hardnstrong wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
hardnstrong wrote:
It is really a GMAT question
I dont think we need additional information from any of the two statements to solve it
Question says "
a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?"
This means gambler added 2 chips (out of 12) in every pile to make it a pile of 14 from a pile of 12. That means number of piles were 12/2 = 6, because there is no left over. There cannot be any other scenario then 6 piles.
so whatever information we have in both statement is basically useless (new option "F" if GMAT want to add
or say both are sufficient)
any comments ?
# of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) --> \(x=6\) --> \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question.
# of piles before the winning \(x\), after the winning \(y\), so \(12x+12=14y\). Two possible scenarios (out of many):
If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) --> \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\);
If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) --> \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\).We cannot take x=13 (please see the highlighted part above) because if we take x=13 then its not possible to make piles of 14 chips each (Note -
each pile of 14 chips). In that case gambler need 26 more chips to make it a pile of 14 chips from 12 chips. But he won only 12 chips more.
OK. Let me clear this once more:
If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(13\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(13(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=156\).
AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(156+12=168\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(168\) chips in \(12\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(12(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=168\).
Another scenario possible:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(20\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(20(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=240\).
AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(240+12=252\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(252\) chips in \(18\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(18(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=252\).
OR:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(27\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(27(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=324\).
AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(324+12=336\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(336\) chips in \(24\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(24(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=336\).
...
OR:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(699\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(699(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=8388\).
AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(8388+12=8400\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(8400\) chips in \(600\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(600(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=8400\).
...
Basically if the number of piles BEFORE winning was
1 less than multiple of 7 (see the solution in my first post), gambler would be able to redistribute chips AFTER winning in 14 chips.