11 It is currently 20 May 2024, 03:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 361
Own Kudos [?]: 6524 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Kolkata,India
 Q44  V38
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 2873 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, HBS, Stanford
 Q50  V35
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Concentration: Accounting
Schools:NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
tejal777 wrote:
Really did'nt understand how they approached this question!!Please help :)


The Q boield down to is PR = QR? --> PR to be = QR --> Angle P = Angle Q. We know that Angle R is a Right angle. --> P+Q = 90. But d/n know their ratio.--> So, we need the co-ordinates of both the points P and Q to measure the length of PR /QR. No info is given about the Triangle PQR (i.e. is it a 30-60-90 triangle). But I understand that If we extend PR, QR is extended proportionately (right triangle theorem).

I would go with C, as neither of the statements is enough to have the slope of the traingle PQR.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 361
Own Kudos [?]: 6524 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Kolkata,India
 Q44  V38
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 361
Own Kudos [?]: 6524 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Kolkata,India
 Q44  V38
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
Could somebody show the workings?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 2873 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
hey,
which part of the solutions above did you have a difficulty in following?
i'll be glad to explain it in a little more detail if you let me know.
cheers!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 773 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
 Q50  V35
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Consider point \(R\) as \(R(e, f)\)

Statement 1) \(C=3\)
From this statement you can draw a conclusion that \(e=3\) as QR is parallel to Y-axis. But we do not know the value of \(f\). So Insufficient.

Statement 2) \(B=-1\)
From this statement you can draw a conclusion that \(f=-1\) as PR is parallel to X-axis. But we do not know the value of \(e\). So Insufficient.

Together, we know that \(e=3 & f=-1\). So \(R(e,f) = R(3, -1)\)

Now you can find out the distance between P & R, and R & Q:
Dist between P & R = \(\sqrt{(-2-3)^2+(-1-(-1))^2}=5\)
Dist between Q & R = \(\sqrt{(3-3)^2+(4-(-1))^2}=5\)

So Statement 1 and 2 together are sufficient.
Remember, you don't need to calculate the distances to answer the questions. You just need to know if the distances can be calculated using Statement 1 and 2.

Questions? Shoot...
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 2873 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
choice C is correct because when data from both statements is provided (that is the coordinates of both the points) it can be possible to determine the lengths of both the lines.

since it is given that QR is parallel to the y-axis and PR is parallel to x-axis, we can find the coordinates of point R.

the x coordinate for R will be the same as that of Q (which is point c)
and the y coordinate will be the same as that of P (which is point b)

therefore coordinates of R will be (c,b)

now in order to calculate the length of QR, we need the y coordinates of both Q and R.. that is points d and b.
(the x coordinates are not necessary since we know that the line is parallel to the y axis.)

similarly, to calculate the length of PR, we need the x coordinates of both P and R.. that is points a and c.
(the y coordinates are not necessary because we know that the line is parallel to x axis.)

thus if we know the numerical value of the points represented by a,b,c and d, we can find the lengths of both the lines (QR and PR).

now, if we know the lengths of both the lines, we can easily find the ratio and see whether or not it will be equal to 1.

if there is any particular statement in my explanation where you loose the flow or cannot understand, just let me know!

hope this helps!

cheers!



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93351 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts
GMAT Tutor
1905 posts