Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Are you curious about the dynamic field of Product Management and how it can shape your career trajectory? Join Carnegie Mellon for an insightful conversation about the MS in Product Management (MSPM) ...
Let’s dive deep into advanced CR to ace GMAT Focus! Join this webinar to unlock the secrets to conquering Boldface and Paradox questions with expert insights and strategies. Elevate your skills and boost your GMAT Verbal Score now!
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
Think a 100% GMAT Focus Verbal score is out of your reach? TTP will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Do you want to ace the GMAT Focus? Join Piyush Beriwala in this webinar as he guides you through a smart study plan to achieve the 99th %ile on the GMAT Focus. Learn the best strategies and tips to master the test and boost your score.
In this podcast, we talk to Lindsay Loyd, Executive Director, of MBA Admissions at NYU Stern, Hunter Brickey, NYU Stern alumnus and Daisy Cheng, a current student at NYU Stern, and more.
The Target Test Prep team is excited to announce multiple live online classes for GMAT Focus test-takers in May. Our 40-hour LiveTeach program will take your GMAT Focus score to the next level.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this
[#permalink]
31 Oct 2009, 15:09
I'd go with C.
to find the length of QR, we have to know both the y coordinates of Q and R. similarly, to find length of PR, we have to know both the x coordinates of P and R.
Thus, each statement by itself is insufficient to determine the lengths and hence the ratio.
alternately, the ratio of the lengths can be given by tan(x). where 'x' denotes the slope of the line PQ. In order to find the slope, it is necessary to know both the x and y coordinates of 2 points on the line.
Thus again we can see that each statement by itself would be insufficient but together they would be sufficient.
In this case, length of QR = 4 - (-1) = 5 length of PR = 3 - (-2) = 5
Schools:NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Send PM
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this
[#permalink]
31 Oct 2009, 16:26
tejal777 wrote:
Really did'nt understand how they approached this question!!Please help
The Q boield down to is PR = QR? --> PR to be = QR --> Angle P = Angle Q. We know that Angle R is a Right angle. --> P+Q = 90. But d/n know their ratio.--> So, we need the co-ordinates of both the points P and Q to measure the length of PR /QR. No info is given about the Triangle PQR (i.e. is it a 30-60-90 triangle). But I understand that If we extend PR, QR is extended proportionately (right triangle theorem).
I would go with C, as neither of the statements is enough to have the slope of the traingle PQR.
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this
[#permalink]
02 Nov 2009, 06:15
hey, which part of the solutions above did you have a difficulty in following? i'll be glad to explain it in a little more detail if you let me know. cheers!
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this
[#permalink]
02 Nov 2009, 06:31
1
Kudos
Consider point \(R\) as \(R(e, f)\)
Statement 1) \(C=3\) From this statement you can draw a conclusion that \(e=3\) as QR is parallel to Y-axis. But we do not know the value of \(f\). So Insufficient.
Statement 2) \(B=-1\) From this statement you can draw a conclusion that \(f=-1\) as PR is parallel to X-axis. But we do not know the value of \(e\). So Insufficient.
Together, we know that \(e=3 & f=-1\). So \(R(e,f) = R(3, -1)\)
Now you can find out the distance between P & R, and R & Q: Dist between P & R = \(\sqrt{(-2-3)^2+(-1-(-1))^2}=5\) Dist between Q & R = \(\sqrt{(3-3)^2+(4-(-1))^2}=5\)
So Statement 1 and 2 together are sufficient. Remember, you don't need to calculate the distances to answer the questions. You just need to know if the distances can be calculated using Statement 1 and 2.
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this
[#permalink]
02 Nov 2009, 06:39
choice C is correct because when data from both statements is provided (that is the coordinates of both the points) it can be possible to determine the lengths of both the lines.
since it is given that QR is parallel to the y-axis and PR is parallel to x-axis, we can find the coordinates of point R.
the x coordinate for R will be the same as that of Q (which is point c) and the y coordinate will be the same as that of P (which is point b)
therefore coordinates of R will be (c,b)
now in order to calculate the length of QR, we need the y coordinates of both Q and R.. that is points d and b. (the x coordinates are not necessary since we know that the line is parallel to the y axis.)
similarly, to calculate the length of PR, we need the x coordinates of both P and R.. that is points a and c. (the y coordinates are not necessary because we know that the line is parallel to x axis.)
thus if we know the numerical value of the points represented by a,b,c and d, we can find the lengths of both the lines (QR and PR).
now, if we know the lengths of both the lines, we can easily find the ratio and see whether or not it will be equal to 1.
if there is any particular statement in my explanation where you loose the flow or cannot understand, just let me know!
hope this helps!
cheers!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Really did'nt understand how they approached this [#permalink]